Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the termination of USAID’s foreign aid programs, calling the NGO-driven system a “disaster” that wasted taxpayer funds and failed to advance U.S. interests, as the State Department takes over with a strategy prioritizing accountability and national security.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed the end of USAID’s foreign aid programs, declaring that the “foreign aid industrial complex”—long dominated by non-governmental organizations (NGOs)—has failed to serve U.S. interests and will be replaced by State Department oversight.
“[Foreign aid] should be used for the purpose of furthering the national interest,” Rubio told reporters. “That doesn’t mean we don’t care about human rights. That doesn’t mean we don’t care about starvation. That doesn’t mean we don’t care about hunger. That doesn’t mean we don’t care about humanitarian need. What it does mean, however, is that even foreign aid, which is NOT charity—it is an act of the U.S. taxpayer—must align with our priorities.”
WATCH:
USAID’s Decades of Waste and Failure
In a July State Department substack post, officials detailed USAID’s long-standing inefficiencies:
- $715 billion in inflation-adjusted spending over decades.
- Failed development objectives, with instability worsening in recipient nations.
- Anti-American sentiment growing despite billions in aid.
- Sub-Saharan African nations, which received $165 billion since 1991, voted with the U.S. just 29% of the time at the UN.
- $89 billion spent in the Middle East and North Africa left the U.S. less favored than China in nearly every country except Morocco.
- $9.3 billion in Gaza and the West Bank since 1991 fueled grievances, with NGO executives enjoying luxury lifestyles while beneficiaries saw little improvement.
“Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War,” the post stated. “The only ones living well were the executives of the countless NGOs, who often enjoyed five-star lifestyles funded by American taxpayers, while those they purported to help fell further behind.”
State Department Takes Control
As of July 1, the State Department assumed responsibility for foreign assistance programs, with Rubio vowing to prioritize U.S. national interests and eliminate wasteful spending.
“This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end,” the substack declared. “Under the Trump Administration, we will finally have a foreign funding mission in America that prioritizes our national interests.”
A New Direction for Foreign Aid
The State Department will now administer foreign assistance with “more accountability, strategy, and efficiency.” Rubio’s reforms aim to end funding for programs that undermine U.S. influence while demanding reciprocity from aid recipients.
“Foreign assistance programs that align with administration policies—and which advance American interests—will be administered by the State Department,” the post affirmed.
The move marks a major shift in U.S. foreign policy, prioritizing results over rhetoric and taxpayer value over NGO enrichment. Critics of the old system argue the change is long overdue, while supporters say it’s a necessary step to restore American leadership and ensure aid dollars work for the U.S., not against it.
Original article


Comments