Ever have one of those moments where you
realize that you might have got it all
wrong? In a recent video, I said
something that seemed obvious at the
time, but after putting some thought
towards it, I think I could be way off
base. And today, we're diving into a
little archery experiment. Does adding
heavier tip overlays or a heavier limb
tip actually slow down your bow? Or is
it possible it could make it faster? I
always thought it would slow it down,
add more mass, slow it down. But right
now, I'm in a thought process that is
kind of believing it could be the
opposite. A while ago, I did a test with
Cass on the Shatterproof Archery YouTube
channel about beaver string silencers
and what was the limit to them. We ended
up adding beaver string silencers to the
entire limb. We started with a section
and we added more and more and tested
the speed and the noise to see where the
diminishing returns were. And as
expected, by adding beaver to the entire
limb, it created a lot of drag and it
slowed down the bow a lot. And we found
that, okay, maybe 4 in is the optimal
spot where it barely slows the bow down,
but you get 90% of the benefit of the
noise dampening. But I wonder if the
same sort of thing is true with tip
overlay weight. The hypothesis is by
adding more weight here is going to make
the bow faster. How could that make
sense?
Okay, did you see that the angle at
which the limbs are coming forward is
like from here to up here? So it's
moving like away from where the knocking
point is. So if taking the idea from uh
like kinetic energy versus total arrow
speed will change the amount of
penetration on an arrow. So a heavier
arrow that's moving slower could go
further in to a target than a lighter
arrow with a faster speed. A train hits
something versus a feather hitting
something. In my mind, it makes sense
that if this is heavier and this is
heavier, they're both moving out
potentially at a slower speed, but it's
going to have a slingshot effect on the
bow string and the arrow specifically.
It's going to want to pull those limbs
forward further because it has more
weight on them. And as long as the bow
can handle the stress, in my mind, it
makes sense that it's going to snap that
arrow faster. Am I crazy? This has
always been my method here on YouTube is
if I have an idea why, just test it.
Like, there's nothing to lose. Well,
except breaking a bow and it's a good
time. Plus, that's how we learn is by uh
stretching the limits. So, I have some
lead weights and we'll uh weigh these
out and we'll start with a very small
amount. I'm not going to start with a
big piece. So, we'll shoot through the
chronograph and I'll do a bunch of tests
to get a really solid baseline. Okay, I
got feet per second and let's h zip
through these.
Ever have those days where you are just
uh swamped and you like don't have any
time? But the problem is you don't just
want to go pick up junk food and feel
terrible and lose a lot of your energy.
That's where today's sponsor comes into
play. Hule. Now, if you've never heard
of it, Hule is a nutritionally complete
meal in powder form. I've been drinking
the Black Edition chocolate. Also, it's
packed with what your body needs:
protein, healthy fats, carbs, and fiber,
and 27 essential vitamins and minerals.
It's perfect for when I'm slammed with
work. It's perfect for when I'm busy
because I can have a 400 calorie lunch
that makes me feel good and boosts me on
for the rest of the day. You can try
Hule with 15% off using my code Kramer
15 at hule.com/kramer15.
The cure code's right here. Link is in
the description. Just make sure you add
water to your cup first before the
powder. Trust me.
Okay, three more shots.
Okay, so that was 12 shots. We'll take
off the two fastest and the two slowest
and then take the middle eight shots and
average those. This will hopefully help
compensate for my inconsistency and
form. So, the question is, how much lead
do we start with? This is get dicey when
you're actually thinking about taping
lead to the tip of your bow. I say very
little. I was setting up so that I could
melt some of this down and then I could
uh pour it out into uh exact form so
that I would get the exact weights I
wanted. Then I realized no because
normally the the thing you need's right
in front of you. Example field points 75
grain up to 350
I believe. So we can take these and
apply them to the ends. They're thin.
They're already pre-eighed. If we need
to go over 350 grains we will with the
lead. get this piece and tape it on
tight enough that it doesn't fly off.
This is absolutely ridiculous. I've
talked in the past about stiffening the
limb tips without adding mass so that
it's not slowed down. But if you think
of seas, that is a lot of extra weight
and those are some of the fastest bows.
Could it maybe not be the design that's
making it just fast, but also the weight
distribution? It's actually probably
really safe to shoot this. I'm not
concerned about that at all. Just 75
grains. 75 grains may not be enough to
make a difference. Who knows? Maybe
it'll be just like 5 ft per second
slower. And we're like, ah, debunked
crayer crazy. We'll see. Uh, these
arrows are the exact same. And I'm
standing at the same distance trying to
make everything as consistent as
possible.
Uh-oh.
Okay, it looks like I'm uh potentially
debunked already. I'm not done there,
though. First, we need to add some more
weight and test it on a long bow, too,
because that could have something to do
with it. A little bit of weight made it
a few feet per second slower. What will
going from 75 grains to 200 grains do?
