Trump faces fresh questions over ties to 'humanitarian' Putin

FMM - F24 Video Clips
18 followers
Oct 21, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Next, you are a humanitarian sir.
This is how Steve Witkoff praised the wanted war criminal
Vladimir Putin, Russia's authoritarian president,
the man who started the war on Ukraine and who
has kept up a cruel bombardment of residential
and energy infrastructure for the past four and a
half years. So were Witkoff's words just lip service?
He succeeded in getting an American
prisoner freed by Putin so maybe there was some method
in what seems like madness but it's worth
Noting this is Witkoff's 8th documented visit to Putin,
he's been to Kyiv only once, a special
envoy.
The Putin-Witkoff meeting lasted 3 hours,
there was no comment afterwards where Putin
thanked Trump and Witkoff for their efforts to end the war,
remember this is the war Putin
himself started, he can stop it right now.
Well Putin this Wednesday said that he's ready
to resume trilateral peace talks, that would
be with Trump and Xi Jinping, US and China,
about Ukraine, but without Ukraine nor with
you are present in Gulliver Crag, our Ukraine correspondent in Kharkiv.
Gulliver, very good
interview. What have people in Kharkiv
been saying about the latest diplomatic developments?
Well, people are absolutely appalled, of course,
to hear Steve Witkoff again flattering Vladimir
Putin, calling him a humanitarian.
Just about an hour's drive or a bit less southwest of here,
funerals were held in the village where a mother
and her one-year-old child were killed child in
its pram those photos you've seen and another woman
who was killed in that village this is
the person that Steve Witkoff is calling
a humanitarian in terms of what people in Kharkiv
have been saying about the american pivot towards russia
if you want to call it that which i think
is probably appropriate. They're calling it a betrayal.
That's the word that most people I spoke
to used. There's not panic about it, though, it seems.
Most people seem to think that things are
going to be very, very difficult.
But some people say, well, if we manage to survive in 2022, this
city, which really bore the brunt of the beginning
of the Russian invasion in 2022, people were
expecting it to fall very very quickly it did not it resisted
and it came back to life in a way
having been largely deserted that people think
that they can survive anything in a way one person
said we've had so many moments
when we thought that this is a betrayal that now they've really
dumped us that now we're really in trouble
and yet we've managed to weather it so there's that
feeling that somehow they will get through
though people aren't exactly clear how that can happen
without US support. A couple of people I spoke
to mentioned the midterms, of course, hoping that
either maybe all of this, what's going on now,
is something of an act because Donald Trump thinks
that blaming Zelensky for things is going
to help him somehow in the midterms, and others simply
thinking that if the Republican Party loses
the midterms sufficiently badly, then American politics
will have to change. But people are, of course,
extremely worried and extremely angry. To return
just briefly to that humanitarian comment by Steve Witkoff.
Oleksandra Matviichuk, the Nobel
Peace Prize winning Ukrainian human rights advocate,
she pointed out that Steve Witkoff
and Jared Kushner as envoys are very much not doing
their humanitarian work, even on potential
local solutions to specific humanitarian crisis in Ukraine,
such as that in the occupied town
of Oleshky in Kherson region.
It's the Pope who's been on the phone to Vladimir Putin trying to get
him to agree to a ceasefire there, not the US envoys.
Indeed, it is continually obvious that
Witkoff and Kushner
are constantly peddling Putin's narrative throughout this. And it's
understandable that Ukrainian folk, where you are,
feel as basically afraid as they do. Afraid,
perhaps that's too strong because they seem
to be very resilient. And you're observing that day to
day. But I imagine that people are deep down afraid.
And you say there's no panic, but it's
that there isn't any panic? I don't know
if Ukrainians are sort of now geared to panic. If
it's possible for them to panic, they've
been through such a lot. But that doesn't mean that
they're not afraid. That doesn't mean that they're not very,
very worried about what's happening. But
the emotion that I most often feel coming from people
that I speak to is more anger than sadness
or panic. But I was messaging people that I know in Kiev this evening,
and they were saying that
There is also sadness. There is also fear.
But I think there's just this determination that one way or another,
things have got to change and Ukraine has got to get through this
because they don't see any other solution than to, for the moment,
keep on fighting and keep on trying
to convince European partners in particular
that it's crucial for Europe to carry on supporting Ukraine
and to step up if the Americans are stepping down
and to just do whatever they can to keep up the fight.
Valeriy Chaly, the former Ukrainian ambassador to the U.S.,
had an interesting comment about Marco Rubio,
the U.S. Secretary of State, who had said
that Ukraine wouldn't exist anymore if it wasn't for U.S. support.
He was very critical of the Secretary of State making those kinds
of remarks, saying that it's a tried and tested rhetorical trick
that is absolutely not acceptable at this point.
But even if we decide to analyse the words that he used at face value,
and what would that exactly mean?
Ukraine would not exist anymore.
So Ukraine would be occupied by Russia or Ukraine would
be governed by some kind of puppet pro-Russian government
that Putin would have wanted to put in.
And what would have happened next, Valerie Charlier rhetorically asked?
Probably Moldova would have been threatened
or maybe the Baltic states and then NATO as a whole institution.
and that Marco Rubio really should know better
to engage in that kind of grandstanding
than to engage in that kind of grandstanding
because the consequences of Ukraine ceasing to exist,
as Marco Rubio blithely suggested could have happened
if the Americans hadn't supported it,
would have been terrible even for the United States,
according to Ukraine's former ambassador,
who's a very respected diplomat on the international stage, I believe.
Oliver Craig, a Ukraine correspondent,
joining us live from Kiev.
Thank you, sir, as always, very much for joining us.
Do stay safe out there.
Thank you very much indeed.
Go over there in Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine.
