James O’Keefe Denounces Minnesota Felony Charges Over Undercover Investigation of Voter Vouching Sys

Investigative journalist James O’Keefe says felony charges against him and Cam Higby for their undercover reporting at Minnesota polling stations threaten First Amendment protections, while prosecutors allege the pair illegally impersonated registered voters during the August primary election.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom

MINNEAPOLIS — Investigative journalist James O’Keefe is challenging felony charges filed against him and fellow conservative commentator Cam Higby over an undercover investigation of Minnesota’s voter vouching system, arguing that the prosecution threatens journalists’ constitutional rights to investigate government operations and expose potential election vulnerabilities.

The charges, announced Wednesday, Oct. 28, by Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, stem from an Aug. 11 operation in which O’Keefe and Higby visited multiple polling locations while recording interactions with election workers about the state’s voter registration procedures.

According to the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, both men face felony counts of unlawful voting and identity theft after allegedly providing election judges with the names of registered voters without those individuals’ knowledge or consent.

Neither man cast a ballot or signed a voter eligibility oath, a distinction O’Keefe has emphasized in defending the investigation.

In a statement circulated on X following the announcement, O’Keefe rejected the allegations and characterized the prosecution as a challenge to investigative journalism.

<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start"> </span><br>

“This is not political. It is fundamental. It is about whether citizens still have the right to question their government. This is now a landmark First Amendment case, and every American’s right to speak truth to power has been put on the line,” O’Keefe said.

The investigation involved Minnesota’s voter vouching law, which allows registered voters to verify the residential address of another eligible voter seeking to register on Election Day.

Under the procedure, a registered voter from the same precinct can vouch for as many as eight people by signing an oath confirming their residence. The person being registered must also complete the required eligibility documentation.

O’Keefe and Higby said their operation was intended to examine whether individuals could exploit those procedures by providing election workers with names and addresses belonging to other registered voters.

The pair filmed themselves visiting Hennepin County polling stations while wearing disguises and speaking with election judges about the registration process.

Videos released afterward showed interactions in which they attempted to determine whether election workers would permit them to register or vouch for additional voters without presenting conventional photo identification.

The investigators maintained that their actions exposed weaknesses in the system, while Minnesota election officials disputed that interpretation.

Moriarty said the central issue was not whether O’Keefe and Higby actually voted, but whether they intentionally misrepresented their identities while beginning the ballot application process.

“It’s a multi-step process,” Moriarty said, according to FOX 9 Minneapolis. “They did begin to apply. I mean, that’s clear. When you walk in, and you say to the election judge, ‘I am so-and-so’ and you are not that person, and ‘I am here to vouch,’ that is part of the application process.”

Prosecutors allege the pair used the identities of actual registered voters without obtaining their permission.

Minnesota law prohibits intentionally misrepresenting one’s identity when applying for a ballot, depositing a ballot or attempting to vote using an election system.

The prosecution’s position is that the alleged misrepresentation itself violated the law, regardless of whether a completed ballot was submitted.

O’Keefe, however, said the criminal charges would provide an opportunity to challenge the government’s interpretation of the law and scrutinize its election procedures.

“Weaponized lawfare does not work against me. It has always backfired on the people who come after me. Most people find criminal charges and lawsuits stressful; the process becomes a form of punishment. But I love this process because it gives me the opportunity to expose injustice at the highest levels. My foundation will be indemnifying members of the Justice League, including Cam Higby for their lawful reporting,” O’Keefe said.

Higby also denied committing a crime.

“This investigation was conducted to expose vulnerabilities in the Minnesota voting system, which affects all Americans. I never voted, I never signed an affidavit, and I never violated a law,” Higby said in a statement reported by CBS Minnesota.

Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon defended the state’s election procedures, arguing that polling places must remain secure and that election officials appropriately identified suspicious conduct.

“Any attempt to disrupt or deceive our election workers will not be tolerated. We are grateful to our law enforcement partners for holding these individuals to account,” Simon said.

State officials maintain that voter vouching is a lawful registration procedure subject to eligibility requirements and penalties for false statements.

Election administrators have also noted that the process accounts for a relatively small proportion of Minnesota voting activity, representing fewer than 0.6% of votes cast in 2024.

O’Keefe, who founded Project Veritas and now leads O’Keefe Media Group, has conducted numerous undercover investigations involving political organizations, government agencies and private institutions.

His defense centers on the argument that his activities were journalistic efforts to examine election procedures rather than genuine attempts to cast unlawful ballots.

The prosecution maintains that investigative motives do not exempt individuals from laws prohibiting identity misrepresentation during the voting process.

Each man faces one count of unlawful voting and one count of identity theft. Both charges are felonies carrying potential penalties of up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine per count, although actual sentences, if convictions occur, would depend on applicable Minnesota sentencing guidelines.

Moriarty said probation would likely be the presumptive outcome under those guidelines, rather than a lengthy prison sentence.

O’Keefe and Higby have not been convicted, and neither had entered a plea as of the announcement. Their initial court appearances are scheduled for Nov. 16.

O’Keefe concluded his response by urging journalists and members of the public to oppose what he described as an effort to intimidate investigators examining government institutions.

“I’m calling on all Americans, and especially all journalists, to stand united on a message to the prosecutors in Minnesota: the politics of fear will not prevail in the United States of America,” O’Keefe said.

The case will require the court to examine the defendants’ alleged conduct under Minnesota election law, including whether their use of other voters’ identities constituted unlawful ballot applications despite their stated investigative purpose and the absence of any ballots cast.