Why Comey Charged Under Espionage Act; Rubio Grants Visa After Bolsonaro Fled Brazil To US

Hello all you freedom-loving people. James Comey was charged again over an alleged leak of national defense information hours after a judge ruled his daughter was unlawfully fired. Flavio Bolsonaro is reportedly heading for the U.S. after missing a deadline to turn in his passport. And finally, perhaps the strangest of all, we have alien bodies and egg-shaped craft and silent black triangles are flying over secret military sites. Okay, let's get into it. Former FBI Director James Comey has been charged for a third time. The DOJ has alleged that he leaked a sensitive national security document to the New York Times in October of 2016. The allegation concerns a New York Times story that was related to a secret court order that required Yahoo to scan emails for messages that were potentially linked to a foreign terrorist organization. The story cited two government officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity about the order from a judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FISA Court, that Yahoo was barred from publicly disclosing. Federal prosecutors filed a two-count criminal information document in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The document alleges that Comey communicated national defense information and he conspired with others to unlawfully disclose it. Prosecutors allege that Comey directed FBI employees to contact the reporter in order to correct information in an earlier Reuters report and that the effort resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of national defense information that have appeared in the New York Times, but Comey denied any wrongdoing in an Instagram post yesterday. He called the latest action an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice. Comey said, nothing's changed with me. I'm still innocent. I'm not afraid of these people and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. The allegations were made public in court records on October 26th and Comey's lawyers immediately moved to dismiss the criminal indictment that was filed by the Justice Department. They argued that the filing was legally invalid and it came after the legal time limit had passed. Charges brought under the Espionage Act generally must be filed within 10 years of the date that the alleged conduct occurred. But the prosecutors filed the charges under seal on October 5th, which is exactly 10 years after the New York Times story was published. Even so, Comey's lawyers moved to dismiss the case and to unseal the proceedings. The Justice Department said that it had filed a criminal information to extend the statute of limitations for charges in the case. Also, a department spokesperson said filing a criminal information to toll the statute of limitations is a widely recognized practice in federal court and has been approved by multiple circuit courts of appeals. This is an ongoing criminal investigation and we will not comment further. District Judge Trevor McFadden held an emergency closed door hearing on October 9th. He granted the request to unseal the case but he has not ruled on Comey's motion to dismiss. The allegation was previously investigated by prosecutor John Durham according to a recent court filing of Comey's attorneys Durham wrote a classified memo in December of 2018 recommending no criminal charges against anyone in connection with the disclosure in January of 2019 the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia opened a second investigation of the same manner under the code name Tropical Vortex but that investigation was closed without any charges filed in February of 2020. And two other criminal cases involving Comey are currently pending in federal court. In September of 2025, Comey was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of lying to Congress and obstructing congressional proceedings. Comey pled not guilty, and two months later, a district judge in Virginia dismissed the case, ruling that the prosecutor who brought it had not been lawfully appointed. The government filed an appeal though and the court of appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard arguments from both sides last month but has not issued a ruling yet Comey is also facing a separate criminal case in North Carolina where he was indicted in April of this year on charges that he allegedly threatened President Trump the incident stems from a photo that he posted on Instagram showing seashells arranged to spell out 8647. 86 means to eliminate or to get rid of someone. In certain contexts, the term is used as a euphemism for murder. And the number 47 is interpreted as being a reference to President Trump, since he is the 47th president of the United States. But Comey denied any wrongdoing, saying that he did not know what the numbers meant. and he also asked a North Carolina court to dismiss the lawsuit he argued that this case is a prime example of retaliatory and selective prosecution but the DOJ has denied that the charges against Comey are politically motivated and the new charges against Comey were unsealed just hours after a federal judge in New York ruled that the Trump administration had unlawfully fired Comey's daughter Maureen Comey. You may remember in July of 2025 Maureen Comey was abruptly fired by the DOJ. Maureen is a former federal prosecutor in her almost 10 years of service in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. She had worked on several high-profile cases including the prosecution of Sean Diddy Combs, former Senator Bob Menendez and Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey sued in September of 2025, two months after being fired, alleging that her firing without cause, without advance notice, and without an opportunity to contest it was unlawful and unconstitutional. The suit says defendants did not identify any cause or provide Ms. Comey any due process for her removal. She simply received an email with an attachment stating that she was being terminated pursuant to Article 2 of the United States Constitution and the laws of the United States. According to the suit, then interim U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton came to see Comey shortly after she learned of her firing. When asked why she was being terminated, Clayton said, all I can say is it came