There’s a level of hypocrisy in American politics that’s no longer subtle—it’s bold, it’s obvious, and frankly, it’s insulting to the intelligence of the American people. Democrats will require identification to enter their own high-profile events, including Democratic National Convention functions, where security checkpoints, credentials, and verification are strictly enforced. You don’t get through those doors without proving who you are. No ID? No entry. It’s that simple. Yet somehow, those very same politicians turn around and tell the American people that requiring ID to vote in an election—the very foundation of our republic—is “oppressive.”
Let’s be clear about what this really means. If ID is necessary to protect politicians, donors, and party insiders at their events, then why is it suddenly controversial when it comes to protecting the integrity of our elections? Why is security common sense in one setting but labeled discrimination in another? Americans use ID every single day. You need it to board a plane, open a bank account, pick up prescriptions, drive a car, and even enter certain buildings. But when it comes to voting, we’re told that asking for identification is somehow too much to ask.
This isn’t about protecting voters—it’s about controlling outcomes. Because if Democrats truly believed voter ID laws were unfair, they wouldn’t enforce identification requirements in their own spaces. The truth is, they understand exactly how important verification is when it affects them personally. They understand the need for order, accountability, and security. What they don’t want is that same level of accountability applied to elections where the stakes are power.
And let’s talk about the American people for a moment. The idea that requiring ID to vote is inherently racist or suppressive is not only false—it’s offensive. It assumes that certain groups of Americans are incapable of obtaining identification, which is not only untrue but deeply patronizing. Millions of Americans across every race, background, and income level manage to secure identification because it’s part of functioning in modern society. The real issue isn’t access—it’s political narrative.
What we’re witnessing is a double standard that continues to erode trust in our electoral system. When rules change depending on who benefits, people start asking questions—and they should. Election integrity should not be a partisan issue. It should be a baseline expectation. If you need ID to enter a political event, you should need ID to participate in choosing the leaders of this country. Anything less doesn’t strengthen democracy—it weakens it.
At the end of the day, Americans are not asking for anything unreasonable. They are asking for consistency. They are asking for fairness. And most importantly, they are asking for a system they can trust. Because when one set of rules applies to the powerful and another applies to the people, that’s not democracy—that’s hypocrisy on full display.
Read Lucretia’s book:
Still Standing: Faith, Conviction, and Beginning Again at 51
https://lucretia87.gumroad.com
Original article
Comments