Newly released documents claim intelligence officials withheld or minimized reports involving Chinese access to voter data, election-system vulnerabilities and suspected foreign interference before and after the 2020 election.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
Declassified intelligence released during President Donald Trump’s prime-time address Thursday alleges that senior CIA and FBI officials suppressed, softened or withheld information concerning Chinese access to American voter data and potential foreign election activity before the 2020 presidential election.
The disclosures raise questions about whether intelligence agencies kept politically sensitive findings from Trump, Congress and other government officials because some analysts feared the information could benefit him during the campaign, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation report.
The materials reportedly show that the Chinese government obtained more than 200 million voter-registration files from over a dozen states in 2020. They also describe raw FBI intelligence concerning an alleged Chinese plan involving fraudulent ballots for Joe Biden that was recalled before investigators could verify it.
The documents do not establish that China changed votes or altered the outcome of the election. They instead allege that senior officials limited the circulation or impact of intelligence about Beijing’s access to election data and other suspected influence activities.
Trump said the records showed that analysts altered material prepared for the Presidential Daily Briefing, the highly classified intelligence summary delivered to the president, who is informally described within the intelligence community as “Customer #1.”
“One email among intelligence analysts admitted that they had ‘deliberately massaged’ the Presidential Daily Briefing to withhold information regarding Chinese activities related to the election,” Trump said. “Another official inside the FBI wrote that she was running a ‘shadow government.’”
“All they kept saying is that ‘this is the most secure election of all time.’ A standard, very pat line,” Trump added.
The newly disclosed records were uncovered through a White House task force led by journalist John Solomon. The task force includes the U.S. Intelligence Board, and Trump’s intelligence chiefs reviewed the declassified materials.
Trump also alleged that China pursued other forms of political influence, including efforts to recruit American corporate leaders and bribe journalists to damage his election prospects.
The documents do not determine whether any Chinese activities affected the final result of the 2020 election.
The disclosures add to previously reported controversies surrounding the election, including the timing of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine announcement after Election Day and problems in Fulton County, Georgia, involving ballot-processing delays and a state finding concerning mishandled absentee ballot requests.
Trump has cited the new disclosures while pressing Congress to approve the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote and establish other election-related requirements. The measure has encountered opposition from congressional Democrats and some Republicans.
The FBI and CIA did not respond to requests for comment.
The CIA
Questions about China’s access to American election information previously surfaced through a heavily redacted April 2020 National Intelligence Council memorandum written by National Intelligence Officer Christopher Porter.
The document showed that Chinese intelligence had analyzed voter-registration information from multiple states. A dispute later emerged within the intelligence community over whether Beijing merely collected the data or acted upon it in an attempt to influence the election.
Porter led a group of analysts who concluded that China likely used its collection of American voter information. He attempted to issue a warning about the possible threat, but a senior National Intelligence Council manager and longtime CIA officer allegedly suppressed his assessment because of concerns about Trump’s forceful campaign rhetoric toward China.
The officials opposing Porter’s analysis ultimately prevailed.
In March 2021, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, who served under President Joe Biden, issued an intelligence assessment concluding that China did not interfere in the election.
A January 2021 memorandum by John Ratcliffe, who was completing his tenure as director of national intelligence during Trump’s first administration, also alleged that senior officials had minimized alternative assessments concerning Beijing.
Ratcliffe argued that an intelligence report was written to create the inaccurate impression that Porter was the only official who believed China had interfered.
CIA managers pressured analysts “to withdraw their support” for the alternative position “in an attempt to suppress it,” Ratcliffe wrote.
“Placing the NIO Cyber on a metaphorical island by attaching his name alone to the minority view is a testament to both his courage and to the effectiveness of the institutional pressures that have been brought to bear on others who agree with him,” Ratcliffe said.
The FBI
The declassified material also raises questions about the FBI’s handling of intelligence involving allegedly fraudulent Chinese driver’s licenses and possible election interference.
After intelligence emerged concerning fraudulent licenses, all raw reporting related to the 2020 election was required to pass through the Washington headquarters of then-FBI Director Christopher Wray.