from Washington. I can't tell you anything else. The Justice Department later said in a court filing that she was removed at the direction of then Attorney General Pam Bondi. Judge Jesse M. Furman of the District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled yesterday that Maureen Comey was unlawfully terminated. Furman found that the firing of Ms. Comey violated the Constitution's separation of powers and her Fifth Amendment due process and statutory rights. Justice officials said, though, that the termination which was authorized by the Attorney General at the time was legal under the Civil Service Reform Act. That act says in part that assistant U.S. attorneys are subject to removal by the Attorney General. The government also told the court that laws that limit the firing of such prosecutors unconstitutionally intrude on the president's power vested by Article 2. Furman rejected that position, though. He said that the law authorizes the attorney general to remove assistant U.S. attorneys, but Congress also allows removals only for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service. He further wrote that the government's assertion that it can fire career prosecutors at will would unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation's constitutional system. The judge granted Comey back pay, effective from the date of her termination through December 20, 2025, when she began a new job. A spokesperson for the Justice Department said that it disagrees with this decision and will appeal in due course. Comey's lawyers commented saying this hard-earned victory belongs to Ms. Comey, to all civil servants, and to all fighting for the rule of law. Today, Brazilian Senator Flavio Bolsonaro reportedly left Brazil for the United States. According to the Brazilian news website Metrópoles, allies say that he was expected to land in Florida this afternoon and he was planning to request political asylum. The outlet also reported that the Trump administration has been informed. Allies told the newspaper Flóra de Espírito that the escape plan was organized and enabled by a lawyer who was close to the Bolsonaro family. And CNN Brazil reported that he fled in the early hours of this morning with his wife and two daughters. Those reports followed a day of conflicting claims about where he was. The Argentine outlet InfoBay reported that he went to Argentina last night where he was expected to board a private jet to the U.S. but the plane did not take off. However, his campaign manager and close ally Senator Rogério Moreno refuted that report and Argentine authorities also denied that Bolsonaro entered the country. Bolsonaro has not been seen since yesterday and he also missed an 11 a.m deadline to surrender his passport to the federal police the supreme court justice reportedly canceled that passport just minutes after Lula was declared the winner that ruling is tied to a case where police are investigating Bolsonaro's alleged involvement in a money laundering scheme involving betting companies but Bolsonaro has held Italian citizenship since 2023, and he reportedly has an Italian passport. Recently, his brother, former Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, who is in self-imposed exile in the U.S., said that Flavio should leave Brazil if he lost. His father, former President Jair Bolsonaro, remains under house arrest in Brazil. In response to the reports of Bolsonaro's leave, lawmakers from Lula's Workers Party asked the Supreme Court to order Bolsonaro's arrest and to place his name on Interpol's red notice list. Then today, President Trump approved allowing Flavio Bolsonaro to enter the U.S. State Department official says defeated Brazilian presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro and his family will be granted U.S. visas. Bolsonaro lost to incumbent Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in a hotly contested race last weekend that bucked a trend of conservative electoral results in Latin America. Bolsonaro had been under investigation for corruption, money laundering and tax evasion in Brazil. He was ordered to surrender his passport after the election. We're told he's left the country, but his current whereabouts are unclear. Meanwhile, Lula's reelection sent Brazil's market to their sharpest losses in years yesterday, reversing recent bets that the right would rise to power. Brazil's currency, the real, tumbled more than 11% against the dollar in early trading, while the benchmark Bovespa index closed down 13.9%, which was its largest daily drop since March of 2020. Then, trading was halted for 30 minutes after the index fell 10%, percent triggering the market circuit breakers and even though the sell-off was paused today the markets have won back only a small part of these losses with real trading at around 5.31 per dollar also the Bovespa opened higher but it couldn't hold on and by early afternoon it was even down slightly from yesterday's close but Lula's government downplayed the turmoil as a temporary repositioning by investors, and they pledged to maintain fiscal responsibility. Investors are now watching whether his administration can deliver a credible fiscal adjustment while preserving social spending and investment. They are also watching to see who he picks for key economic posts, including finance minister. Last Tuesday, federal law enforcement raided several adult daycare centers in New York City, and this led to the discovery of another case of illegal check cashing and it revealed the relationship between adult daycare center operators and cash flow. Shu Fang Cheng of New York was arrested yesterday on charges of providing illegal check cashing services. According to court documents, Cheng was an owner of a New York convenience store that provided unlicensed check cashing services to at least three individuals, including an adult daycare center owner and an undercover law enforcement agent. Cheng directed that checks be deposited in business bank accounts that were held by various companies and controlled by others, and she provided cash to her customers for a 2 to 3 percent fee. From March of 2025 through July 2026 Cheng allegedly participated in providing over 1.1 million dollars in cash to her customers in an interview with Epoch Times and an adult daycare center operator who wished to remain anonymous analyzed the logic behind