The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly considering a change that would allow immigration officials to reject certain late-filed asylum applications without first conducting interviews.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing a policy that would allow federal immigration officials to more quickly deny some asylum applications when migrants fail to meet the legal filing deadline.

The proposal, described in internal federal documents reported by CBS News, would apply to certain applicants who file for asylum more than one year after arriving in the United States. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, would be able to reject those applications without first scheduling a standard asylum interview.

Federal immigration law already generally bars asylum claims filed more than one year after an applicant enters the country. The law includes exceptions, including for applicants who can show serious medical issues, ineffective legal counsel or other qualifying circumstances. Unaccompanied minors are also not subject to the one-year deadline.

Under the reported plan, USCIS officials would still be able to move a case forward and schedule an interview if they determine an applicant may qualify for one of those exceptions. The change would primarily affect cases in which officials conclude from the application materials that the applicant missed the deadline and does not qualify for an exception.

The proposal would mark a shift from USCIS’s longstanding practice of interviewing nearly all asylum applicants before deciding their claims, according to the report.

The reported policy is part of the administration’s broader immigration enforcement agenda, which has sought to tighten asylum processing and reduce the number of claims that move through the full interview and review process.

If implemented, the regulation could give asylum officers a faster route to deny applications that appear to violate the one-year filing rule, while preserving review for applicants who present evidence that they meet a legal exception.

Original article