分子生物學否定進化論

In the 19th century when evolution theory was born, biology remained at the macro level With the development of molecular biology at the end of the 20th century People only understood the mystery of the world of DNA under the microscope But the micro world did not officially evolve Instead, it brought a lot of contradictions with evolution theory to scientists This is also the reason why evolution theory encountered a huge crisis after the 20th century Today, let's briefly share the molecular biology crisis of evolution theory The collapse of life According to the theory of evolution All living things on the earth come from a source of life evolution Fish climb land from water lilies and become reptiles Reptiles become mammals This kind of evolution hypothesis can be drawn into the form of a tree It's called biological evolution The most famous hypothesis on evolution is drawn by Hecker in the 19th century He also drew a famous embryo reenactment It was found to be fake in 1997 Then deleted from high school biology textbooks We continue to talk about evolution In the 19th century, scientists divided species based on macro So now there is no genetic evidence for the differentiation of species on the textbook Species are classified according to their macro-similarity Smaller categories are gradually increasing Categories such as sheep, steel, man, and concubine For example, the image of a horse and a donkey is divided into a section called a horse The image of a man and a black star is divided into a section called a leader There is no genetic evidence for these categories This evolutionary tree is entirely based on subjective feelings To verify the evolutionary relationship between different species Draw a real evolutionary tree It must be used to compare the gene set or protein set In order to give a more scientific conclusion from the objective level Scientists can use protein DNARNA at the molecular level to compare In theory, using different molecules should produce the same result And should show a simple to complex evolutionary relationship However, the ideal is beautiful Reality tells us that there is no biological evolutionary tree What's going on Let's take a look at the results of another year's scientific research A study in 1996 used 88 protein sequences to compare The study actually shows that rabbits are closer to the leader Instead of the previously thought of carnivores Are people evolved from little rabbits? A study in 1998 Analyze the 13 genes of 19 animal species Return the sea urchin to a few animals Instead of the previously thought of a few animals How are the spine and five spines classified as a species? This classification is too confusing Another study in 1998 based on 12 proteins shows Cow and whale are closer Instead of horse It seems that the appearance does not mean that it is closer to the gene There is also a study on the c-protein of the gene cell The proximity of chicken and duck is not as close as that of chicken and dog Mammals are more similar to humans than to black stars No wonder the head of the Mari Lanzo-Rockwell Genome Research Institute, TIGER Karel Freize will comment Nothing is more ridiculous than this In 1999, an article by French biologist Hervé With more and more sequences to be used The fact is that most proteins are contradictory to each other RNA evolution is also full of contradictions In 1999, molecular biologist James Reich and others In a particular article, he described this in detail Scientists began to analyze various genes from different organisms Found that DNA evolution contradicts RNA evolution In 2000, an article published in the American National Academy of Sciences said DNA analysis subverted past cognition The complex biological classification group that was once thought to be the late animal tree Is being transferred to the earlier position on the tree It means that these complex organisms appeared earlier Due to the change in the position of a large number of organisms, the biological connection is lost The hole in the evolutionary tree is getting bigger and bigger The author said We have lost the common hope in the primitive evolutionary reasoning In 2012, a study by Dutch university seaweed expert Desma showed In the past, the seed classification of brown seaweed was incorrect The evolutionary tree should almost be completely overturned Genetic analysis of simple species is even later than that of complex species This is completely contrary to the path described by evolutionary theory In fact, the classification of these species is no longer a rare thing Contradictions have caused many scientists to have doubts about evolutionary theory In 1999, an article in the academic journal Science said Is it time to pull out the number of lives? The article pointed out that biologists have not yet identified the number of lives And genetic analysis and comparison In fact, the opposite result Biologists have looked at a new set of genes for a dozen micro-organisms They think these data may support the early history of recognized life But what they see confuses them Comparison of usable genes Not only did not clarify how the main group of life evolved Instead, it makes this picture more confusing In 2000, biologist Carl Woese, who has a reputation in Illinois University, admitted In the face of molecular discovery, the concept of evolutionary tree has lost its meaning So far, many individual protein life trees have been produced There has not yet been a consistent biological evolutionary tree In the evolutionary tree, you can see the uncoordination of the structure everywhere Molecular biologist Jonathan Weerse summarized the situation of the past two thousand years The inconsistency between evolutionary trees based on different molecules And some strange numbers generated by molecular analysis Has put molecular systemology in crisis That is to say, the comparative study of molecular biology based on evolutionary theory Has lost its meaning Without this scientific evidence Can evolutionary theory be called science? It has always been a fantasy and fantasy Today in the 21st century Can we put down evolutionary theory Can biology take a step forward? That's all for today's sharing See you next time