The Justice Department describes the 764 network as a "violent extremist" group that originated in Texas in 2021. Authorities say it preys on children and teenagers, coercing them to harm themselves and send explicit pictures. In an exclusive interview with The Epoch Times this week, FBI director Kash Patel said arrests linked to the network are up almost 500 percent this year.
NTD discussed the successes of President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown with John Lott, President of the Crime Prevention Research Center. -- 📺 Watch NTD News 24/7 on cable, broadcast, and streaming: https://www.ntd.com/watch
Stay on crime. The Justice Department
describes the 764 network as a violent
extremist group that originated in Texas
in 2021. Authorities say appraise on
children and teenagers, coercing them to
harm themselves and send explicit
pictures. Members of the group have also
been charged with animal torture. In an
exclusive interview with the PA Times
this week, FBI director Cash Patel said
arrests linked to the network are up
almost 500% this year. He is outlining
some of the dark crimes of the group
that is being accused of.
>> These criminals were convincing children
to mutilate themselves. And in some
cases, unfortunately, more than one,
these children ended up committing
suicide because they were threatened by
the perpetrator that we will go public
if you tell anyone. with now with us now
to discuss Patel's efforts to go after
what he calls the worst of the worst is
John L, president of the crimerevention
research center. So John, uh, always
great to see you. Thank you for joining
us here today. U, the 764 network hasn't
been around for long, but is carrying
out horrific crimes. What do we know
about them?
>> Well, there [clears throat] Yeah, thanks
for having me on again. They're an
international online child exploitation
uh network, violent crime extremist
network. I mean, these guys are pretty
horrible. They force their uh child sex
victims to literally carve in with a
knife uh the name of the people that are
holding them onto their skin. Uh it's uh
they use all sorts of different threats
to try to control people. uh and it's uh
the violence that they've engaged in uh
with this child exploitation is really
stomach turnurning.
So Patel says members of the 76 network
subscribe to a shared permitted ideology
but operate in a decentralized way
online. Is it difficult to take down a
group like this? What are the methods?
Well, I mean, they do have some
coordination [clears throat] uh that
makes it possible to go and uh take them
down if but if you don't have uh a
centralized organization there, uh
obviously that makes it more difficult
to go and do that. But, you know, you
just have to go and and make connections
and then go and see who they're
connected to and see who they're
connected to. Uh so, it's a
timeconsuming process. Obviously if it's
some centrally organized and completely
run group once you take out the central
area there then uh then the network
falls apart but uh so this makes it more
difficult.
>> So John uh how optimistic are you about
the Trump administration making a
difference in these networks or groups
for example Antifa as well? Are you
optimistic um that if the FBI and others
keep up this pressure for the entirety
of Trump's term that we'll see
significant changes in America?
I think one can just say in general uh
the FBI during the Trump administration
is doing its job much more effectively
than was done before. Uh so far this
year they've had like 30,000 arrests
which is like a 100% increase over what
the arrests by the FBI were in in 2024.
Uh 25,000 of those arrests are for
violent crimes. Um, you know, you go
through the different numbers there, uh,
whether it be child exploitation or
other types of, uh, crimes and, uh, the
FBI is doing a much much better job than
was done beforehand. They've moved
resources out of the DC area to places
where the crimes are occurring. Uh,
they're letting the FBI agents go and go
after serious violent crimes. I mean,
they've in terms of the
10 people on the 10 most wanted list,
uh, the FBI this year has arrested four
of them. Uh, that's in less than one
year, uh, compared to the four in the
top 10 that the FBI arrested during the
entire four years of the Biden
administration.
John, what would you say is the core
difference between this administration
and the previous administration? If you
could put your finger on a key point
here, what do you think is making this
administration more successful in
tackling crime?
>> Well, I mean, there are a couple things.
One is, as I mentioned, they've moved
FBI agents out of kind of the Washington
DC office to actually go and deal with
crimes around the country.
uh you know they've also [clears throat]
uh made it so rather than going after
kind of political activity I mean the
FBI uh spent huge massive resources
going after people for attending
schoolboard meetings or uh you know
talking about spying on uh Catholics who
were observing the Latin mass. Uh rather
than going after those types of
instances, they're going after violent
criminals. And so, uh, you know, in in
many different ways, they're moving
resources to where they need to go if
you want to go after violent criminals.
>> And John, since this is in the news, uh,
about immigration, can I just ask you,
is there a correlation between mass
migration and, uh, the level of crime?
Is there a correlation at all?
>> Yeah, I think there's a strong
correlation. Look, during the Biden
administration, we had record increases
in the number of illegal aliens coming
into the country. Uh if you include
so-called gotaways, uh people that we
see coming across the border, uh but
don't catch, there are a couple million
of those, plus ones that uh were either
caught or turned themselves in at the
border. We had like 12 million uh during
the Biden administration. that doesn't
include the unknown number of millions
that we didn't see coming across because
we had agents were pulled off of
monitoring the border. Uh we also during
that time had a record percentage
increase in violent crime. Uh according
to the National Crime Victimization
Survey from the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, there's a 59%
increase in violent crime during the
Biden administration. That's much higher
than any other 4-year period of time
that we've ever recorded. Um, and I
think this year we're going to see a
drop in violent crime. We're we've
obviously seen a drop in murders where
right now we're headed towards a record
low murder rate in the United States.
Um, so you've captured and caught and
deported a number of criminal illegal
aliens, but it's more than that because
criminal illegal aliens don't want to be
deported. And so they want to stay off
of police the police's radar. And the
way to stay off the police's radar is
not to go and commit crimes right now.
So, not only have we removed many
illegal aliens who are criminals, but
we've made it risky for even the ones
that we haven't caught to go and commit
crime. And I think both of those things
help reduce the amount of crime by
illegal aliens. And I think in a year
from now when the data for 2025
uh comes out, we're going to see not
only record low murder rates, but we're
going to see drops in violent crime
rates across the board.
>> What are your thoughts on whether, for
example, President Trump pausing
migration from all third world
countries? Um, do you think that's
surgical enough? Uh do you think that's
going to contribute to a drop in crime
just uh across the board pausing
migration from third world countries?
>> Well, look, I think we have two
different types of immigration. We have
legal and illegal immigration. I think
generally people that have come in for
legal immigration tend to be fairly
law-abiding. Uh the problem is is with
illegal immigrants uh who tend to be
committing crime at relatively high
rates. Look, you know, as he the
countries that he's stopping uh are
temporarily pausing uh legal
immigration, uh many of these countries
are unable to properly help us vet these
people coming into the country. And so I
my understanding is one of the big
reasons for the pause is to try to fix
that and make sure that for those who do
legally come into the country that we
can properly vet them. Uh I don't view
that as particularly bad thing. Plus,
given the huge number of uh illegal
immigrants that we've had come into the
country, there's probably some argument
to be made to make sure that we properly
kind of adjust and deal with those
individuals before we let in uh millions
more.
>> Well, all right, John. I think we can
leave the conversation there. It's
always great to speak with you. Thank
you very much for your time today.
>> Thank you very much.