All Arrested A Mayor, Police Officer, State Senator; NJ Voter Roll Subpoena; Crypto Scams Cost $1.6B

Hello all you freedom-loving people, a state senator accused of helping run a criminal enterprise, a mayor facing fraud charges, and a police officer accused of taking over a dead man's house, all arrested. New Jersey is under congressional subpoena, and the FBI says that crypto scams have cost Americans billions, while France keeps reminding its leaders that street protests can change policy. Okay, let's get into it. Two elected officials are facing criminal charges, and one state government is facing a congressional subpoena. The cases involve a state senator in Virginia, a mayor in Florida, and the voter rolls in New Jersey. Let's start with Virginia. Today, federal prosecutors have charged Democratic Virginia State Senator Eloise Lucas with allegedly helping lead a criminal enterprise that trafficked marijuana and laundered the proceeds. According to the indictment, which has 45 pages, Lucas and six others, including several relatives, are accused of racketeering conspiracy, marijuana distribution conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and honest services fraud conspiracy. While marijuana is legal to possess in Virginia, recreational retail sales are not yet underway, even though shops across the state sell other cannabis-derived products. During a press conference today, Attorney General Todd Blanche said that Lucas allegedly directed the scheme, she supervised the laundering of proceeds, and she used her political influence to demand and accept a bribe. This morning, seven individuals were arrested or surrendered for allegedly participating in a large-scale RICO drug trafficking and money laundering conspiracy. One of those individuals is the president pro tempore of the Virginia State Senate, Lily Louise Lucas of Portsmouth, Virginia. A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia returned an indictment against all seven individuals on October 14th of this year. The defendants are currently in federal custody, and my understanding is there's an initial appearance later this afternoon in federal court. The remaining six defendants listed in the indictment include Senator Lucas' daughters, Lisa Lucas-Burke and Teresa Lucas-Lamb, Ms. Lucas' grandson, Ryan Eichelberger, Prince Albert William Hudson III, Carlton Upton Jr., and Tameka Johnson. Senator Lucas has been charged and indicted with five counts. Racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana, Conspiracy to launder money Conspiracy to commit honest services fraud And maintaining a drug-involved premises The other counts listed in the indictment that she's not charged in Include possession of a firearm In furtherance of a drug trafficking crime And wire fraud All seven defendants are charged for their various roles They allegedly played in the Lucas Enterprise The indictment alleges that Senator Lucas Approved and directed criminal activities And other activities to benefit the affairs of the Lucas Enterprise, that she arranged for the acquisition and distribution of marijuana, that she supervised the laundering of marijuana proceeds, and that she used her political influence to demand and accept a bribe and attempted to influence Virginia legislation for the benefit of herself and her family. Lucas has served in the state Senate since 1992, and she is its president tempora. She currently leads the Finance Committee, through which all legislation with any budget impact must flow. But FBI Director Kash Patel said that Lucas used her role as chair of the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee to shield the enterprise from criminal scrutiny. As alleged by the Attorney General, Ms. Lucas, for the last nearly five years, accumulated nearly $5 million in ill-gotten gains through her criminal enterprise. Ms. Lucas served in a position of trust for nearly four decades and served as the President Pro Tempore of the Senate for the Virginia State Senate for these last five, six years. During that time, as alleged in the indictment, her and her six co-conspirators, instead of serving the public, as was her job, manufactured and created a criminal enterprise to illicitly enrich themselves by procuring sales and stores and divisions through the marijuana and CBD enterprise. Ms. Lucas has many things to answer for on the allegation. The purpose of her enterprise included trafficking large quantities of illegal marijuana, creating generational wealth for members and associates of her criminal enterprise, recycling drug proceeds to expand the operation that she launched and created, and steering marijuana licenses to entities in which members held financial interest. During her time as Virginia State Senator, instead of enforcing the law, she was actually breaking the law, as alleged in the indictment, and then using her position of power and public trust to deflect and defend against her own criminal enterprise. Truly the epitome of hypocrisy for a public official. Ms. Lucas, on January 24, 2022, posted on social media, I'm a 78-year-old grandma who legalized pot and now has her own cannabis store. And I'm the last thing standing between the GOP and total control of Virginia. That's worth and rt end quote while she