President Donald Trump joined the leaders of Denmark and Greenland in signing a new Arctic security agreement Tuesday that will expand U.S. military operations on Greenland while leaving sovereignty over the semiautonomous territory unchanged.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom.

President Donald Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen signed a trilateral security agreement Tuesday that will substantially expand the U.S. military presence in Greenland while keeping the Arctic territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

The agreement was signed on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York after months of negotiations prompted in part by Trump’s repeated calls for greater American control over Greenland.

WATCH:

“This is tremendous for Europe and for the United States and for everybody,” Trump said before the signing. “And for Greenland, it’s going to be incredible.”

The agreement strengthens U.S. access to Greenland for defense operations and is intended to bolster security in the Arctic and North Atlantic, according to Denmark’s government and reporting from The Associated Press and Reuters. It does not transfer sovereignty over Greenland to the United States.

Frederiksen said the agreement protects the political status of Greenland while strengthening security cooperation among NATO allies.

“Mr. President, you have been very clear: You don’t want adversaries to come too close,” Frederiksen said. “I fully agree.”

She described the agreement as a “deal that can last forever” and said it benefits the United States, Denmark, Greenland and NATO.

Nielsen offered a similar assessment.

“Your security is our security, and our security is your security,” he said, calling the pact “a win-win-win agreement.”

Denmark had previously said the agreement recognizes “the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people’s right to self-determination.”

The signing marked a change from the confrontation that dominated U.S.-Danish relations over Greenland for much of Trump’s second term.

Trump had repeatedly said the United States needed Greenland for national security and had suggested that Washington should acquire the territory before Russia or China increased their strategic presence in the Arctic.

His comments alarmed Danish and Greenlandic officials and generated concerns within NATO about tensions between alliance members.

The new agreement instead expands U.S. defense access without making Greenland American territory.

Trump did not answer reporters Tuesday when asked whether the possibility of the United States eventually acquiring Greenland was now permanently off the table.

Two New U.S. Military Locations Planned

Trump provided additional information about the pact during his Tuesday address to the U.N. General Assembly.

“We will immediately begin the process of developing a large military presence in the appropriate locations,” Trump said, including “building two very major military bases.”

Reuters reported that the agreement provides for a renewed U.S. presence at Narsarsuaq in southern Greenland and another military location at Mestersvig on the east coast.

Narsarsuaq was previously used by the United States during the Cold War, while Mestersvig is currently associated with Denmark’s Sirius Dog Sled Patrol and other government operations.

The United States already operates Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland.

Pituffik supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance operations for the United States and NATO.

The planned expansion would represent the most significant increase in permanent or semi-permanent U.S. military infrastructure on Greenland since the Cold War.

At the height of America’s Cold War presence, the United States operated 17 bases and installations on the island and stationed thousands of military personnel there.

That footprint steadily declined after the Soviet Union collapsed.

Today, roughly 200 U.S. military personnel are stationed at Pituffik, according to AP.

Agreement Emerged After Months of Tension

Trump’s pursuit of Greenland had strained relations with Denmark, which is both a NATO member and a longstanding U.S. ally.

He repeatedly argued that control of the island was necessary to prevent Russian or Chinese strategic expansion in the Arctic.

Though Trump sometimes said he preferred to acquire Greenland through negotiation, he also said earlier this year that “one way or the other, we’re going to have Greenland.”

Frederiksen repeatedly rejected the possibility of transferring sovereignty.

She warned that any attempt by one NATO country to seize territory from another would threaten the foundations of the alliance.

The political confrontation also caused concern among Greenland’s roughly 56,000 residents.

Greenland is largely self-governing but remains constitutionally part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Copenhagen retains responsibility for foreign affairs and defense, though Greenland has progressively gained greater authority over domestic matters.

The island’s strategic importance has grown as Arctic temperatures rise, sea ice retreats and new maritime routes become increasingly accessible.

Approximately two-thirds of Greenland lies within the Arctic Circle.

The island also contains significant deposits of critical minerals and rare earth elements, adding an economic dimension to the geopolitical competition surrounding it.

Officials from all three governments spent months working on a formula that could address Trump’s security concerns without transferring Greenlandic sovereignty.

Tuesday’s agreement appears to represent that compromise.

Reuters reported that the pact expands U.S. military access, includes provisions aimed at keeping hostile non-NATO powers from establishing military footholds in Greenland and updates the security framework built around the longstanding U.S.-Danish defense relationship.

Pact Builds on Decades-Old Defense Agreement

American military access to Greenland dates back decades.

The United States and Denmark signed a defense agreement in 1951 during the early Cold War, giving Washington broad rights to operate military facilities on the island.

That agreement was amended in 2004 as Greenland gained greater political autonomy.

The new security arrangement updates that framework while expanding American access to additional areas, according to Reuters.

Denmark’s government had said before Tuesday’s ceremony that the agreement would not formally enter into force until required national parliamentary procedures were completed.

The arrangement also places Greenland’s defense more clearly within a wider NATO strategy for the Arctic and North Atlantic.

Denmark has argued that Arctic security should be treated as a collective alliance responsibility rather than solely a U.S.-Greenland matter.

Russian military expansion across its Arctic territory and growing Chinese economic and scientific activity in the region have increased NATO’s focus on the far north.

Denmark Also Expanded U.S. Access at Home

The Greenland agreement follows another expansion of American military access within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Denmark’s parliament previously approved legislation implementing a defense cooperation agreement that gives U.S. forces broader access to designated military facilities in Denmark itself.

That arrangement originated in a 2023 agreement negotiated during the Biden administration.

Together, the Denmark and Greenland arrangements give the U.S. military greater flexibility across the North Atlantic and Arctic approaches to North America and Europe.

For Washington, Greenland is particularly important because of its location between the continental United States, Russia and Europe.

Early-warning radars and space-surveillance systems based there can detect missile launches and monitor satellites and other objects passing across polar trajectories.

Analysts Say Deal Resolves Sovereignty Dispute Without Ending Strategic Tension

Mikkel Runge Olesen, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute of International Studies, said the agreement allows Copenhagen and Nuuk to resolve the immediate crisis without surrendering Greenland.

He said Denmark and Greenland gained the possibility of “ending the crisis without compromising on sovereignty,” while the United States secured a “somewhat more favorable” security arrangement than it had under the existing defense framework.

Olesen cautioned that the political damage from the dispute may last beyond the agreement.

Relations between the United States, Denmark and Greenland “are likely to be haunted by this long after Trump leaves office, and the crisis is likely to have significant and lasting negative impact on transatlantic relations more generally,” he said.

“The lost trust will take decades to rebuild.”

That assessment is one analyst’s view rather than an official position of any of the three governments.

The leaders signing the agreement instead emphasized cooperation.

Frederiksen said it would strengthen the security of NATO and Europe while respecting Danish sovereignty and Greenlandic self-determination.

Nielsen presented the agreement as evidence that Greenland could strengthen its security relationship with Washington without changing its political status.

Trump described the agreement as a major security achievement for both sides of the Atlantic.

The pact therefore closes at least one chapter in a dispute that had raised the possibility of a deeper split between Washington and Copenhagen.

The United States will gain a much larger military footprint in Greenland, including two additional major facilities, while Denmark and Greenland retain sovereignty over the island.

What remains unresolved is whether Tuesday’s agreement ends Trump’s broader interest in U.S. ownership of Greenland.

Asked directly whether acquisition was now off the table, Trump did not answer.

For the moment, however, the three governments have replaced the argument over ownership with a defense arrangement that greatly expands America’s ability to operate militarily from one of the world’s most strategically important Arctic territories.

Original article