Worse Than Tibet-Nepal Mudslide: China’s Fake Rescue, From Premier To Rescue Team,Everyone Is Acting

China Observer
822粉絲
At the Gyirong Port in Tibet, the scene was reduced to a field of ruins, with mud and debris piled everywhere. Chinese government rescue teams were seen clearing away rubble and twisted steel bars with their bare hands, while repeatedly shouting in hoarse voices, “Is anyone there?”
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT2kPBcD6tXn8TP_aV7BmgA/join
#chinaobserver
All rights reserved.
⭐You can support us at: https://donorbox.org/china-observer-supporting-independent-news
⭐For business cooperation, please contact us: [email protected]
Is anyone there? Is anyone there?
At the Girong Port in Tibet, the scene was reduced to a field of ruins,
with mud and debris piled everywhere.
Chinese government rescue teams were seen clearing away rubble
and twisted steel bars with their bare hands,
while repeatedly shouting in hoarse voices,
Is anyone there?
On August 26, a devastating mudslide struck the area along the China-Nepal border,
The port building has been completely flattened,
but it was not until the third day after the disaster on August 29
that Chinese rescue teams entered the core area of Girong Port
to begin search and rescue operations.
In natural disasters like this,
the first 48 to 72 hours after the event
are known as the golden window for rescue efforts.
During this critical period,
rescuers have the highest chance of finding and saving survivors trapped under debris.
By August 29, that golden window has already closed.
A ex-user shared a video and wrote,
This is unbelievable.
Rescue workers arrive at Girong Port lined up,
walked a few steps, and shouted,
Is anyone there?
Can you really find survivors in the ruins after a mudslide like this?
No matter what happens, they never forget to go through the motions.
Is this just for CCTV footage?
One commenter wrote,
This is how rescue teams from the Chinese communist regime,
representing the world's second largest economy,
respond to disasters.
Do you understand now?
It's truly shameless.
Another user said,
Put simply, it is all just a performance because everyone knows they are all dead.
Chinese democracy activist Tang Baiqiao said,
After being buried under tens of feet of mud for two days,
could anyone still respond?
What is going through these people's heads?
There is no need to put on such an absurd display of low IQ.
Even a comedy writer couldn't come up with something this ridiculous.
The CCP is truly finished.
Another video shows Chinese rescue teams 1.8 kilometers away from Girong Port.
Their clothes were still clean,
and they were carrying buckets and sticks,
stopping to inspect even small rocks.
One commenter mocked,
Red flags in the background.
Love songs in the video.
The port building was completely swept away by the mudslide,
showing up on a shallow riverbank two kilometers away
won't save the people inside the building.
No one doubts the firefighters who are working.
The question is,
why is the search and rescue being filmed like this?
One person wrote,
This is shameful.
Only a small part of China was affected,
yet with the level of development your country has achieved,
you are making propaganda videos instead of seriously trying to save people.
Even Nepal, a small country,
has put in more effort than you.
Another one commented,
They are so used to putting on performances in normal times
that they brought the same act onto the international stage.
Can they learn from Nepal and release the actual casualty numbers?
Can they publish a list of missing people?
Why do domestic media keep reporting Nepal's death toll?
What about our own people?
Nepalese official data shows that the death toll in disaster area
in northern Nepal was risen further to 675,
while the number of missing people has reached 2426.
As of August 30th,
Chinese authorities reported that the death toll on the Chinese side
had risen to 16 with another 546 people missing.
Nepalese police publicly released a list of missing foreign nationals
and provided unconfirmed body photos and identification information
through their Facebook page.
Chinese authorities, however, have not released a single list of missing people,
only stating that the transfer of remains and identification work are being accelerated.
Another video showed Chinese rescue personnel
using basic ropes to cross rivers and navigate valleys.
They wore clean, bright uniforms without mud stains,
climbing up and down rocks and steep slopes.
Meanwhile, inflatable rescue boats that would normally be used in the water
were instead carried by hand.
The footage also showed rescue personnel marching through streets while shouting slogans.
In another scene, armed military personnel appeared during anti-riot training exercises.
