By Blessing Nweke
China launched a nuclear-capable ballistic missile into the Pacific Ocean on Monday, prompting criticism from the United States and several regional allies over Beijing’s expanding military activities in the Indo-Pacific.
According to China’s state-run Xinhua News Agency, the missile, carrying a dummy warhead, was fired from a nuclear-powered submarine at 12:01 p.m. local time. Chinese authorities said the missile successfully landed within its designated target area but did not disclose the exact launch location or identify the missile type.
The U.S. administration said it closely monitored the launch and reaffirmed its commitment to the security of allies and partners across the region. State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott called on Beijing to engage in meaningful arms control discussions, saying Washington remains concerned about China’s growing military capabilities.
Australia, which received advance notification of the launch, condemned the test as destabilizing. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, speaking during a visit to Fiji, said the missile launch came amid China’s rapid military expansion and a lack of transparency about its strategic intentions. Her remarks followed the signing of a new defense alliance between Australia and Fiji aimed at strengthening regional security and countering Beijing’s growing influence.
Japan also expressed serious concern after Chinese authorities warned on Sunday that space debris from the launch could fall within Japan’s exclusive economic zone. Japanese officials later confirmed that the missile landed outside the zone and no damage was reported.
New Zealand described the launch as an unwelcome and troubling development. Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said Pacific nations have no interest in seeing the South Pacific used as a testing ground for missile capabilities.
The latest test is expected to heighten regional tensions as governments continue to monitor China’s military activities and call for greater transparency and dialogue to reduce security risks.
Original article


Comments