A federal judge has ordered the unsealing of extensive records from Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, potentially exposing previously undisclosed evidence involving Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell and other individuals connected to the case.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
Thousands of pages of long-sealed records from litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre could soon become public after a federal judge in Manhattan ordered the files unsealed.
The records come from Giuffre’s 2015 defamation lawsuit against Maxwell and include extensive discovery material, depositions and other evidence collected during the case, according to the New York Post.
Manhattan federal Judge Loretta Preska ordered the voluminous case files released last week, the Post reported Tuesday.
Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown, whose reporting helped bring renewed attention to Epstein’s activities, disclosed the ruling Tuesday in a Substack post.
Brown said she and the Miami Herald had spent nearly a decade seeking public access to the material, arguing that the records had been improperly kept under seal.
She wrote that she had been told the discovery contained “damning evidence against Epstein, Maxwell and other men,” according to the Post.
The ultimate significance of the documents will depend on what they contain once released. The Post report does not establish that any particular person will be accused of wrongdoing in the newly unsealed material, and appearing or being mentioned in Epstein-related records does not by itself demonstrate criminal conduct.
The underlying lawsuit arose after Maxwell accused Giuffre of fabricating allegations involving Epstein, Maxwell and others in an alleged sex-trafficking operation.
Giuffre responded by suing Maxwell for defamation.
Although the case was settled in 2017, substantial portions of the discovery and other court material remained inaccessible to the public.
Brown said the sealed records encompass tens of thousands of pages.
Among the material was evidence Giuffre submitted in support of allegations that Epstein and Maxwell were operating an underage sex-trafficking scheme, according to Brown and the Post.
Much of the material had been covered by a broad protective order imposed by the late Judge Robert Sweet, who originally presided over the litigation.
Brown wrote that Sweet considered the material sensitive and private and placed extensive portions of the case under seal.
The protective order covered not only evidence gathered through discovery but also hearings and judicial decisions, according to the Post.
Brown has argued that such sweeping secrecy was improper because court records generally carry a presumption of public access and because requests to keep particular documents sealed ordinarily require specific legal grounds.
That long-running transparency dispute culminated in Preska’s latest order.
Maxwell, 64, attempted last week to prevent the records from being released, according to the Post.
Preska rejected that effort.
Brown wrote that the judge concluded that the Epstein Files Transparency Act superseded arguments Maxwell had raised concerning grand-jury secrecy.
The unsealing could bring renewed attention to people whose names or relationships with Epstein and Maxwell appeared in the underlying litigation.
Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and attorney Alan Dershowitz were among prominent figures mentioned in connection with allegations arising from the case.
Their inclusion in records or allegations, however, does not establish that either committed a crime or other wrongdoing.
The principal figures in the litigation are no longer in the same circumstances they were when Giuffre filed suit more than a decade ago.
Maxwell is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence following her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking charges, according to the Post.
Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan federal jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
Giuffre died by suicide last year, the Post reported.
The coming release could provide a fuller record of the evidence developed during Giuffre’s lawsuit, including material concerning her allegations about Epstein and Maxwell’s trafficking activities and their relationships with other people.
But until the records are actually made public and reviewed, it remains uncertain which documents contain previously unknown information, who may be mentioned in them, or whether any newly disclosed material will substantiate allegations against additional individuals.
For now, Preska’s order marks a major development in a transparency fight that has lasted nearly a decade and could open one of the largest remaining collections of sealed material stemming from the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.
Original article
Comments