People commenting online criticized the footage,
saying the entire video shows almost no sign of them actually reaching the core disaster area.
It looks like they were working several kilometers away from the reported disaster center
with movements that were slow and overly organized.
They worked so hard carrying the inflatable boats,
what exactly were they trying to do?
Not a single person was rescued, but they filmed the entire journey.
Helicopters and drones, not a single one was seen.
Do rescue operations need guns? Why stage these scenes?
Chinese rescue teams have drawn ridicule for planting flags wherever they go.
Independent commenter Xiao Yang shared a video.
When the first Chinese rescue team arrived at the core disaster area in Girong County, Tibet,
if you didn't know they were there for disaster relief,
you would think they were filming a moon landing.
Everything is staged.
Other countries plant flags during disaster relief to mark the dead.
China plant flags to make propaganda videos.
Before August 28th, Chinese military rescue efforts mainly focused on command operations,
aerial surveys, supplies, road access,
and searches around the outskirts without entering the hardest hit core area.
Chinese state media reported on the evening of August 28th that the first professional rescue
team had reached the core rescue area of Girong Port at 4.30pm that afternoon,
more than two days after the mudslide struck.
The team consisted of 21 firefighters and one search and rescue dog.
The rescue team did not use modern equipment such as helicopters.
Instead, they walked through muddy roads and climbed along destroyed
slope towards the border gate area.
Images from the scene show that the team carried almost no rescue equipment.
State media said the first team only conducted manual searches and search
and rescue dog operations in surface areas after arriving but did not disclose the results.
According to Chinese state media Xinhua, at around 6pm on August 28th,
all rescue personnel and reporters at the scene
were ordered to evacuate urgently due to the risk of the barrier lake collapsing.
Currently, the main rescue forces entering the hardest hit core area
are still firefighters and other emergency departments.
State media reported that the rescue plan involves
inflatable boats entering by water and rescuers crossing mountains on foot.
The operation involves 681 personnel and 113 vehicles from the Tibet Fire and Rescue Corp,
Chitwan Mobile Corp and Chitwan Fire and Rescue Corps.
By comparison, after the mudslide struck Girong Port on the China-Nepal border
on the morning of August 26th local time, extensive news reports and images
from the Nepalese side quickly showed casualty figures and rescue efforts.
The Associated Press reported that the Nepalese military was quickly deployed
to help rescue people in the worst hit areas.
Nepal said it would allow foreign rescue teams and experts to assist with the operation.
On the afternoon of August 27th,
Chinese authorities announced that Premier Li Cheng had arrived in Girong Town, Girong County,
Tibet to inspect the mudslide disaster area.
But on August 28th, Li Cheng was already back in Beijing attending a Politburo meeting.
Regarding Li Cheng's brief visit to the disaster area, China expert Chen
said that when Chinese premiers previously visit disaster zones,
state media would quickly release footage of inspections and condolences.
This time, only a written announcement was released initially with photos appearing the next day.
He said the CCP turns many things into a performance.
In fact, similar stage disaster scenes have repeatedly appeared in China.
Chinese state media filmed a disaster relief scene in Fushui County,
on August 26th.
A Chinese soldier wearing a camouflage hat and a dark short-sleeved shirt was shown
waist-deep in muddy yellow water, surrounded by tall reeds and weeds, holding a lunchbox.
He used chopsticks to pick up rice and food while quickly eating with his head lowered.
The caption reads,
This scene is heartbreaking.
To race against time and protect the dykes,
flood control militia members hurriedly eat in the water.
It emphasized that the danger had not yet passed and that
they had no time to find a clean, flat place, so they simply sat in the water to eat.
However, several other soldiers and staff members wearing similar camouflage uniforms
were seen standing neatly along a concrete embankment, placing their lunchboxes
on the wall with some eating and others chatting.
Water bottles and plastic bags were nearby, a much more relaxed scene.
The video ended with emotional captions such as,
and salute to those holding the line on the flood front.
Ex-blogger Jennifer Zhen shared a video on August 29th and wrote,
Amazing CCP propaganda.
The PLA soldiers can get their food at a dry place,
but have to jump into the water to eat so they can look more heroic for the CCTV audience.
