BY Rosemary

Access to numerous foreign websites was blocked on mobile devices across central Moscow on Friday, as sweeping connectivity restrictions continued to affect Russia’s capital for more than a week, disrupting daily routines for millions of residents and delivering a heavy blow to businesses that depend on mobile data services.

Russian officials have maintained that the measures are necessary to safeguard the city against potential Ukrainian drone attacks, describing the limitations as part of broader security precautions. However, technology analysts and industry observers have increasingly suggested that the disruptions may also reflect preparations for a scenario in which authorities decide to further limit Russians’ access to the global internet.

The intermittent outages — previously recorded in dozens of regions across Russia over recent months — have led some residents of the capital to resort to older communication devices that had largely fallen out of use. Sales of walkie-talkies, pagers, portable radios and basic media players have reportedly surged as citizens seek alternative ways to stay connected and informed.

The shutdowns form part of a broader, multi-layered effort by the authorities to tighten control over the digital sphere. Over the past several years, the government has enacted restrictive legislation targeting online content and blocked access to platforms that fail to comply with domestic regulations. At the same time, officials have expanded technological capabilities aimed at monitoring and managing internet traffic flows.

Following the decision by President Vladimir Putin to send troops into Ukraine in February 2022, regulators moved to block major social media platforms, including Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. More recently, the state communications watchdog announced steps to restrict popular messaging services such as WhatsApp and Telegram.

At the same time, authorities have actively promoted a domestically developed messaging platform known as MAX, presented by officials as a secure national alternative but viewed by critics as a potential surveillance instrument designed to consolidate state oversight of communications.

Reports indicate that mobile internet disruptions in Moscow first appeared on the outskirts of the city in early March before spreading into central districts during the week. Connectivity blackouts have also been recorded in multiple other regions since late spring, suggesting a coordinated approach to implementing the restrictions.

During earlier outages, certain state-approved websites and digital services were placed on so-called “white lists,” allowing limited access despite broader connectivity issues. Yet in the most recent wave of disruptions, even some government portals, major banking services and widely used taxi applications ceased functioning when mobile networks were curtailed.

Businesses equipped with fixed broadband connections and households with wired internet access have largely avoided the impact. In contrast, cafés, restaurants and small retail shops that rely heavily on mobile payment systems have reported steep revenue losses as customers struggled to complete transactions. Cash machines and parking meters dependent on mobile connectivity also stopped operating, adding to the inconvenience for residents and visitors alike.

Taxi services have adapted by encouraging customers to request rides via traditional telephone calls and settle fares in cash. In certain instances, mobile coverage for voice calls was also temporarily suspended, intensifying communication difficulties across the city.

Earlier in the week, lawmakers in the lower chamber of Russia’s parliament — located within walking distance of Red Square — reported that mobile internet access was almost entirely unavailable within the parliamentary complex, underscoring the breadth of the disruptions.

While domestic websites and selected mobile applications remained accessible in central Moscow on Friday, the continued blocking of foreign online resources prompted speculation among observers that authorities were effectively conducting trial runs for a more comprehensive isolation of the country’s digital infrastructure.

Economic estimates of the shutdowns’ impact vary widely. The business newspaper Kommersant calculated that companies in Moscow may have lost between 3 billion and 5 billion rubles in just five days, equivalent to tens of millions of dollars. Other analysts believe the true financial toll could be significantly higher when accounting for lost productivity, interrupted services and declines in consumer spending.

Government officials have acknowledged the economic strain while defending the necessity of the measures. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated earlier in the week that the restrictions were being implemented in strict accordance with existing law and would remain in place for as long as enhanced security precautions were deemed necessary.

Recently enacted legislation obliges internet service providers to suspend mobile data services whenever authorities declare such action essential for public safety. Responding to questions about the timing of the Moscow outages, Peskov argued that increasingly sophisticated attacks by Ukrainian forces required correspondingly advanced countermeasures to protect civilians.

He added that the government was considering mechanisms to compensate businesses affected by the disruptions, although no specific plans or timelines have yet been announced. As connectivity restrictions persist, residents and business owners across Moscow continue to navigate an uncertain digital landscape shaped by security concerns, technological controls and mounting economic pressure.

Original article