underground financial services and the role that cash plays in the adult daycare centers operations the operator cited a hypothetical scenario to encourage seniors to check in at the adult daycare centers and to enable the center to bill the government for more per-person subsidies, some unscrupulous operators distribute cash to the elderly. For example, the government gives the adult daycare center $1,000 per month for each senior that attends, and then the adult daycare center provides $500 in cash to each elderly person. If cash were distributed to 100 elderly people each month, it would require approximately $50,000 per month in cash. Adult daycare centers report on the care that they provide to the elderly, and the government then transfers funds to them. Although these centers have money in their accounts, they cannot withdraw large sums of cash directly to distribute it to the elderly. therefore they need a way to quickly convert checks into cash this is when underground check cashing channels such as the convenience store owner now come in handy first the adult daycare center writes a check in its own name and gives it to the store owner in the second step the convenience store owner does not deposit the check directly into the store's account instead he or she deposits it into a bank account of a trading company or wholesaler with whom he or she has a close relationship. Then they withdraw the cash, deduct a two to three percent processing fee and return the cash to the adult daycare center. The third step is the adult daycare center takes the cash to distribute to the elderly while balancing the books with fictitious purchases such as stationary chairs and recreational supplies. Through this elaborate scheme, public funds originally intended for senior welfare were transformed into cash kickbacks that could be distributed privately. Under the guise of cashing underground checks and fake purchases, these funds were used to attract more seniors to act as frontmen and to claim additional government benefits. In April, the DOJ established a dedicated fraud division to fully investigate and prosecute fraud schemes that are targeting the American public. New York is facing intense pressure from the federal government to crack down on alleged Medicaid fraud involving adult daycare centers. Currently, there are approximately 400 licensed adult daycare centers in New York State that are providing social activities, personal care, and nutritional services to about 45,000 seniors statewide. The state government's annual budget for this program amounts to approximately $500 million. In the face of increasingly stringent scrutiny, federal officials are closely monitoring whether certain organizations are allegedly reporting false services that were never actually provided. Miminaw, as the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, recently requested that New York State submit a corrective action plan within 30 days, clearly outlining how it will strengthen oversight of services provided and strictly hold them accountable for improper billing. Government officials in the US and the UK have recently released new details on unidentified objects. Let's start with the latest batch of declassified UFO files from the Trump administration. This is the seventh batch that has been released so far. It's also the smallest batch with only 28 files added and this brings the government's UAP archive to 478 files. Among those files are reports of mysterious black triangles that were spotted over secret U.S. military sites. Those objects were seen on at least three separate occasions over the past year, and they were reportedly reaching speeds of up to 1,800 miles per hour without leaving any vapor trails behind. In an FBI report, observers noted that the objects covered about 1.5 miles in just three seconds which is how that 1800 mile per hour figure was reached. The triangles made no sound and they showed no exhaust and on thermal scans they gave off a consistent heat signature across the entire object. That matters because an airplane or drone would normally show a stronger heat signature around certain spots like the engine. So where have these objects shown up. They have appeared over top secret sites where the government tests new technology and the sightings have sparked national security concerns. This is because of the advanced technology that the objects appear to use and because of the location that they were sighted over. But officials have ruled out the possibility that the objects were American technology. According to the files, there is skepticism that they belong to a foreign power. This is because no known country has those advanced technical capabilities. One of the most detailed descriptions came from a memorandum that was prepared by the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AERO, at the Department of War. The memo documented AERO's debriefing of two federal special agents regarding sightings at a sensitive national security site in the western United States over two days in 2026. The memo also included a corroborating statement from a third official who was stationed at a separate observation post, and it was that third official who first picked up the object on long-range thermal equipment as the object crossed a ridgeline. He then radioed the other two agents. They described a matte black triangle with an estimated wingspan of 13 to 15 feet and with a thickness of only about one to two feet. The craft rose straight up for about 10 seconds and it climbed two to three hundred feet above the ridgeline without tilting or wobbling. Then it reportedly stopped instantly and it hovered in place for about 20 seconds and from that hover it shifted directly into high speed horizontal flight. The craft then banked and it dropped into a canyon in just two to three seconds, moving at speeds similar to a fighter jet. But the memo does note that no instrumented speed measurement was taken at the time. And when it comes to its appearance, the memo described a smooth, seamless surface with no visible engine openings, no air intakes, and no control surfaces or cockpit. And these agents were not inexperienced observers. both have extensive experience with unmanned aerial systems and they noted that even a conventional drone at that distance would have been clearly audible but the craft reportedly