化石記錄否定人類從猿進化！

In the movie, Lucy, played by Scarlet, gained superpowers. She went back to the beginning of humanity and saw the process of the original monkey's transformation into a human being. This Hollywood big change has made a lot of advertising for evolution theory. The front page of the propaganda is full of movies, information and media. People's superstition about evolution theory has become a kind of cultivation that modern people should have. The origin of this kind of cognition comes from the education of human sources in school. According to the textbook, today's human beings evolved for human beings. This imaginary human evolution family is described as four stages. Nafang ancient source, capable man, upright man and wise man. According to the textbook, Nafang ancient source is believed to be the earliest species of humans separated from the source. It is classified as human science. The biggest difference from the original science is that it can walk upright. Capable people are believed to have the ability to make tools. Upright people have the ability to walk upright. But the state of life is very primitive. Wise man is today's human species. Such fossils often appear in the media, such as diggers, Beijing people and Lucy. And can be found in the textbooks and textbooks of evolution theory. They are one of the four categories listed above. However, a large number of research has denied the definition of the human family tree and the idea of ​​progressive development. What are the mistakes in this family tree? Let's look at it one by one. Nafang ancient source is not a human ancestor. The first to face the crisis is Nafang ancient source. As the idea of ​​human ancestors, Nafang ancient source is a kind of extinct species. The structure of the skull and skull is very similar to the black star. The scientists of evolution theory guess that this kind of human may walk upright. So it may be a human ancestor. Lucy is the representative of this hypothesis ancestor. Called the human grandmother She is the American ancient humanist Tom Nader Johnson. In 1974, the fossil found in the Great Valley of East Africa. Belongs to Nafang ancient source In the British Museum. The image of an upright person made into clothes. However, many studies have confirmed that Lucy cannot walk upright. In terms of body structure, it is a real source. Not at all related to humans Before Lucy appeared in 1970. Two world-famous anthropologists from the United Kingdom and the United States. Professor Zuckerman Hsuanjue and Charles For various Nafang human specimens Conducted a 15-year study. Confirmed that Nafang ancient source cannot walk upright like humans. In 1994, anthropologist Fred Slipp. Bernard Wood and others By comparing the human and the original Neel Maintain a balanced semicircular tube Confirmed that Nafang ancient source does not support the Neel structure that walks upright. And only make people have this structure May 1999 The French journal Science and Life. Use Lucy as its cover story. The title is Goodbye Lucy. And wrote that it was necessary to remove the Nafang ancient source from the human genealogy. The article pointed out that the Nafang ancient source is not the source of the human genealogy. In a visit to the Nature journal in 2015. The discoverer of Lucy's fossil, Charles Hanson, also admitted. Nafang ancient source Lucy is not a missing link between the original and the human. Can't be considered a human ancestor 2. The Nafang ancient source is not a human. The second existence of the human genealogy The Nafang ancient source is also questioned. Nafang is actually a kind of extinct original. This kind of name was proposed by the fossil hunters. In the 1960s. According to the Ligyi couple. This species named by them. Relatively large brain capacity Ability to walk upright And the ability to use stones and wooden tools So it could be a human ancestor. A large number of Nafang fossils were discovered after 1980. After analysis, researcher Wooder and Bress believe. The Nafang ancient source should be classified as the Nafang ancient source. Because the Nafang ancient source and the Nafang ancient source have many common characteristics. It has a long arm, short legs and a human skeleton structure. Just like the Nafang ancient source. Its fingers and toes are suitable for climbing. Their chin is very similar to today's human beings. The average brain capacity is 600 ml. Similar to the Nafang ancient source Three times different from humans This also shows that they are people, not people. Wooder and Bress's research in the following years showed. The structure of the Nafang ancient source and the Australian ancient source is consistent. It should not be regarded as a new species. In 1994, American humanist Horley Smith. After analyzing the teeth of the Nafang ancient source, Nafang ancient source and Neanderthal, it was confirmed. The Nafang ancient source is not a human being, but a clear source. Smith said. If the chemical analysis is limited to these standard specimens. The Nafang ancient source and Nafang ancient source can be classified as African ancient sources. Neanderthal and Neanderthal are classified as human beings. In the same year, anthropologist Fred Slipp and others. By analyzing the semicircular ducts that maintain balance in the inner ear. It also proves that the capable person does not support the Neanderthal structure of walking upright. This negates the assumption that the capable person can walk upright. So the capable person is not a human being, but a real source. 3. The upright person is the third class in the wisdom of the family. The classification of upright people also exists in great controversy. Upright people are very different from the previous two species. But it is very similar to today's human beings. In the skeletal structure, this species can walk completely upright. The skull is the same as today's human beings. The brain capacity is slightly smaller than today's human beings. The biggest feature is that there are large eyebrows. However, in today's world, many people have the same brain capacity as upright people. For example,比格蜜人 And some of today's races, such as Australian aborigines. There are also prominent eyebrows. The planner Richard immediately pointed out. The difference between upright people and modern people is just a racial difference. People will also see the shape of the skull and the prominence of the face. The difference in the roughness of the eyebrows. These differences may not be compared to the modern people we see today. The difference between different ethnicities is more obvious. In 2000, it was published in the American Scientist magazine. As a result of a discussion on this issue. Most of the participants in the Sankenberg Conference. All entered a heated debate on the classification of upright people. This debate was initiated by Neil Fulton Wolff of Michigan University. Ellen Soren of Canberra University and her colleagues. They pointed out in a powerful way. As a species, upright people should not be completely removed. All human species from about 2 million years ago to now. It has always been a species with a relatively large difference in human species. There is no natural middle section or subdivision. The conclusion of the conference is that upright people do not exist. The above conclusion can be summarized as. Upright people are not different species from upright people. It is a race within the upright people. On the other hand, there is a huge gap between upright people and southern ancient people and capable people. This means that in the fossil record. The first batch of humans suddenly appeared. And there is no previous evolutionary history. Summarizing the previous three studies, it can be concluded. The first two species of the human family are real human species. The latter two species are real human species. So there is no evolutionary relationship between upright people. All discoveries and scientific research show. The fossil record does not prove that there is any evolutionary process between species. Today's sharing is here. See you next time.