President Donald Trump said Abdul El-Sayed’s narrow Democratic primary win strengthens Republican Mike Rogers’ prospects in a Michigan Senate contest expected to play a major role in determining control of the chamber.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
President Donald Trump described Abdul El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary as “great news” for Republicans on Wednesday, arguing that the progressive nominee’s policies and political record will benefit former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers in the November general election.
El-Sayed narrowly defeated Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens after a race that finished far closer than pre-election polling had suggested. The Associated Press did not project El-Sayed as the winner until Wednesday morning.
He will now face Rogers, the former Michigan congressman and presumptive Republican nominee, in a contest expected to be among the country’s most competitive Senate races.
Trump responded to the primary result in a Truth Social post, portraying the Democratic outcome as favorable to the Republican Party.
“Great news for the Republican Party. El-Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race with the Socialist,” Trump wrote. “As usual, the Polls were way off on this one. She was not expected to do nearly as well as she did. Now, the Dumocrats crazy policies will only get worse!”
Trump’s remarks referred to the unexpectedly narrow margin between El-Sayed and Stevens. El-Sayed had entered the final stage of the primary appearing positioned for a more decisive victory, but Stevens performed substantially better than anticipated and kept the contest unresolved into Wednesday.
Rogers quickly moved to frame the general election as a sharp ideological choice for Michigan voters.
He said El-Sayed’s nomination would make the race a contest between “common sense” and “complete insanity.”
The Republican campaign is expected to focus heavily on El-Sayed’s progressive positions while presenting Rogers as the more conventional alternative in a state that could prove decisive in the national battle for Senate control.
El-Sayed’s victory also denied the nomination to Stevens, an incumbent House member who had received support from major Democratic establishment figures and was generally viewed as a more moderate general-election candidate.
The outcome leaves Michigan voters with two sharply contrasting nominees as both parties prepare for an expensive and closely watched campaign through November.
Republicans are likely to use El-Sayed’s policy positions and endorsements to argue that Michigan Democrats selected a nominee outside the political mainstream. Democrats, meanwhile, will seek to mobilize voters around El-Sayed’s progressive platform and dissatisfaction with Republican policies.
With the Senate’s balance of power at stake, the Rogers-El-Sayed matchup is expected to attract substantial national attention, campaign spending and involvement from party leaders during the remaining months before the general election.
Original article
Comments