In August 2020, an FBI field office produced a report alleging that Chinese authorities planned to send fraudulent driver’s licenses to sympathizers in the United States. The report was recalled through what officials described as an abnormal process one day after Wray told Congress that he had not seen evidence of large-scale voter fraud.
The Senate Judiciary Committee released documents in July 2025 describing the recall and alleging that FBI headquarters interfered with the investigation to protect Wray from political consequences.
An FBI official reportedly described the human source responsible for the information as “competent” and “authentic in his/her reporting.” The bureau’s confidence in the source’s own subsource was reportedly assessed in the “9-10 range,” and that subsource was said to have obtained the information from Chinese officials.
The intelligence followed public reports that U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers seized 19,888 counterfeit driver’s licenses shipped from China and Hong Kong. Most of the fraudulent identification documents depicted people of college age.
Because the FBI report was recalled, the allegation was never fully investigated, according to the released documents.
Election-System Vulnerabilities
The disclosed materials also address broader concerns about the security of voting equipment, electronic pollbooks, voter-registration databases and state and local election websites.
Voter-registration files always contain names and addresses. Depending on the state, the databases may also include full or partial Social Security numbers, driver’s license or state identification numbers, political affiliations, telephone numbers, email addresses, voting histories and voting methods, according to the National Association of Secretaries of State.
A separate January 2020 National Intelligence Council memorandum, also written by Porter, warned that a determined foreign adversary could exploit vulnerabilities in election infrastructure.
“A committed adversary could exploit access to these systems to disrupt election processes across the country,” the report stated.
The memorandum warned that voter-registration databases are particularly exposed because states generally maintain them on internet-connected systems designed for frequent access and updates.
“States house their voter registration databases predominantly on Internet-connected systems that are designed for easy access because maintaining up-to-date voter registration records is a nearly continuous process,” the memorandum stated. “Adversaries could alter data to potentially prevent individual voters or groups of voters from voting, causing delays on election day or forcing voters to use provisional ballots.”
Such interference would not necessarily require changing recorded votes. Manipulating registration files could prevent eligible voters from being immediately verified, delay polling-place operations or require affected voters to cast provisional ballots.
U.S. Intelligence and China
The declassified records have renewed scrutiny of whether the American intelligence community devoted sufficient expertise and attention to China while focusing heavily on Russia and terrorism.
Beijing has become increasingly aggressive in activities affecting American national security, including alleged efforts involving U.S. officials and activists, as detailed in reports about Chinese-linked training of state security personnel, political activism and strategic influence operations.
Additional concerns include Chinese purchases of property near U.S. military installations, the theft or smuggling of vaccine research and dangerous biological materials from American laboratories and the hacking of National Guard systems.
Former intelligence officials have said the United States maintained only a small group of China specialists for nearly 25 years, though that situation has recently begun to change.
Nicholas Eftimiades, a former intelligence officer who specialized in China during a 35-year career, said the intelligence community had only about a dozen genuine China experts from the 1990s through the mid-2010s. The federal government, by comparison, trained thousands of Soviet specialists during the height of the Cold War.
Whistleblowers have argued that institutional assumptions favoring free trade and broad scientific cooperation with China persisted within the sprawling $100 million American intelligence apparatus.
Other intelligence-community whistleblowers have alleged that political hostility toward Trump contributed to the suppression of intelligence involving China, including information concerning the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The pandemic and its economic consequences became defining issues in the 2020 presidential campaign. According to those whistleblowers, some evidence suggesting that research at a Chinese military-connected laboratory may have triggered the crisis never reached the president.
The declassified documents do not establish that Chinese activity changed the outcome of the 2020 election. They instead present allegations that intelligence concerning foreign access, influence operations and election-system vulnerabilities was deliberately minimized or withheld from senior officials and the public.
Trump’s disclosures are expected to increase pressure for congressional and criminal investigations into who controlled the intelligence, why certain reports were recalled or altered and whether political considerations influenced what was presented to the president.
Original article
Comments