為證明進化論做實驗，反證實進化論錯誤！

The basis of science is evidence In more than a hundred years of evolutionary theory Proof that this hypothesis has become the top priority in biology However, after Mendel inherited the knowledge and genetic knowledge Later, the ability to be confirmed cannot be passed on to the next generation Evolutionary theory suffered the first crisis Thus, the birth of new Darwinism after the improvement Claiming that species rely on gene mutation and natural selection to evolve But various experiments not only did not prove evolutionary theory Instead, it accumulated countless anti-evolutionary evidence Today we are going to learn about an evolutionary experiment Large Intestine Genetic Mutation Experiment The experiment was designed by American evolutionary biologist Richard Lenski Using large intestinal bacteria as the material The experiment is to conduct long-term observations through the mutation of large intestinal bacteria Hope to get a natural gene mutation If new bacteria can be produced in the experiment Can prove evolutionary theory Bacteria reproduce fast Can reproduce 6 to 7 generations a day The experiment is expected to reproduce 2,000 generations and there will be a risky result However, it actually reproduced 74,500 generations Did not evolve into a new species Let's summarize the main experimental progress since 1988 In 2013, the laboratory published an article in the famous academic journal Science The experiment was done for 25 years Large intestinal bacteria reproduced 58,000 generations No new bacteria were produced In 2015, the journal Bloss Biology published an article The experiment was done for 27 years Large intestinal bacteria reproduced more than 60,000 generations No new bacteria were produced In 2017, the journal Nature published an article The experiment was done for 29 years Large intestinal bacteria reproduced more than 60,000 generations No new bacteria were produced In 2022, the experiment was done for 34 years Large intestinal bacteria reproduced 74,000 generations No new bacteria were produced Through this experiment People witnessed large intestinal bacteria in 32 years Reproduction of more than 70,000 generations Still has not evolved into another new species If we compare the life of large intestinal bacteria with the reproduction cycle of humans The 30 years of large intestinal bacteria At least equal to more than 1 million years of humans New species can not evolve for more than 1 million years Where did the more than 10 million creatures on the earth come from? This experiment was originally intended to verify evolutionary theory In the end, it made people more suspicious of evolutionary hypotheses In addition, reproduction to about the 6,500th generation Two types of large intestinal bacteria appeared in one of the burns One type of reproduction is relatively weak The bacteria fall relatively small The other type of reproduction is relatively strong The production of bacteria is relatively large Experimenter Lenski originally expected If Darwin's natural selection The theory of superiority and inferiority is correct Bacteria with stronger reproductive power will be more and more powerful Eventually replace bacteria with weaker reproductive power But the result surprised him These two types of bacteria continue to exist and coexist This is another denial of evolutionary hypothesis And denied Darwin's natural selection The view of the survivor British chemist who won three scientific doctorates Professor Arthur Ernest Wilder Smith Published in 1981 Natural science has no knowledge of evolution Seven main assumptions of New Darwinism None of them can be confirmed None of them can be verified by experiments If there is no evidence to support the experiment The whole theory is difficult to be regarded as science If the seven assumptions of New Darwinism cannot be proven by experiments It should be regarded as philosophy, not science Because science should be able to use experiments to verify things In other words, the evolution theory that dominates the world of science Can't be verified by science At present, it is just a concept of philosophical discussion Not real science That's all for today's sharing See you next time