Elecciones 2024: ”Una sensación generalizada de miedo” atenaza al Partido Demócrata (Informe)

It is reported that a generalized feeling of fear has settled in the highest levels of the Democratic Party. Many have stopped trusting that President Joe Biden can be re-elected in November. The renowned constitutionalist lawyer Alan Dershowitz accused the prosecution of telling two lies in the final bars of the trial of former President Donald Trump in New York. And in this framework, a complaint has been filed against the judge who oversees the trial of Trump for his possible misconduct. And a former hotel worker in New York reveals the business that actually involves accommodating illegal immigrants. He explains that hotels make a lot of money thanks to the city's refugee program. But before getting into the subject, I would like to make an incision and invite you to discover important issues that are not easy to deal with on the giants of social networks, but that can avoid gigantic scares. I tell you, in recent years something scandalous has been uncovered that has been happening for a long time. This is not so well known, except for specialists. But it is about the collaboration between pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities and the drug industry. I leave you below, or here, the link to a problem that is so vast that it can hardly be described in a single opinion article. However, I believe that everyone should be aware if they intend to protect their loved ones. Please read it carefully and stay informed if you do something. More than a dozen leaders and operators of the Democratic Party, strategists, distrust that President Biden can beat former President Donald Trump in November in the electoral battle. The media of the Democratic political trend, like all that we are going to say from now on, indicates that anxiety has turned into palpable fear when only five months remain for the electoral day. The media explains that one thing is what the Democrats are saying on television and in the press, and another very different thing is what they reserve for their allies. And it is that they are increasingly concerned that Biden cannot win in the polls. The article implies that it is so much so that they have already given up, that is, that they already give it up for impossible, that they already give it up for lost. One of the anonymous sources of Politico assures that the bad polls, among other things, are generating panic. In fact, former President Trump wins in practically all the polls of the states that until now were disputed by Democrats and Republicans. According to Mishtaq, Trump leads in five key states while young Hispanic and black voters show discontent with Biden, according to the New York Times, which assures that this base of young Hispanic and black voters is of vital importance, because Democratic victories have always been based on it. A CNN analyst, Harry Enten, was visibly consterned when citing the statistics in front of the cameras, said, My God, it's a huge advantage. No Democrat has lost that state since John Kerry. To top it off, the former Republican senator has aggravated the situation by campaigning and having a good reception in territories assured by Democrats such as California, New Jersey or New York. Something that the media has baptized as a psychological war. As for the rollback, last month, after a long time in the saga, Mr. Trump's campaign also surpassed that of Mr. Biden by 25 million. Then, an advisor to the greatest Democratic donors decided to assess the situation and made a list with more than a dozen reasons why President Biden could fail in the 2024 elections. These range from the migration crisis to inflation, price increases, going through the president's advanced age and the unpopularity of his formula partner Kamala Harris. The incorporation of third-party candidates such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. does not help him either. This donor advisor, also anonymous, added the following according to the media. The list of why we could win is so small that I don't even need to save it on my phone. And in this framework of donations, I would also underline the possible political instrumentalization of the government agencies recently denounced by the former governor of Mississippi, Phil Bryant, who now serves as campaign finance director for Donald Trump in Mississippi. Bryant said, I have spoken to very rich people who God has blessed and who say, I can't donate money to Donald Trump because the FBI would show up at my door. Peter Giangreco, a veteran Democratic strategist who has worked in many presidential campaigns, asks that the attacks against Trump's campaign be redirected to battlegrounds, such as abortion, to recover the lost ground. And he adds the following. If the framework of this race is that it was better three and a half years under Biden or four years under Trump, we will lose every day of the week and twice on Sunday. In this context, the writer, film producer and presenter Dinesh D'Souza supposedly published a comparative table of inflation rates or price increases in different sectors, both in the Trump era and in the current Biden era. Yesterday, both the accusation and the defense of former President Trump presented their final allegations before the jury withdrew from releasing the sentence of the so-called case of money in exchange for silence. The retired Harvard professor and expert constitutionalist lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who attended the hearing, claims that the Manhattan prosecutor's office, Elvin Bragg, said at least two lies. In the trial, Prosecutor Bragg accuses the ex-manager of 34 criminal charges for paying his ex-adviser and lawyer Michael Cohen, in compensation, after he bought from his own pocket, the silence of an adult film actress. Apparently, this threat goes with airing that he had had a supposed adventure with the former president, something that the latter strongly denies. The prosecution employs a novel technique to turn a alleged crime of falsification of commercial records into a serious class crime. It claims that Mr. Trump falsified the invoices of the payments in exchange for silence to exert influence, in some way, in the 2016 elections, although to date the crime has not been revealed in particular. When asked by the prosecution, it says that, as the law does not force them to reveal the crime, they will not do it. But the whole case revolves around that crime, that is, the whole case revolves around that crime, a second crime that is unknown, but that makes sense to everyone, and that has turned a minor crime of falsification of commercial records into a major crime. It sounds complicated, but it is as it is. Now, Mr. Dershowitz says that the office of Prosecutor Bragg deceived the jury twice yesterday. In his program of Rumble, about the testimony of Mr. Cohen, the ex-adviser and ex-lawyer of Mr. Trump, who has become a star witness to the accusation, said the following. The case of the government simply falls apart because of its own weight, and the prosecution is deceiving the jury when it says that everything Cohen says is corroborated. Yes, everything Cohen says is corroborated, except for the two main points, except for what makes it a crime. What is not corroborated is his testimony that he told Trump that he would include these things as legal expenses instead of refunds, and that Trump knew everything. Those are the two