Tender documents show the U.S. military is preparing a Marine Corps weapons and equipment stockpile in Victoria state, expanding American logistics capacity in Australia as tensions rise across the Indo-Pacific.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
The U.S. military is preparing to establish a permanent Marine Corps weapons and equipment stockpile in southeastern Australia, according to tender documents and officials cited by AFP, marking a new expansion of American military logistics in the Indo-Pacific.
The planned stockpile would be located on Australia’s southeast coast, outside the range of most Chinese missiles, and is expected to support U.S. Marine Corps operations and exercises across the region. The project would be the first Marine Corps land-based prepositioned stockpile in Australia.
Documents published this month by the U.S. Navy show $30 million has been allocated to build warehouses and offices in southeastern Victoria state for what the documents describe as “critical forward provisioning.”
The stockpile is expected to reach full capacity by 2028. It will initially be kept in Melbourne before being moved to U.S. warehouses scheduled for construction next year at an Australian military base in Bandiana, a rural area of Victoria, according to the tender documents.
The development comes as Washington seeks to make greater use of Australia’s strategic location in the South Pacific amid China’s rapid military buildup. Analysts said the positioning of the stockpile reflects growing U.S. concern over the security of existing regional facilities and the need for more dispersed logistics networks.
The Marine Corps began globally prepositioning military supplies during the Cold War. Its existing model includes floating stores aboard ships and cave-based stockpiles in Norway containing weapons, ammunition and vehicles intended to sustain thousands of troops.
The first Marine Corps land stockpile in the Asia-Pacific is expected to open this year in the Philippines, close to potential flashpoints in the South China Sea. The planned Australian site would be larger and farther from many likely missile threats.
Australia does not allow foreign military bases on its territory, a politically sensitive issue in a country that maintains a security alliance with the United States while hosting an expanding range of American forces on rotation at Australian defense facilities.
The U.S. Navy is seeking a global defense contractor to employ about 110 engineers, mechanics, material specialists and safety specialists to manage the Australian stockpile, which the documents say includes “crew-served weapons.”
“Marine Corps activities in Australia support integrated global sustainment by maintaining ready-for-issue equipment and supplies for operations and exercises across the Indo-Pacific,” a U.S. Marine Corps Forces Pacific spokesperson told AFP.
The spokesperson declined to discuss contract details or force-planning assumptions but said Marine equipment is maintained at “high readiness.” The spokesperson said contracting arrangements and facility operations would be coordinated closely with Australia’s Department of Defence.
“These activities improve responsiveness, strengthen interoperability with allies and partners, and support a range of missions across the Indo-Pacific,” the spokesperson said.
The Marine Corps stockpile at Bandiana was approved last July and is separate from U.S. Army equipment arrangements in Australia. U.S. Army trucks were left at the Bandiana base in 2023 after a biennial Australian war game involving American troops.
“Marine Corps and Army equipment programmes are designed to support their respective service requirements and are managed under separate authorities and processes,” the Marines spokesperson said.
The Pentagon has asked Congress for $500 million next year to improve prepositioning of equipment and fuel across the Asia-Pacific as part of its effort to deter China.
About 2,000 U.S. Marines already conduct exercises for six months each year in Darwin, on Australia’s northern coast. The planned stockpile would place additional U.S. military equipment on the opposite side of the country.
A report from the Lowy Institute think tank this week warned that China has the capability to strike northern Australia with ballistic missiles deployed from its South China Sea outposts. Sam Roggeveen, the institute’s director of international security, told AFP that vulnerability was likely a “relevant consideration” in choosing southeastern Australia for the stockpile.
“Once these facilities are operational, they would be obvious targets for China,” Roggeveen said.
He said the expanding U.S. military presence in Australia represents “a major change to Australian policy that ties Australia much more closely to America’s strategic objectives in the region.”
John Blaxland, a professor of international security at Australian National University, said Australia’s geography is receiving renewed attention because of concerns about the vulnerability of the U.S. military base on Guam.
“With competition for influence in the Indo-Pacific having reached the highest level in over a generation, it is not surprising that the US Marines might look to Australia to enable such storage,” Blaxland said.
He said Australia may view additional U.S. investment as a practical way to strengthen regional defense without dramatically increasing its own military spending.
“Barring a massive increase in Australian defence expenditure, for which there is little political appetite, facilitating greater US investment in Australian real estate is widely considered to be the most prudent approach to take,” Blaxland said.
Australia’s Department of Defence told AFP that its strategy includes maintaining “southern base infrastructure focused on force generation, sustainment, health networks and logistics nodes” to allow the military to project power from the country’s north.
The planned Marine Corps stockpile underscores the growing importance of logistics, weapons storage and regional basing access as the United States and its allies prepare for potential contingencies across the Indo-Pacific.
Original article
Comments