was posting these things and the reason i highlighted it is because during this time period her and her co-conspirators continued her criminal conspiracy to enrich themselves and break the public trust after the charges lucas wrote on x that the case is political and she pointed to growing up under Jim Crow, Jim Crow refers to a collection of local and state laws that enforced racial segregation that ended in the mid-20th century. She said, I've seen what happens when people in power try to silence those who stand up to them. Brian Woolfolk, the chief counsel for her legal defense fund, called the case the circus that they always expected, and he said that they will wait for more details before responding. Now let's discuss the case in Florida where Kissimmee Mayor Jackie Espinoza was arrested yesterday. Espinoza was arrested on grand theft and organized fraud charges that are tied to COVID-19 relief money. State Attorney General James Uthmeyer accused Espinoza of illegally granting herself, her husband, and her family members $50,000 from a small business relief program that she created. Prosecutors say that she created, funded, and promoted the Kissimmee Business Boost 2.0 program, and then she submitted her applications before anyone else on opening day. Florida Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ngoglia says that a routine audit flagged the payments, which included $20,000 to a company that she fully owned and $15,000 to her husband's company. The city manager allegedly messaged Espinoza that the city attorney believed she could not receive the funds, but she allegedly replied that the opinion was confusing. Now, Espinoza faces up to 30 years in prison if convicted on all charges. A bond amount for her release has not yet been set, but her attorney, Migdalia Perez, says that Espinoza is innocent and that this was a publicly approved grant program that was run by city staff. It was not a secret scheme to steal taxpayer money. Perez also argues that there is a fundamental difference between an ethics violation and a crime, and the prosecutors must prove criminal intent. A state ethics probe in July found that Espinoza violated three ethics rules, But a city commission impeachment vote stalled after a deadlock last month. Espinoza was being held at the Osceola County Jail without bond ahead of her first court appearance this afternoon. For now, the city says that Vice Mayor Angela Eadie will handle mayoral duties at commission meetings and ceremonial events while Espinoza is absent. Now, let's discuss the case in New Jersey, where two House committees are subpoenaing the Department of State for New Jersey over thousands of non-citizens who were found on their voter rolls. Jim Jordan, the chair of the Judiciary Committee, and Brian Stile, the chair of the Administration Committee, say that the Department of State for New Jersey only provided 12 documents for unspecified privilege issues. The subpoena was also signed by Laurel Lee, the election subcommittee chairwoman of Florida, and by Jeff Van Drew, the oversight subcommittee chairman of New Jersey. The subpoena gives Shirley Emma Haley, who is the acting secretary of New Jersey, until November 16th to turn over records. This deadline falls after the November 3rd midterm elections. The committees first requested documents on August 3rd, and they say that the state's response has impeded their ability to conduct oversight and to consider legislative reforms. Between June of 2023 and 2024, about 6,600 non-citizens were automatically registered to vote in New Jersey, and roughly 400 of them were found to have voted. But they signed up at the Motor Vehicle Commission office before Governor Sherrill took office, and they had all marked themselves as non-citizens on their license or ID applications and 60 of them were imprisoned at the time and 750 of them had checked no when they were asked if they were old enough to vote. New Jersey Governor Mikey Sherrill blames a software error at the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission but the software company Edemia denies that claim. Sherrill says that the state has removed more than 5,100 people from the voter rolls and referred others to local election clerks for removal. But the committee say that the state still has not explained how the alleged error was discovered and why non-citizens stayed on the rolls until 2026. In response Cheryl accused Jordan and Van Drew of staging political theater less than two weeks before election day. Cheryl said that her administration acted right away after finding the problem they shared the facts made reforms across the agency and they have been transparent the whole time but van drew says that hundreds of the improperly registered people went on to vote and he accused the Sherrill administration of answering congress with political attacks instead of real explanations van drew also said that if this was simply a software glitch, then the Sherrill administration should show the evidence. According to Van Drew, the original failure began under former Governor Phil Murphy, but he says that the current administration is still responsible for answering investigators. Republicans are pointing to the New Jersey case as they push Congress to pass the Save