Let's find out.
200 grains on each tip. Let's see what
happens. Prediction.
slower.
Okay, this is good news. So, more tip
weight makes it slower. Long bow test.
Man, this long bow is bad. So, we'll
start with the uh 75 grain and tape
those on here. And real talk, guys,
there there's days like yesterday. I had
five videos I had to finish yesterday
for this series and I was here all day
and just did not have time. What did I
do? Well, I brought Hule with me and had
a Hule meal for lunch, which pushed me
over until I could go home for dinner.
The convenience is unbelievable. And the
other real big benefit is it's like
$2.65
per meal. Try getting that somewhere
else today. So, if you want to try it
out, again, use my code Kramer 15. It
gets you 15% off.
Kramer and uh QR code's right here.
Let's shoot this and see uh see if the
long bow gets the same results as the
recurve. 75 grains.
This is so cool because I don't care the
results. I want to know the truth. And
if I can get closest to the truth, then
I can make a better bow. So, I think we
can draw the conclusion that mass alone
is not going to make it faster. As a
matter of fact, it's going to make it
slower. And this video is an
intermission to a seven or eight part
series. And in one of those later
videos, I say that you don't have to add
a tip overlay, but you can. But if you
do, it might make it a little slower.
So, how much slower? Well, 75 grain is
tending to slow down the arrow 4 to 8 ft
per second. But how heavy are tip
overlays? Okay, I've gathered various
different tip overlays. Let's see how
heavy they are. It'll be like 2/3 this
weight cuz this will be shaped a little
bit. But that's a maple one. This one's
maple with fiberglass.
Okay, this scale is not registering.
Let's uh here.
There we go. We're at 194.
Okay, this one's the heaviest and it's
doing uh six g
grains. I mean, and six. So, these tip
overlays are so light. The heaviest one
is six grains and um it's going to be
less than that. It's going to be four.
And the other ones didn't register cuz
that scale, I guess, isn't going to
measure a grain or two. So, it's not
that tip overlays will make the bow a
lot slower, but you're going to expect
the tip overlay to make the arrow fly a
quarter of a feet per second about
slower, which is a small enough number.
It's irrelevant. Unless there's 20
places on the bow, you can make it a
quarter of a foot per second faster and
end up with 5 ft per second faster bow.
You might find this interesting. This
here is not a recurve, but it is the
most efficient bow I've made when it
comes to speed. And I did add a really
really small tip overlay, but it was
unnecessary. You see, I added this piece
of I don't remember what it was at the
time. It's either fiberglass, carbon
fiber, or phenolic. That piece stiffens
up the limb tip so it doesn't bend,
making the working limb shorter, giving
it a a lever, which seems to be more
effective than weight. I was curious if
bow design or weight made the bigger
effect. Well, it's clearly design, but
with that lever, you want to add as
little weight as possible. Now, we know
that for sure. So, if speed's the goal
on a bow like this, we'd want this
non-bending area to be as light as
possible. Same thing with a limb wedge
design like this. Now, just imagine I've
done 10 or 15 tests like this. And I try
to make them as accurate as possible so
that I can draw some sort of conclusion
that says if speed's the goal, let's try
to reduce the weight of the limbs.
There's always limitations and
trade-offs you have to make. But having
as accurate as information as you can
can help you decide which trade-offs to
make. This is what? Oh yeah, the bear
magnum wide limbs. And then take this
test bow which is 1 in wide limbs. So
basically I don't know 2 1 and 3/4 in to
1 in. The wider limb is going to create
more drag through the air. But what if
the wider limb allowed you to go lighter
on the material for the same draw
weight? Does that wider limb with the
same draw weight go faster than a
thinner limb with the same draw weight?
The thinner limb is going to need more
thickness. The wider limb is going to
need more width. The question is, does
width or thickness add more mass to
accomplish the same draw weight? The
quick answer to that is on fiberglass
bows it tends to be width adds more
strength to the bow with a lower
incremental increase in mass compared to
a thinner limb and making it deeper. But
I can't say that conclusively. I've shot
a ton of bows and made a ton of bows. I
haven't made two like identical bows
with only that one variable. If you've
scoured the internet for uh speed in
bows, there's a very very very many
theories that people have, but the
testing uh some people have done some
testing and then there's a whole another
group of people who speak their mind
without doing any of the testing. Now,
those people aren't necessarily wrong.
They probably have a 50/50% chance of
being right, but I would rather go into
all of these scenarios with a open mind,
test it, and see what I can figure out
myself. With that, thanks for watching.
Hope you learned something today. I know
I did. And I can take this nugget and
apply it to the future. Be happy today.
I'll see you soon.