The post sparked discussion.
Some people wrote,
They didn't even have soup, only dry meals.
Others criticized the propaganda as cheap as treating people like fools.
Regarding the Tibet mudslide,
China expert Chen Po-kong said that although Chinese state media claimed
that the military and other rescue forces had been deployed,
limited public footage makes it difficult to judge their actual actions and effectiveness.
He said CCP disaster relief often involves staged publicity.
Xinhua reported that during his visit to the disaster zone,
Chinese Premier Li Chao also instructed local officials
to maintain their so-called overall social stability.
Wang Zhenzhen, Tibet's Communist Party secretary who accompanied Li Chao on the visit,
is considered a hardline CCP official.
He was sanctioned by the European Parliament for his role in human rights abuses in Xinjiang
while serving as the region's political and legal affairs chief.
Videos show that the moment he noticed the camera,
he immediately stepped forward and pretended to lift a map in front of Li Chao.
But the golden rescue window has already passed,
and Girong Port has now become a scene of devastation.
Satellite comparison images released by Tibetan authorities show that
Girong Port was completely flattened by mud and debris.
A report by the Tibet Daily on August 29 showed branches along the riverbank
covered with various debris, especially mud-stained pieces of clothing.
One tree branch alone had more than 10 pieces hanging from it,
with different colors and textures suggesting they may have belonged to different victims.
As of the early hours of August 30,
Chinese public reports still contained very few accounts from disaster victims in Tibet
or families searching for missing relatives.
After the disaster, an alleged internal directive ordering media outlets to follow
a unified narrative circulated online.
The document said media could only repost official central media reports
and should place a mudslide occurring on the Nepal side in the opening sentence,
highlighting casualties in Nepal while downplaying the disaster in China.
The British newspaper The Guardian reported that although Chinese state media sent reporters to
the Tibet disaster area, their coverage focused mainly on rescue operations
rather than the impact on victims.
The newspaper cited one report from a shelter in Tibet
in which the journalist did not speak to any of the people sitting behind him.
Foreign journalists cannot freely enter Tibet,
and local residents may face punishment for contacting overseas media without permission.
As a result, it remains difficult for the outside world to independently
verify casualties on the Tibetan side.
Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at SOAS University of London,
said that Tibet-related issues are placed under the framework of national security.
Even if people at this scene see more bodies,
they cannot release that information before authorities adjust the official figures.
By contrast, international media have been able to enter disaster areas in Nepal,
interview survivors, families of missing people,
end rescue workers, and film rescue operations such as helicopter evacuations
and searches for missing victims.
Chen Po-kong said that although the CCP repeatedly claims
that people come first and life comes first,
the actual disaster situation and rescue results lack public verification.
Democratic countries show it through actions rather than slogans.
Authoritarian countries rely on slogans.
Even when Chinese state media reported on the Giron disaster scene,
coverage mainly focused on promoting official rescue efforts.
On Chinese social media platforms,
numerous disaster relief videos and photos released by authorities showed obvious signs of staging.
After the mudslide destroyed Giron port in Tibet on August 26,
families and friends of missing people used every possible way to search online for information.
According to the Epoch Times,
many relatives of victims and missing people traveled between Lhasa and Shigatse
and other locations for days while waiting for updates.
Many others were blocked from reaching the disaster site.
Chinese authorities also strictly censored disaster-related videos and discussions,
while once again cracking down on what they called disaster rumors.
On August 28, the Hunan Provincial Public Security Department's Cybersecurity
and Technical Investigation Unit announced penalties in two cases.
Authorities accused a small number of internet users of ignoring the overall rescue effort,
using the disaster as a way to gain attention,
and spreading false information in comment sections related to disaster reports.
US-based political commentator Xing Tianxing said that the CCP used
to send military forces to major disasters,
but now because Xi Jinping does not trust the military,
he said authorities have stopped deploying troops and instead allow
local firefighters and armed police to film a few scenes for appearances.
He added that authorities also restrict public discussion and suppress people
who raise concerns about disasters by accusing them of spreading rumors.
China expert Yang Bo said that the people punished this time
likely only shared information from overseas platforms into China's restricted internet
environment. Even if some details were inaccurate, he said it was understandable.