America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote. The Department of Homeland Security is also cracking down on non-citizen voting in nine states, including California, Georgia, and New York. Recently, the Supreme Court allowed DHS to keep using its SAVE database, which lets states check their voter lists for non-citizens. But because federal law bars mass voter roll removals within 90 days of a federal election, States can only check individual names for now. They cannot run their full list until after November. When asked whether states are turning over voter information after that ruling, Blatt said today that some states are complying and the Trump administration would rather work with them than go to court. Our states, what are you going to do? What is the Justice Department going to do if they don't comply? Well, so some states are complying, but what we're going to do if they don't comply we want to work with the states we're not trying to it's not our desire to go to court every time something happens it doesn't happen so we're hopeful that states when they look at the supreme court's decision and the requests that dhs is making that the doj doesn't have to get involved that's not a doj issue that's dhs and the only time it becomes a doj issue is if if we have to represent dhs in court so we're hopeful that that that process works its way out with dhs and and we'll go but if it doesn't we'll go from there i mean i you know we do have we're not operating as the Supreme Court has said we're operating within laws that Congress passed that have existed for a long time and so the fact that states are choosing at times to not comply with the law and the Supreme Court had to remind them that they do need to comply with the law most states will and I hope I hope all states do. A Florida police officer is accused of stealing the identity of a dead man and taking over his home after finding the man's body during a welfare Lauderhill Police Officer Brian Louis Suros was arrested on Tuesday on five charges including identity theft, fraud and falsifying official documents. The story began on July 11, 2022 when police checked on 71-year-old Dennis Enos West after a neighbor had not seen him in more than a week. Suros was one of the officers who responded. They found West dead just inside the front door from what authorities believed were natural causes. According to the affidavit, Suros later contacted the medical examiner himself. He claimed that he was West's friend and that West had no living family. But investigators say that there is no indication that Suros and West knew each other. Suros allegedly offered to handle the funeral arrangements and investigators say that he had the body cremated then by August 1st Suros had taken possession of the house investigators say that Suros used his police access to pull West's driver's license and social security records he also allegedly paid the home's taxes and utilities and he forged West's signature on a city permit for repairs Suros claims that he spent two hundred and fourteen thousand dollars renovating the home. This raised its value to about half a million dollars. And neighbors say that Suros talked about renting it out on Airbnb. So how did investigators finally catch on? It turns out that the family that Suros allegedly said didn't exist was very real. West's heirs learned about the home through probate. The heirs then sold the house to Equinox Realty Holdings. And that's when Suros' alleged takeover started to unravel. Suros reportedly agreed to give Equinox the keys, but he wanted the company to reimburse him for the renovations that he had done on the house. But when Equinox refused to pay, Suros took them to court and he filed a civil lawsuit in February. And that lawsuit is what prompted Equinox to bring in the Lauderhill Police Department and this put the case in front of Suros' own police department. So Suros is now being held on a $25,000 bond and he has not yet entered a plea in the case. President Trump said yesterday at the White House that the government has made a very big dent in scams by foreign criminal networks that lure Americans into fraudulent investments. These criminal organizations have carried out cryptocurrency investment scams and other online fraud schemes on an industrial scale defrauding Americans of billions of dollars the move comes after the FBI received more than 1 million reports of internet scams last year FBI Director Kash Patel said that his agency had taken down 20 scam compounds throughout the world These scam compounds are located in Southeast Asia. They are the primary source of this type of crime. President Trump said at the event, federal law enforcement has been able to warn over 10,000 Americans targeted for victimization and we've prevented $1.6 billion in losses at least this year. According to reports, federal law enforcement agencies have seized the domain names of hundreds of fraud websites and they have frozen hundreds of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency assets. FBI data show that cryptocurrency investment scams alone cost Americans $7.2 billion in 2025, making it the largest category of cyber fraud. These scams usually begin with a friendly text message. Then the scammer builds