Đột biến tạo ra Thông tin mới như thế nào? [Patricia Engler]

From its inception theory of credibilism has been hastily introduced to the public in a systematic manner However it has always faced strong opposition from the beginning The theory of deification itself contains many contradictions Today science has advanced greatly and fossils continue to be discovered Humanity has come far enough to have sufficient insight to assess whether theory of belief is correct or not Many scientists have found their own answers The process of deification does not exist A large number of scientists once believed but theory of deification has gradually shifted to believe that There must be an intelligence that creates all things not just random processes Genetic mutation is a term you can find in textbooks or other materials about theory of evolution It is a change in the information in an organism's DNA This change will produce new varieties of the species and these genetic variations are considered the basis of the process of sensitization But is it really as correct and reasonable as were taught Watch the following short analysis video to find out Why do mutations usually not create new useful information Welcome to the Critical Thinking Scan where we will examine how you think about any message that challenges your faith And come to a reasonable conclusion based on the Bible I am Patricia Engler Today we use science to observe why mutations tend to be destructive They instead create new functional genetic information As seen in episode 76 it has been more than enough challenge to try to explain Why can language systems such as the genetic code develop naturally from the beginning and it is even more difficult to explain the meaningful communication messages such as genetic codes that exist in mutual dependence With those products of the messages such as protein An article about the controversy of the concept of signaling What is the evolutionary motivation behind the concept of signaling What is the function of the extremely complex protein coating system in DNA And of course there can't be protein without an efficient translation system A series of hypotheses have been proposed in an effort to break this cycle of repetition But so far none of these have seemed sufficiently rigorous or received full support to establish their position of a truly effective theory Complex challenges because unlike regular sentences that convey a single message a DNA segment can contain multiple layers of information Geneticist Dr Jonathan Sanford described DNA as follows Imagine a sentence with a normal structure There is a specific message but it also has an equivalent coherent message when read backward Now suppose it also has a third message when we read the letters and the fourth message When using a simple encryption program to eliminate it He explained that messages with multiple layers of meaning have various levels of constraints or limitations But future changes can still happen In other words they are multi-constrained He Sanford continued we know that a single error in a sentence will not improve the message but at least this one It is still possible However a message with many constraints is attractive in that aspect It cannot be improved it can only deteriorate Any spelling errors that can improve the ordinary sentence It will also disrupt other information layers Because DNA encryption is a multi-constraint system it helps explain why many mutations It turns out to be more harmful than beneficial And although natural selection does not necessarily quickly eliminate harmful mutations or accurate enough to keep the gene sources from becoming more and more degraded over time A situation of dilemma is called a movement degeneration Therefore the evolution we see happening is not upwards But rather it is going down Because the mutation causes a complete loss of eye information movement function According to the hypothesis mutations may create The new information is limited to some extent But is that information functionally useful It's another story To illustrate let me tell you about the time a typographical error turned into a mutation He sent me some new information One year while attending an online class I had to take my exams Through a local library I lost my exam schedule So I emailed the library to ask when They scheduled my next exam The librarian replied that the exam is on March 4th which is the day after I had a night of panic reviewing only to realize that the textbook had a serious error She intended to write March 14 but erased the 1 This is an information loss where a digit was erased The results can be considered new information or at the very least different information because the mutated email announced an entirely different exam day You can even call this a beneficial mutation because it makes me study harder But in the end email had lost its original meaning and purpose which was to inform me of my actual exam date And even with this serious mistake the email about the exam is still the email about the exam It has not become a mystery novel There is a book on how to build a rocket or even a simple pancake recipe Because that requires adding new functional information But for humans to quantify from microorganisms it would also require such information Therefore where mechanisms such as mutations can change This kind of organism into another kind of organism is like saying random spelling mistakes over millions of years can change the email about the exam date To become a multi-layered meaningful and constrained guide without any guidance of wisdom or intelligence This illustrates the issue that has long been acknowledged that mutations generate new types and the amount of new genetic information required From the evolution of molecules to humans Next we will examine in detail some common examples of the information that is considered new Thank you for watching