But he argued that the CCP has repeatedly covered up the truth
and blocked information during major accidents and natural disasters.
The people who ultimately suffer are Chinese citizens,
who lose access to information and are unable to learn lessons
that could help them avoid future disasters.
The multi-story customs building at Guilin Port
was swallowed by the mudslide on August 26, sending nearby people fleeing in panic.
Dramatic surveillance footage from the scene spread around the world,
but the video was not available inside China.
As global headlines focused on the deadly China-Nepal border disaster on August 27,
CCTV's evening news instead led with the publication of Xi Jinping's new book.
After state media reported on August 28 that Xi had
chaired a Politburo meeting and issued disaster relief instructions,
the disaster once again disappeared from prominent coverage,
with Xi-related news dominating the headlines.
BBC China correspondent Laura Bicker said that
Li Qian's rapid dispatch to the disaster area was actually aimed at maintaining stability,
which remains one of Xi Jinping's top priorities.
A notice allegedly issued by a local CCP office
circulated online instructing officials to make every effort to maintain social order
in the disaster area and ensure stability and public confidence.
It also stated that those who performed well
would receive rewards while those who performed poorly would be held accountable.
On August 29, the Shigatse Public Security Bureau issued a notice imposing traffic controls
on all vehicles heading towards Giron town, banning all vehicles from entering the Giron area.
In fact, on the day of the mudslide, August 26,
the Shigatse police had already announced a seven-day road closure for routes to Giron port.
On August 27, China's National Immigration Administration announced that starting at
midnight on August 28, it would suspend issuing travel permits for Tibet's
Shigatse electronic border management zone.
China expert Yang Bo said that the new notice from the Giron port police branch
of the Shigatse Public Security Bureau showed that Li Chang had arrived with
instructions from Xi Jinping to tighten social controls rather than improve disaster relief
efforts.
At present, Chinese authorities have emphasized natural causes and attempted to avoid
responsibility.
China's foreign ministry said that the disaster was caused by a high-altitude glacier collapse
in Nepal.
But many people pointed out that more than a year earlier in the early hours of July 8,
the same area experienced flooding caused by the collapse of an upstream glacial lake
in the Purikambu river basin.
The flood destroyed the China-Nepal friendship bridge and left 17 people missing on both
sides of the border.
This year's disaster was a repeat of the same type of event escalating from a smaller
disaster into a much larger one, while China's disaster warning system remained silent.
It is worth noting that a report released on July 11, 2025 by a national key laboratory
at Chengdu University of Technology warned that the upstream Purikambu river basin contains
55 glacial lakes with a combined area of about 3.4 square kilometers.
The report warned that another glacial lake outburst flood could occur and called for
stronger upstream flood warning systems.
However, Chinese authorities appear to ignore the warnings.
After the friendship bridge, also known as the Risuo Bridge, collapsed under floodwaters
on July 8, 2025, border operations were suspended for nearly six months.
A temporary steel bridge reopened traffic on January 1, 2026, but public information
has not shown any risk assessment behind the decision to restore the original crossing.
Girong Port sits at the intersection of three rivers, making it highly exposed to flooding
risk.
Above it are 55 unstable glacial lakes, and the area is located on a fault zone.
Yet it was chosen as the location of the main trade corridor between China and Nepal.
In 2024, Girong Port handled 4.2 billion yuan in import and export trade, accounting for
nearly 30% of total China-Nepal trade and ranking first among Tibet's border ports.
China expert Li Lingyi said a similar disaster at the same location one year ago already
left 17 people missing.
Even after professional institutions issued clear warnings, the CCP authorities still
failed to act.
The result is that Girong Port handles 4.2 billion yuan in trade every year.
The CCP only cares about the economy and does not value human lives.
Taiwan AI Labs founder Du Yujing recently reviewed area footage of Girong Port before
the disaster and wrote on Facebook that the port was like a large illegal structure built
on the river channel narrowing the flood path and competing with the river for space, making
a natural backlash inevitable.
At the disaster site's river valley, the major buildings on both the Chinese-Nepalese
side were built by Chinese companies.