trust with the victim by pretending to be in a romantic relationship with them or by offering false investment advice and this is followed by convincing them to invest money through fake crypto platforms. At first the platform displays fake profits but soon after the victim's funds quietly disappear. Once funds are transferred to criminal controlled addresses recovering them can be difficult. France is experiencing its worst unrest in years and the toll of this unrest is staggering. Approximately 3,000 businesses were affected with economic losses estimated at up to 1.1 billion euros or about 1.5 billion dollars. Violent clashes broke out in many parts of France. So what exactly caused the situation to spiral out of control? Earlier we mentioned immigration and France's debt crisis. In addition to these two topics today we'll talk about France's culture of protest. France has a long and turbulent history of protests. Taking to the streets to express dissatisfaction is an important part of its political culture. The earliest iconic protest in history can be traced back to the storming of the Bastille during the French Revolution in 1789. That happened more than 200 years ago, so we won't discuss it today. Let's talk about some of the major protests of the past half century. These include the 1995 protests over social security and pensions reform, the 2018 yellow vests movement, and the 2023 general strike over pension reform. These recent protests have all been related to France's welfare system. Therefore, we'll start by explaining what makes France's welfare system unique. In the eyes of the French, social benefits are not favors bestowed by the government on the people, but rather they are part of the social contract upon which France was founded. And this is supported by historical evidence. In 1994, World War II was drawing to a close, and France was about to be liberated from Nazi rule. At that time, France's National Council of the Resistance, the CNR, adopted a post-war reconstruction program called the Days of Happiness. At the heart of the platform is a political compromise. All parties have agreed to establish a comprehensive social security system. This system covers health care, retirement benefits, and family allowances, and it is available to everyone. The terms of the exchange were that the French Communist Party and the working class, who were armed at the time, would abandon the revolutionary struggle, accept the parliamentary system, and form a coalition government. Thus, in 1945, the French social security system was formally established. Like the French constitution and the tricolor flag, it is an integral part of what makes France what it is. So in Germany or other Nordic countries, cutting benefits is a policy adjustment. It is something that can be negotiated. But in France, cutting benefits is a breach of contract and it undermines the government's legitimacy. Established in 1945, this welfare system functioned successfully under the social conditions of the time. From 1945 to 1975, France experienced a period of rapid economic growth known as the Glorious 30 Years, and this contributed to the system's success. Driven by post-war reconstruction and the baby boom, France's GDP grew by 5% annually, and the unemployment rate remained below 2% for a long time. It wasn't until 1973 when the oil crisis struck that the French economy slowed down bringing the glory of the 30s to an end. Since 1975, France's national budget has been running a deficit. However, in France, welfare benefits only increase regardless of economic conditions. The most notable example of this is in 1981 when socialist Francois Mitterrand was elected president of France. Logically, after the oil crisis, welfare programs should have been scaled back. But he did the exact opposite and expanded them even further. And he lowered the legal retirement age from 65 to 60. Annual paid leave was extended from four weeks to five weeks. The minimum wage was also raised by 5%. In addition, he carried out a large-scale nationalization of banks and industrial conglomerates. This reversal of policy led to three consecutive devaluations of the French currency between 1981 and 1983. Capital then fled France in large quantities. To resolve the economic crisis, Mitterrand reversed course in 1983 and he tied France more closely to Europe, keeping the French currency in the European monetary system. But even with that shift toward austerity, none of the benefits that had already been introduced were revoked or reduced. As a result, France has had to rely on borrowing in order to sustain its welfare system. Fortunately for France, after it adopted the euro, it was able to borrow at very low interest rates. And for a time, due to the European Central Bank's policies investors were even willing to lend to France at negative interest rates. Consequently France never gave the debt issue a second thought and they simply continued to borrow. So has anyone ever considered borrowing a little less? Yes it's just that every time someone tries it sparks massive protests in France. In 1995 then French Prime Minister Alain Juppé introduced a plan to reform the social security and pension systems. His reforms targeted the special pension system in the public