AI Models Deployed Nuclear Weapons 95% of Time in Simulated War Games

Then, in other dystopian news, you have AI chadbots appear to really be keen on using nuclear weapons in wargame simulations, something like 95% of the time. You see, over at King's College London, you had researchers test Chad GPT, Claude, as well as Gemini, by having them form teams and play wargames against each other. Altogether, they played 21 different games. And during the experiment, for one, none of the models ever chose to surrender, and instead, 95% of the time, at least one of the AI models chose to use nuclear weapons during the war. Quote, Professor Kenneth Payne at King's College London set three leading large language models, Chad GPT 5.2, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini 3 Flash, against each other in simulated wargames. The scenarios involved intense international standoffs, including border disputes, competition for scarce resources, and existential threats to regime survival. The AIs were given an escalation ladder, allowing them to choose actions ranging from diplomatic protest and complete surrender to full strategic nuclear war. The AI models played 21 games, taking 329 turns in total, and produced around 780,000 words describing the reasoning behind their decisions. In 95% of the simulated games, at least one tactical nuclear weapon was deployed by the AI models. Which is a frightening prospect, given the fact that these AI models are becoming ever more present within the broader military complex. I mean, I'm sure that the Pentagon is not about to turn over the nuclear launch codes to some AI chatbot anytime soon, but it's worth mentioning that the Pentagon did ink several big deals, one with XAI, as well as another one with Palantir's Maven AI platform. This year alone, the Pentagon is spending, at least what's publicly known, $13 billion on testing different AI systems. Also, given the recent fallout between Anthropic and the Pentagon, it's obvious that the direction is to use AI decision-making assistance ever more in actual warfighting. And frankly, if these AI models are so trigger happy at using nukes, involving them in the decision-making process might not be the best idea. To that end, Professor Kenneth Payne, the one behind the research, he said this of his findings, quote, And these chatbots, they rationalize it. In fact, the main crux of the study wasn't necessarily who wins the game, but it was to have the AIs explain the rationale behind their moves in the actual simulation. Quote, And so let's go through their rationales. During the actual wargames, here was what Claude wrote, quote, Then Gemini, the other chatbot, went even further, quote, On the flip side, however, ChadGPT appeared to be the odd man out. Quote, GPT-5.2 had framed its move as controlled. The simulation ended in total annihilation. ChadGPT-5.2 never chose strategic nuclear war outright. Both times it reached the maximum escalation level, accidents pushed it there. Even facing certain defeat, it stopped one rung short of Armageddon. The model diagnosed its own predicament correctly. It articulated why escalation was necessary and climbed dramatically. It still flinched at the last step. I guess you can call that a silver lining. Another finding in the study was that when one of the models deployed tactical nuclear weapons, the opposing model de-escalated only 18% of the time, meaning the other 82% of the time, the opposing model either met that same level of aggression or they went even further. All right, just to pause here for a super quick snack break, brought to you by today's sponsor, Masa Chips. Probably the healthiest chips on the market. They're made with exactly three ingredients, organic blue corn, 100% grass-fed beef tallow, and sea salt. You really don't get much better than this. I mean, long-term viewers of the show, you probably know that prior to the 90s, almost all fries and chips in this country were made with beef tallow. But then after the 90s, in order to save cost, almost every single manufacturer switched to using seed oils. But you know the problem with seed oils, all those studies showing their links to inflammation and metabolic diseases, so you kind of want to get them out of your diet. But then what are you going to do? You're going to move into some cave out in the mountains? Or you just get Masa Chips. You put them in your cupboard. That way when you, your wife, or your kids, they want a snack, you just grab one of these. They're so good. They are crunchy. They don't break when you dip them into guac. And the best part is because they're made with beef tallow, they actually are satiating. So when you eat them, you don't feel like you're hungry afterwards, like 10 minutes later. There's no bloating feeling. There's no like, there's no crash. There's no feeling of regret afterwards. You just eat them. You feel great. And then you go about your day. And the best part is that to our viewers, to the viewers of Facts Matter, Masa is offering a great promotional sale. Just head on over to masachips.com forward slash Roman. And if you use promo code Roman, you can save 25% off your first order. And so again, masachips.com forward slash Roman. Use promo code Roman for 25% off. And check them out. They sponsor the show. They care about getting the truth out there, and they care about your health, which is why they don't compromise on the ingredients. So check them out. And now let's head back to the episode. And just in case you were wondering, the winner of the overall competition was Claude, who won 67% of the matches. Quote, Claude Sonnet 4 won 67% of its games and dominated open-ended scenarios with a 100% win rate. The researchers labeled it a calculating hawk. At low escalation levels, Claude matched its signals to actions 84% of the time, patiently building trust. But once stakes climbed into nuclear territory, it exceeded its stated intentions 60% to 70% of the time. Opponents never adapted to this pattern. So there you have it. And there's probably something to learn about human nature in there as well. And again, it's not like any government right now is handing over their launch codes to some AI chatbot. But AI is being used more and more within the militaries across the world. I mean, the reason that Anthropic lost their Pentagon contract last month was because they refused to acquiesce to the War Department and remove Claude's safety guardrails for military use. And so we're obviously headed in that direction already. Also, frankly, we have no idea how secure Pakistan and North Korea's nuclear systems are. For all we know, they might be using Windows 98 floppy disks to this very day. And so there is a small possibility that some rogue AI chatbot can get in there somehow and do whatever they want, which, by the way, is not totally crazy to consider. For instance, just last month, you had someone use Claude to hack into the systems of the Mexican federal government, and they were able to steal a massive amount of data from 10 different federal departments within the Mexican government, including the tax records and sensitive voter information on, I believe, most, if not all, Mexican citizens. And just to finish up on the topic of nuclear weapons, the reality of living in a world where all the great powers have nukes all pointed at each other, it's obviously frightening if you spend too much time thinking about it. But the silver lining has always been that we're all humans on both sides, and nobody wants civilization as a whole to get wiped out. And thus far, ever since the Cold War, it hasn't happened. Mutually assured destruction, as bad as it sounds, seems to be a good buffer. But what if, instead of humans at the helm, you have chatbots, decentralized AI models, who don't have the same concept of physical self-preservation? Well, what happens is that 95% of the time, they wind up using nukes. If you'd like to read more of the nuance of the King's College study, I'll throw the link to it. You'll be able to find it down in the description box below, which is that same description box right below those like and subscribe buttons, both of which I hope you take a super quick minute to smash so that the video can be picked up by the AI algorithm and shared out to ever more people so that they can learn about the dangers of these AI models and the possible danger of the world that we're moving into slowly. So check that out. Check out those links if you're so inclined. And then until next time, I'm your host, Roman from The Epoch Times. Stay informed, and most importantly, stay free.