By Gloria Ogbonna
A newly drafted report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reportedly raised serious concerns about the status of Iran’s nuclear program, warning that inspectors are currently unable to determine the location, composition, or condition of the country’s stockpile of enriched uranium.
According to multiple international news organizations that reviewed the document ahead of its official release, the United Nations nuclear watchdog is urging Tehran to immediately grant inspectors access to key nuclear facilities. The agency reportedly argues that without such access it cannot fulfill its obligations under international nuclear safeguards agreements or verify whether Iran is complying with its commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
The findings are expected to intensify global scrutiny of Iran’s nuclear activities at a time of heightened tensions between Tehran and Western governments.
The IAEA serves as the primary international body responsible for monitoring nuclear programs in countries that are parties to the NPT. Its mission includes ensuring that nuclear technology and materials are used exclusively for peaceful purposes and are not diverted toward weapons development.
For years, however, Iran’s relationship with the agency has been marked by disputes over inspections, transparency, and access to sensitive nuclear facilities. International observers have repeatedly expressed concern over Iran’s uranium enrichment activities, particularly because some enrichment levels reported in previous years exceeded what is generally required for civilian energy production.
The latest concerns center on Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium and the IAEA’s inability to independently verify its current status.
According to reports from Reuters, the Associated Press, and Agence France-Presse (AFP), all of which said they obtained copies of the draft report, the agency stated that it has lost continuity of knowledge regarding nuclear materials previously declared by Iran.
As a result, inspectors reportedly cannot determine the exact size of Iran’s uranium stockpile, where the material is currently located, what condition it is in, or whether enrichment-related activities have been suspended.
The report reportedly states that the agency “cannot provide any information on the current size, composition or whereabouts of the stockpile of enriched uranium in Iran or whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities.”
The inability to account for the material is considered particularly significant because of the strategic importance of enriched uranium within nuclear programs. International inspectors generally rely on continuous monitoring systems, site visits, and verification procedures to ensure that such materials remain accounted for and are not diverted to unauthorized purposes.
According to the draft document, obtaining updated information on Iran’s nuclear inventory has become a matter of “utmost urgency.”
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi reportedly emphasized that inspectors cannot properly carry out their responsibilities unless Iran restores access to the facilities in question.
The report states that Grossi informed Iranian authorities that implementation of the country’s safeguards obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty remains mandatory and cannot be suspended under any circumstances.
“The Director General has emphasized to Iran that it is indispensable and urgent to implement effectively the NPT Safeguards Agreement,” the report reportedly says.
The concerns outlined in the document come amid ongoing uncertainty following military strikes conducted against several Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025.
Those operations targeted major enrichment sites located at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—facilities that have long been at the center of international concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear activities.
The strikes were carried out after previous IAEA findings prompted renewed international criticism of Iran’s compliance with nuclear obligations. At the time, the agency adopted a resolution formally condemning Iran for violations of international nuclear safeguards, marking the first such action in roughly two decades.
The damage caused by the strikes and the subsequent disruption of monitoring activities have contributed to the current challenges facing inspectors.
Without direct access to affected sites, the IAEA says it cannot verify what happened to nuclear materials that were previously under monitoring or determine whether any stockpiles were relocated.
The latest report also highlights a longstanding dispute between Tehran and the agency regarding inspections.
A previous IAEA assessment issued before the military operations similarly concluded that inspectors lacked sufficient access to several declared enrichment facilities.
According to that report, Iranian authorities repeatedly declined requests for inspections and delayed responses to agency inquiries.
The agency noted that throughout the reporting period, inspectors were denied access to multiple enrichment facilities, leaving critical questions unanswered regarding operational status and nuclear inventory.
One facility specifically referenced in earlier findings was an enrichment plant that inspectors had been unable to visit for more than eight months.
Iranian officials reportedly attributed their refusal to permit inspections to what they described as extraordinary security conditions resulting from military actions and foreign pressure.
The earlier report documented repeated exchanges in which Iranian authorities stated that requests for inspections were being reviewed but ultimately argued that existing circumstances made compliance difficult.
By early February, according to agency records, Iranian officials had reportedly informed the IAEA that continued implementation of certain inspection requirements had become “untenable.”
The newest report also notes that Grossi continues to support diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing tensions and restoring cooperation between Iran and the international community.
The agency chief reportedly expressed support for ongoing negotiations between Tehran and Washington and emphasized the importance of dialogue in resolving disputes over nuclear oversight.
Meanwhile, Iranian officials remain actively engaged with international partners ahead of the upcoming IAEA Board of Governors meeting.
According to Iran’s state-run Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), senior Iranian representatives recently met with Grossi alongside officials from Russia and China to discuss issues expected to be addressed during the gathering.
The Board of Governors meeting is expected to focus heavily on the future of Iran’s nuclear program, the status of inspections, and the broader relationship between Tehran and the IAEA.
Grossi is expected to present a comprehensive update to member states regarding the agency’s findings, concerns, and recommendations.
The meeting comes at a pivotal moment for the international nuclear watchdog, as Grossi has increasingly advocated for stronger global responses to unresolved nuclear disputes and broader international crises.
In recent remarks, he argued that the United Nations must play a more active role in addressing major conflicts and security challenges around the world.
“The U.N. is absent from the management or resolution” of many of today’s major crises, Grossi said, calling for greater international engagement and more decisive action.
As diplomats prepare for next week’s discussions, the reported findings are likely to intensify debate over Iran’s nuclear activities and raise fresh questions about transparency, verification, and the future of international oversight efforts.
With inspectors still unable to verify the status of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, the issue is expected to remain a major focus of global security discussions in the weeks ahead.
Source Breitbart
Original article
Comments