sector, which was one of the main reasons for the bottomless deficit facing France's social security fund. As a result, a major three-week-long strike broke out across France. Millions of people took to the streets. Rail and subway services came to a complete standstill. The crisis finally ended when the government withdrew the pension reform, which dealt a severe blow to Prime Minister Juppé's political career. The failure of this reform turned France's special pension programs into a minefield that no one dared touch for the next two decades. It wasn't until later, with Sarkozy in 2007 and Macron in 2023, that the issue was taken up again. conservatives have long been dissatisfied with Macron's left-wing policies but in fact he too once sought to transform France's economy and in late 2018 France saw the outbreak of the yellow vests movement initially protesters took to the streets to voice their dissatisfaction with rising fuel prices and the Macron administration's increase in fuel taxes however their demands quickly expanded to include issues such as boosting the purchasing power of grassroots and middle class individuals, as well as calls for French President Macron to step down. The fuel tax is a measure that Macron implemented in order to address climate change. But nowadays, it's acceptable to openly question the theory of climate change, especially after President Trump made his position clear. But in Europe in 2018, opposing climate change was considered the mindset of an uncivilized barbaric person. At the very least, there was not a single politician who dared to publicly challenge this theory. So Macron encouraged the public to purchase electric vehicles. And he announced plans to raise fuel taxes in 2019 in order to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. At the same time, the French government announced that it would invest 500 million euros, about 550 million dollars, to provide energy subsidies to low-income families, and it would increase subsidies for the purchase of clean energy vehicles. This apparently would compensate the public for losses resulting from rising fuel prices and the cost of living. However, during this process, international oil prices rose and the government's energy subsidies were insufficient to offset the impact of the rising oil prices. At the same time, the government raised taxes on gasoline and diesel. So on November 17, 2018, more than 300,000 French people took to the streets wearing yellow vests to protest. They erected barricades, they blocked roads, and they occupied as many as 10 gas stations. and the mass protests took place every weekend. Looting and violent clashes were a constant feature of each protest. Faced with mounting public outrage at home, Macron delivered a televised address on December 10th announcing a number of measures to allegedly benefit the public. This included a 100 euro increase in the monthly minimum wage for 2019 and the elimination of taxes on overtime pay. He also encouraged employers to provide their employees with year-end bonuses for 2018. In short, he sought to quell the discontent through welfare measures. But in 2023, the Macron administration raised the retirement age from 62 to 64. But the retirement age would not be raised to 64 all at once. Instead, starting in September of that year, it was raised by three months each year. This might be described as a fairly moderate reform to some. However, in France, this is not acceptable. So Macron was unable to secure a majority vote in Parliament, and he invoked Article 49.3 of the Constitution. This article states that the French government can pass a bill without a vote. The only option available to Parliament, according to this article, is to vote no confidence in the government. But if this motion succeeded, then the government would resign and the bill would be nullified. It's as if the ruling party was using the credibility of the entire government to endorse the bill. But in 2023, Macron was fortunate that the no confidence vote failed by just nine votes and the bill was passed. So how did the French people respond? From January to June of 2023, they staged months-long street protests. The streets of Paris were littered with trash. And in the fall of 2025, in order to secure the support of left-wing parties in Parliament for the budget bill, the Macron administration was forced to announce a suspension of the retirement age reform that had already been rammed through. So you see, street protests have always come out on top in France In 2023 France's debt already stood at 110 percent of GDP yet decision-making power in France still lies with the people on the streets that's why street protests have also become an effective means of forcing the government to make concessions and that's a wrap for this episode thank you so much for your support of Front Page please remember to leave a comment below the video or just an American flag emoji. This is really helping us to be seen all around the world. The more people who watch Front Page, the more freedom-loving people the world will have. And please hit the like button and hit the notification bell after subscribing. And please share this video with your friends and family because everybody deserves to know the truth.