stayed completely silent the next morning a ground survey of the canyon found no wreckage no ground scarring and no vegetation damage Arrow said that the incident warrants further investigation because the object's reported shape and movement closely matches other incidents in the Western United States region but Arrow stressed that the file reached no conclusions about the object's nature or origin and that the witness descriptions reflect their own interpretations now if black triangles weren't strange enough the files also head to Utah near the famous Skinwalker Ranch The 512-acre Skinwalker Ranch was featured on a popular History Channel reality show. The ranch is famously said to be a hotspot for UFO sightings, animal mutilations, and unexplained paranormal phenomena. In Navajo culture, a Skinwalker is a harmful, malevolent witch that can disguise itself as an animal. Among the documents in the 60-page report that is titled Utah Ranch Investigation which details accounts of alleged skinwalkers in the area. A local Utah task force was first formed to look into residents reports of unusual creatures around a property near Fort Duchesne which is close to the Skinwalker Ranch. Because the region was already known for alleged paranormal activity, a Pentagon program brought in a private contractor. That contractor Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies carried out the government-funded investigation in March and April of 2010 in Utah's Uinta Basin. Investigators interviewed more than 25 eyewitnesses. They included multiple local police officers, the director of the local fish and wildlife office, 11 Native Americans, and 15 members of the Mormon church. All of them described first-hand encounters with a skinwalker. Witnesses described the creature as standing upright with black and gray fur. One reported creature was estimated to be about six feet tall and roughly 250 pounds with a head like a German shepherd's but with a more human-like nose. People on the property also described a black shadowy figure as well as dog-like creatures that were running on two legs, little people, prehistoric birds, and a maggot about eight feet long. But the most concrete evidence came from one resident who said that his dogs chased a skinwalker through a barbed wire fence. He said that the creature moved as fast as a shooting star and that it repeatedly ran into the fence and let out unnatural howls. Then nearby coyotes began howling back. So that fence left investigators with something that they could actually test. They recovered hair samples that were caught on the barbs and they sent them for DNA testing. But the hair matched the DNA of a domestic dog living on the property and other samples matched raccoon DNA. So in the end, the report provided no confirmation that skinwalkers exist. And the Pentagon said that they cannot make a definitive determination on what the witnesses actually saw. And the recent UFO files also included an eyewitness account of the suspected 1947 Roswell crash that described alien bodies and an egg-shaped craft. The account came from a 2002 affidavit that was believed to have been provided by Walt Haught, the former public information officer at Roswell Air Base. Haught said that in July of 1947, officials passed around wreckage from a nearby ranch, including paper-thin but extremely strong material that no one could identify. He also said that he was taken to a heavily guarded hangar, where he saw an egg-shaped metallic object with no windows, no wings, and no landing gear. According to Haught, he also saw a couple of bodies under a canvas tarp with larger than normal heads that were about the size of a 10-year-old child. He said that he was convinced that he had seen a craft and its crew that were from outer space. But at the time, the military explained the wreckage as a weather balloon. Roswell researcher Paul Simonis, who is a Roswell UFO tour operator and researcher, said that none of this is new and that people have been debating it for decades, according to Simonis. The affidavit was first published in 2007 after Hott's death, and it has since appeared in at least three books on the Roswell incident. Now, let's discuss the close call over England, where a British airway passenger jet came within yards of colliding with an unidentified object at 5,800 feet. Recently, a report from the UK Airprox board revealed that the incident happened on June 24th, shortly after the Boeing 777 took off from London's Heathrow Airport for New York. There were 256 passengers on board. The plane was climbing towards 6,000 feet when the pilot said that a shiny silver object passed in the opposite direction. The pilot said that the object was moving very fast and it came very close to the right wing passing within 50 feet above the plane. The pilot then contacted air traffic control and reported that a drone had just flown over the right wing but when the controller asked about its size the pilot said that it was about as big as four toasters. Then the plane continued to New York and the UK Airprox board launched an official investigation. Then the board said that based on the reported altitude and description, they were unable to determine what the object actually was. The board found that luck had played a major part in the outcome or that a definite risk of collision had existed. In response, a British Airways spokesperson said that the airline takes these matters extremely seriously. He added that their pilots report such incidents so authorities can investigate and take appropriate action. And this was not an isolated case. In June, a pilot flying an Airbus into Heathrow Airport reportedly ducked when his plane almost came in within yards of a dark, unidentified object. In February, a pilot with Britain's Royal Air Force, was reportedly shocked when an unidentified object flew past during fueling. And that's a wrap for this episode. Thank you so much for your support of Front Page. Please remember to leave a comment below the video or just an American flag emoji. This is really helping us to be seen all around the world. The more people who watch Front Page, the more freedom-loving people the world will have. And please hit the like button and hit the notification bell after subscribing. And please share this video with your friends and family because everybody deserves to know the truth.