Dr. Matthew Wielicki: I Refuse to Stay Silent about Climate Change | Stories of Us

PragerU
792 followers
When Dr. Matthew Wielicki refused to stay silent about climate change and earth science, he became a professor-in-exile. Even though members of the scientific community routinely discuss the negative effects of irrational fear in private, they dare not speak out lest they lose their positions and research funds. Dr. Wielicki shares his story and encourages the next generation to reject the doomsday narrative and maintain hope for the future.
SUBSCRIBE 👉 https://www.prageru.com/join
#climatechange #environment
Climate change is tricky. There's a disconnect between what the science says and what the
narrative in the mainstream media is. My name is Matthew Wylecki and this is my story.
I am a former faculty member in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Alabama.
I have a doctorate in geology and earth science and I am the author of Irrational Fear Substack.
I was born in southern Poland in a town called Wrocław at a time when Poland was under the
sphere of the influence of the Soviet Union and a communist government and my parents made the
decision to immigrate to Chicago like all good Polish people do. That's the Ellis Island for
Polish people is Chicago and then eventually I grew up in Fresno, California where we received
political asylum and eventually citizenship. I grew up on a college campus, Cal State University,
Fresno. My father was a faculty member there at the School of Business. My mother was in
information technology and staff. I would ride my scooter around campus after school every day.
It was something that I fell in love with. It was a place where there was these warriors that battled
in the playing field of ideas and then they would go and have dinner together and they would
chat and be friendly and it was just this beautiful place of just intellectual discussion.
So I pretty much decided I was going to be an academic when I was 10 or 12. I was always
intrigued by science. My original degrees biochemistry and cellular biology. I was what
was called a geochronologist. Geo being rock, chronology being kind of the age of. I received
my PhD from the Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences at UCLA and then I was offered
a tenure-track position at the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Alabama.
Taking that faculty position in Alabama was my dream and so I was absolutely excited. I was a
little nervous moving our family from California to Alabama. That's a pretty big move but you know
we were excited. It was definitely something I wanted to do but I noticed that the campus that
I grew up on and the one that my father and I would talk about was different. College campuses
have always been meritocracies. We have GPAs, we give grades and there was a shift from performance
and ability to what I would say are immutable characteristics. Meaning what you look like or
maybe your background or your race and those are things that students don't have any control over
and so there was this disconnect from what I remembered where it was this this competition
of ideas and everybody was on an equal playing field and it was if your idea was better than
your competitor's idea then your ideas would win and now it seemed that the ideas didn't matter
as much as characteristics of the students to appease funding agencies or whatever it was.
One of the things they did was they got rid of the GRE. This is the graduate requirement exam
so in the name of equity they removed an entrance exam and so I was now left with trying to
understand someone's life story from an essay without having any standardized metric to compare
them to so I would bring this up in faculty meetings and it was clear that they were checking
a box. There were certain things that we couldn't discuss in academia. In earth sciences if you speak
about climate change that is one of these taboo subjects and climate change is tricky. There's a
disconnect between what the science says and what the narrative in the mainstream media is
and what certain what I would call activist scientists have been kind of pushing. The
narrative in the media is doing so much damage to mental health. Climate anxiety is probably the
number one anxiety issue for the college students that I talk to and the science does not support
that fear. I think that that fear is irrational. Climate is a very convenient way for governments
and institutions to get involved in nearly every aspect of a citizen's life and if you are basing
your life decisions like whether or not to have children, whether or not to raise a family, whether
or not to make sacrifices today such that maybe in a decade or not you're going to be in a better
position. If you think that the planet is going to end you don't make those sacrifices. I definitely
love the earth and humans have an influence on the climate and on their environment and we should
minimize that but the disconnect that our small policy changes today will have some dramatic
impact on future temperatures or weather in general is untrue but if you speak out against it
you're essentially a pariah in this community. I gave a two-day lecture in my introductory
geology class about kind of climate realism is what I called it. The students were
amazingly refreshed to hear that the planet wasn't going to end in 10 or 12 years but
faculty members were a little uncomfortable with it. If you push out scientists that disagree with
your narrative this isn't an open discussion, this isn't about finding the truth, this is about
silencing those that disagree with you such that you can continue to push the narrative that you're
pushing. I started to publish a little bit more on social media and the moment that those stories
gained any traction faculty members in the University of Alabama were making posts that I was
committing violence, that I was putting their jobs and their safety in jeopardy because I was asking
questions so I decided to leave during COVID. It just wasn't that dream job that I had been thinking
about my entire life. It wasn't this this beautiful place of the exchange of ideas that I wanted it to
I don't think I would have been able to stay if I chose to stay. I doubt that I would have been
awarded tenure if I chose to stay because I had been so vocal. The data is very clear there is no
metric that we can call the current state of the climate a crisis or an emergency or a breakdown.
They're trying to elicit fear when people are afraid they are most vulnerable to changing their
behaviors. Growing up in a household that was very aware of some of the mistakes of a communist type
of government centralized planning the removal of the free exchange of ideas that makes me more
vocal because I see that we're making the same mistakes that my parents always told me we should
never go down this road the lack of tolerance for ideas the what I call illiberalism the idea
that if you question certain aspects of the government or certain ideologies that no longer
were you a good citizen but if you haven't lived it you don't know that these are mistakes.
Science is supposed to be about the discovery of the truth and the most important aspect of that
is the ability to discuss. I want young people to be hopeful for their future. We should realize
that there's going to be challenges. Climate will change but that shouldn't be a reason to think
that your future isn't hopeful. Thank you for watching this video. To keep PragerU videos free
consider making a tax-deductible donation.
