A New York Times Magazine report on Jeffrey Epstein’s final days said previously unseen handwritten jail notes showed Epstein repeatedly tried to identify information about Donald Trump that could be offered to prosecutors, but appeared to come up with little beyond personal criticism.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
A New York Times Magazine report examining Jeffrey Epstein’s final days in federal custody included previously unseen handwritten notes that, according to the report, showed Epstein tried to identify information about President Donald Trump that might be useful to prosecutors.
The article focused primarily on the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death in August 2019 at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, where he was awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Epstein’s death was ruled a suicide, though questions about the handling of the case have fueled years of public debate.
The report also addressed Epstein’s handwritten notes from jail and his discussions with attorneys about whether he could provide information to federal prosecutors in exchange for possible leniency.
According to the report, Trump’s name appeared only several times in the magazine’s lengthy account. Some references were used to identify other figures, including former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and former Attorney General Robert Barr. Other references related to Epstein’s attempts to determine whether he had information about Trump that could be used in talks with prosecutors.
“We obtained about a dozen pages of other notes handwritten by Epstein in jail that were also previously unseen — including some in which he tried and failed to come up with significant information he might have on Donald Trump to offer to prosecutors,” the report stated.
The report also described discussions between Epstein’s lawyers and federal prosecutors about a possible proffer, in which a defendant provides information that may be useful in other cases in exchange for possible leniency.
“His attorneys discussed with federal prosecutors the prospect of a proffer: giving them information that might be useful in other cases in exchange for the possibility of some leniency in his own. Epstein was particularly preoccupied with what he might have on Donald Trump, who was then serving his first term in office. Jotting on a legal pad, he returned to the president again and again, trying to dredge up anything to offer prosecutors. But his scribblings — ‘Trump is a total con artist — smoke & mirrors’ and ‘Never had money’— suggest that he could come up with little that wasn’t already known,” the report stated.
The notes, as described by the magazine, indicate that Epstein was looking for information about Trump while he was facing federal charges, but the report said the handwritten material appeared to contain little beyond criticism that was not already known.
The broader public record on Trump and Epstein has been the subject of years of scrutiny. A PolitiFact summary noted that the two men had moved in the same wealthy Palm Beach, Florida, social circles decades ago and later had a falling out sometime in the 2000s, before Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution involving a person under 18.
Trump has said he was not friends with Epstein after that period and has denied involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
The magazine report also revisited the disputed circumstances of Epstein’s death.
“At the time of his death, Epstein was alone in his cell in spite of clear guidance to the contrary, while the guards assigned to his section of the jail neglected to conduct their rounds for hours. The jail’s security-camera system partially failed, and the video it did record showed an orange blur — the color of an inmate’s uniform — moving toward Epstein’s corridor shortly before his death. After Epstein’s body was found, evidence from his cell was not cataloged carefully, and photographs and objects gathered there seemed difficult to reconcile with aspects of his autopsy report. Two pathologists present at that autopsy had differing interpretations of the injuries to his neck,” the report stated.
“There were so many people with an ostensible stake, one way or another, in Epstein’s death. Was it possible that all of this just happened?” the report asked.
The magazine ultimately presented Epstein’s death as the result of failures inside the jail rather than an elaborate homicide plot.
“The picture drawn most clearly by this new information is not the elaborate conspiracy that his murder would have required; rather, it is an unfortunate though not improbable convergence of longstanding institutional failures, human errors and chance events, which created an opportunity for Epstein to act on what was by then a well-established desire that he had already tried and failed to realize,” the report stated.
Still, the article acknowledged that the evidence has not ended public uncertainty about the case.
“In the end, the autopsy photos were like everything else in the Epstein case, offering more possibilities than conclusions,” the article stated. “Every question was easier to ask than to answer. It made the case the perfect petri dish for conspiracy theories, a space in which nothing could definitively be proved wrong, as long as someone wanted to believe in it.”
The report’s description of Epstein’s jail notes adds a new detail to the public record: while Epstein’s attorneys explored whether he could provide prosecutors with information useful to other cases, the report said Epstein repeatedly tried to identify information involving Trump but appeared unable to produce significant material.
The findings are likely to become part of the continuing political and legal debate over Epstein’s relationships, his death and the handling of his case.
Original article
Comments