things that are not corroborated, so the prosecution is deceiving the jury when it presents that final allegation. The other lie, according to him, is that the prosecutors told the jury that Trump would not have been elected president in 2016 if the issue of Stormy Daniels, the actress of adult movies, had come to light. And he added. Having sex with a porn star would have some effect in the elections? I mean. How could the prosecution afford to claim to the jury that this would have changed the elections? Would this have caused Hillary Clinton to be elected president instead of Donald Trump? The expert assured that saying that is exaggerating so much that no reasonable jury could ever take it into account. I leave you a link below or here to an article about the performance of Trump's lawyer who claimed that the witness of the trial lied and asked the jury to declare him innocent. Representative Elise Stefanik, a Republican from New York, has filed a complaint against the judge who oversees the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump in New York. She claims that he was not randomly elected as the law dictates. Ms. Stefanik, who is one of the candidates to become vice president of the former president if he wins the general elections in November, wrote the following in a letter. The possible misconduct points to the appointment, again and again, of the interim judge, Juan Merchan, who is a donor of the Democratic Party, to criminal cases related to President Donald J. Trump and his allies. He also presided over the criminal trial against the Trump Organization and will preside over the criminal trial of Steve Bannon, the main advisor of President Trump in the White House. Ms. Stefanik pointed out in her letter that there are around three dozen judges to whom it could have been chosen to oversee the cases of the former president and favorite Republican candidate for presidency. However, they selected Judge Merchan, who is an interim judge for all three, and added If the magistrates were indeed randomly assigned in the criminal trial, the probability that two specific criminal cases are assigned to the same judge is quite low, and the probability that three specific criminal cases are assigned to the same judge is infinitely small. And yet we see Judge Merchan in all three cases. In her letter she also referred to the donations of Judge Merchan to the Democratic Party and President Joe Biden, and that the judge's daughter is in charge of a consulting firm that works with Democratic officials, and wrote the following One cannot fail to suspect that the random selection with which Judge Merchan was assigned, a donor of the Democratic Party, to these cases involving prominent Republicans, in fact, was not random at all. In a statement to the media, the New York Judicial Office said that Judge Merchan was assigned the criminal case of Trump following the standard protocol. First, she was assigned to supervise the great special judges who investigated the Trump Organization, Allen Weisselberg and Donald Trump, and that she was assigned the accusations that arose from those investigations. This, they said, is a common practice, since the judge who supervises the investigation of the great judge already has a certain familiarity with these cases, often complex, and can handle them more efficiently. The ex-president's lawyers also accused the judge of having a conflict of interest because her daughter advises the Democrats. But he refused to refuse the trial, and the Court of Appeals would end up giving him the reason. Judge Merchan then issued a silent order against President Trump at the beginning of this year. She alleged that her comments, both on social networks and in public, would exert an undue pressure on possible witnesses, members of the jury and other people related to the trial. According to the order, President Trump can still criticize the judge and the district attorney of Manhattan, Alvin Brack, who presented the case, but to a few more people related to the case and not to the judge's daughter. Mr. Trump's lawyers say that this trial, as well as the other three, are part of a plan to interfere with the 2024 elections. The ex-president, who declared himself innocent, said that the trial is also an attempt to prevent him from doing his electoral campaign for the 2024 presidential elections, and that it is designed in its entirety to reduce his chances of re-election. The jury has already started its deliberations today, after both the prosecution and the defense presented their final allegations in the case. Meanwhile, President Trump still has not publicly declared whom he could elect as his formula partner for 2024, but the media have fed the hypothesis, the idea, that Stefanik could be competing for the position. Previously, the Republican said that it would be an honor to serve the Trump administration in any position. Here below I leave you a link, in the description, and here, about the reaction of the Court of Appeals to the attempt of Hunter Biden to cancel the charges for possession of weapons, something recent. While the jury evaluates the 34 charges against Trump for the alleged serious crime of falsification of commercial records in the first criminal trial in history against an American president, the accused and Republican favorite to the presidential elections assures that not even Mother Teresa could face the charges that have been launched against him Meanwhile, Carlos Arellano, a former employee of hotel services, assures that housing illegal immigrants in luxury hotels has become a very lucrative business for many people. He assures that everyone is delighted because the money does not stop circulating. Now that room prices have increased to between 150 and 200 dollars per night, more than 130 hotels participate in the program. Fox said that although most of the staff has become inactive, their salaries are still active. He described how the staff does nothing, but the hotels keep charging the city for anything. He assures that only two out of ten workers are actually working. For Mr. Arellano, profits are going hand in hand with lies. And he denounces that both politicians and hotel owners are pretending to regret the situation, but that everyone is delighted because the money does not stop circulating. But paying for these high-standing accommodations has its consequences. In fact, hotels charge between 139 and 185 dollars per night per room, whether it is occupied or not. And this curious treatment of the migration crisis has led Mayor Eric Adams to implement cuts in other areas. For the moment, he has closed libraries on Sundays and frozen police contracts due to lack of funds. Meanwhile, the figures of the migration crisis are still alarming. The number of illegal immigrants that the Border Patrol finds in the US soil before arresting and releasing them increased from 1.6 million in 2021 to 2.2 million in 2022 and from 2 million in 2023 to 1.1 million in 2024. In short, the controversial network of luxury hotels that host illegal immigrants in New York leaves a great trail of money in which all those involved profit while the city faces increasing economic and social challenges. Well, this has been our episode today. Thank you for tuning in. If you like our program, please don't forget to like, subscribe and share this video with your friends and family because everyone deserves to know the facts. Once again, thank you for watching. See you tomorrow.