This MIND BLOWING Experiment Changed Everything

They're not aliens, actually. What they are, they're robots, okay? Every entity I've ever seen in a UFO, except for one UFO, are all robots. Military remote viewer McMonagle believes the beings people report inside UFOs are mostly grown, programmed machines collecting data for three to five individuals. If he's right, every abduction account, every crew description, and every recovered body story describes the tools rather than the ones in charge. Hey UFOlogers, I'm Christina Gomez and this is your UFO News Update. McMonagle recorded this conversation with host Michael Phillips inside Robert Monroe's cabin at the Monroe Institute in Virginia. He estimates he has targeted hundreds of UFOs, always blind, with the target sealed in an envelope that no one in the room has opened. And just to clarify, blind as in like he doesn't have any background data on what he's looking at until he sees it. Now, across all of those sessions, he reports never once seeing a And that raises the very obvious question of who is sending these craft. And on the Third Eye Drops podcast, his answer was a very small number. So there may be. Three entities, Max, on this planet. Like real entities? Yeah, real alien entities that have been here. Sorry to interrupt you, but like three individual entities or three species? Yeah, three individual entities, maybe five. He describes them as biological robots that are grown inside the craft, programmed for one job and then broken back down into raw material when the job ends. They show no interest in humans at all, and his reason comes down to distance. In his view, carrying a living being from one star to another takes so much energy and such a large craft that sending machines is the only practical way to work here. Which isn't crazy thinking when we consider that we have placed probes on Mars, on the moon, voyagers around certain planets. We're not sending people just yet. We're putting the technology first. The data goes into this UFO or whatever you want to call it. And once a month, it targets and dumps all that information into another UFO. That UFO is way bigger. It has an actual entity in it. In his model, a medium-sized craft carries 12 to 15 identical crew members. They stop a car, pull the driver into the craft, take blood or genetic material while she lies frozen, and then return her miles from where she started. The data moves up to the larger ship and the real beings on board. Those few beings also keep changing the robot design, which he believes is deliberate to keep us humans. And that would account for why witness descriptions of beings vary so widely. The real beings may be producing hybrids slowly, over generations, so humans eventually change enough for open contact to work, at least according to McMoneagle. That one time, which has now become numerous times, it's the same entity. And as soon as I see that fact, I'm shut down. He compares it to a tow rope being cut. After the connection broke, the only thing he would pick up was an upside-down Y, the old peace sign with no circle around it. Months later, he recognized it as the corner of an empty box, the line where an inside view and an outside view meet. He took it as a message and where perception begins and also ends. His Mars work has kept going as well. For the last six years, McMonagle has been studying orbital images with a contract at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL. He now has about 100 photos of what he believes should not be on Mars. And one looks like a shipping container about 33 feet long, 15 feet tall, 12 and a half feet wide, sitting alone in white sand. Another is a four-sided spire whose shadow suggests it towers over a crater and he estimates at 700 to 800 feet. He took that same image to the lab and asked what it was. And the guy said, we don't know. And I said, come on, you must have He said, well, we do. We think it grew there. He also describes a giant spoon-shaped object jammed into rocks, separate mounds of pure white and pure black sand, and a line running about 100 miles before making a perfect right angle turn. None of these photos have been released, and Tsai's estimates from orbital images depend heavily on resolution and lighting. Until he publishes them, these are his readings on those images. So which claims do you find harder to accept? Three to five beings running a robot network on Earth or a spire on Mars that a lab contact thinks grew there? Let me know your thoughts in the comments. McMonagle believes we are being watched because of our weapons, and in his account, UFO activity began with the Trinity atomic test in 1945 and has increased with every step that makes nuclear war more possible. He sees the real danger as the day humans can jump to another star with a warhead on board, and he believes artificial intelligence is pushing us toward that point a lot faster. So when I did the targets, I said, I told Skip Atwater, I said, Fred, these are not alien targets. This is over-the-horizon radar sites, high-tech stuff nobody's supposed to know about, okay? And he just looked at me, and from that point on, it was alien. As far as skip out water was concerned. For like a disinformation purpose. Yeah, because everybody, everybody else was saying it was alien. Okay. But they weren't remote viewing. They were going on the suspicion of or the leap. His reading is that the rise in sightings is a reaction to what we are about to be able to do, not a sign that contact is coming. In his view, the beings watching us do not want us to wipe ourselves out, and they want to keep us on this planet until we stop turning every discovery into a weapon. I'm concerned because the ratio of... There's UFOs that are being reported now and UAPs and all kinds of USOs. I mean, they're all over the place. And the numbers are growing. That must mean we're getting really close to that point where we're going to be a threat again. A remote viewer who can find a hidden submarine can also find a plan that only three people in the world are supposed to know. And that makes a viewer a security risk to their own government. McMoneagle's model of UFO crews, robotic workers answering to a few real beings, gives researchers something specific to test against witness testimony. And the files now coming out of the Pentagon as well. What's fascinating to me is... The more of that you do, the more of a threat you become to your own nation. True, yeah. Think about it. But mainstream science still considers remote viewing unproven. If McMoneagle released his Mars photos, would that be enough for you? Or do you need NASA to confirm them? Let me know your thoughts in the comments. I'm Christina Gomez. That's it for today. I will see you again next time for another UFO News update. Be safe and remember, keep your eyes on the skies.