BY EMMANUEL OGBONNA

South Korea’s National Assembly on Thursday approved legislation designed to implement a massive $350 billion investment commitment in the United States, a move intended to preserve favorable trade terms with Washington and shield South Korean exports from the most severe tariffs threatened by President Donald Trump’s administration.

The bill, which passed overwhelmingly by a vote of 226 to 8, authorizes the creation of a government-backed corporation that will oversee and manage the investment program. The entity will evaluate potential projects and coordinate closely with both South Korean and U.S. trade authorities as Seoul begins directing funds into key sectors of the American economy.

The legislation formalizes a pledge made last year by the South Korean government during negotiations with Washington, when Seoul sought to prevent the United States from imposing sweeping tariffs on its exports. Officials in the South Korean administration had urged lawmakers to approve the measure quickly, warning that delays could further unsettle an economy heavily dependent on international trade and already facing mounting uncertainty from global tensions.

Concerns have intensified as President Trump’s increasingly protectionist trade policies continue to reshape the international economic landscape. South Korean policymakers have been particularly worried about the potential consequences of tariffs targeting key industries such as automobiles, electronics and pharmaceuticals—sectors that form the backbone of the country’s export-driven growth.

The urgency surrounding the legislation increased further on Thursday when the Trump administration announced a new investigation into manufacturing practices in several foreign countries, including China as well as close U.S. allies South Korea and Japan. American officials indicated that the inquiry could lead to additional import taxes if the investigation concludes that foreign governments or companies have engaged in trade practices deemed unfair or harmful to U.S. industries.

The move signals that the White House is prepared to escalate its aggressive trade agenda as it seeks new revenue sources after a recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a broad set of tariffs previously imposed by Trump under emergency powers. Administration officials have suggested that new tariffs could replace the revenue lost from the court decision while continuing to pressure foreign governments to invest in American manufacturing and supply chains.

China reacted swiftly to the latest developments, criticizing the prospect of new unilateral tariffs and urging Washington to resolve trade disputes through negotiations. Speaking in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said tariff confrontations were damaging to the global economy and called on the United States to pursue dialogue rather than confrontation.

“China opposes any form of unilateral tariff measures,” Guo said, adding that tariff wars and trade wars ultimately harm all parties involved.

In Seoul, the newly approved legislation establishes the legal framework needed to carry out the investment commitments negotiated with Washington last year. Under the agreement finalized in November, South Korea pledged to direct $200 billion toward investments in American semiconductor manufacturing and other high-technology industries. Another $150 billion is slated for projects in the U.S. shipbuilding sector.

The arrangement was reached after months of tense negotiations between the two governments and followed a breakthrough summit held in October between President Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung. As part of the deal, the United States agreed to reduce reciprocal tariffs on South Korean goods from 25 percent to 15 percent, easing pressure on exporters while still maintaining a level of protection for American industries.

The agreement also includes safeguards intended to protect South Korea’s financial stability. Annual investments under the program will be capped at $20 billion, a measure designed to prevent excessive strain on the country’s foreign currency reserves while ensuring the long-term sustainability of the initiative.

Despite the overwhelming vote in favor of the legislation, the proposal faced criticism from several lawmakers who argued that South Korea was conceding too much to Washington’s economic demands. Some members of the opposition warned that the plan could expose the country to financial risks while giving the United States significant influence over how the funds are deployed.

Among the critics was Son Sol of the minor Progressive Party, who voiced strong opposition ahead of the vote. She argued that the bill effectively positions South Korea as a financial backer for American industrial policy while offering limited oversight from the National Assembly.

“We cannot be the money machine Trump wants us to be,” Son said, contending that the legislation does not grant lawmakers sufficient authority to review or block investments that might conflict with South Korea’s national interests or harm domestic industries.

Other lawmakers expressed concern that the rapidly shifting geopolitical environment could complicate the investment program. The conflict involving Iran, which has unsettled global energy markets and heightened security tensions in the Middle East, has raised fears that South Korea’s trade-dependent economy could face additional shocks. The country relies heavily on imported energy supplies, leaving it vulnerable to disruptions in oil and gas markets.

For many policymakers in Seoul, these developments underscore the need to maintain stable relations with the United States, South Korea’s most important security ally and one of its largest trading partners. Supporters of the legislation argued that approving the investment framework quickly was essential to preventing further economic friction with Washington.

The delay in passing the bill had already drawn criticism from the White House. In January, Trump warned that the United States could reinstate tariffs of up to 25 percent on South Korean exports—including automobiles and pharmaceuticals—if the agreement was not implemented promptly.

Those threats increased pressure on South Korean opposition lawmakers who had previously resisted the measure. Government officials warned that failure to follow through on the investment pledge could trigger severe trade consequences that would ripple through South Korea’s manufacturing sector.

By approving the legislation, South Korea’s National Assembly has cleared the way for the government to begin implementing one of the largest foreign investment commitments ever made by the country. The newly established corporation tasked with managing the program is expected to begin reviewing potential projects in coordination with U.S. counterparts in the coming months.

While the vote resolves an immediate political dispute in Seoul, broader uncertainties remain. The Trump administration’s evolving tariff strategy, combined with global geopolitical tensions, continues to cast a shadow over international trade. For South Korea, whose economic prosperity relies heavily on global supply chains and export markets, the challenge will be navigating these pressures while maintaining stability at home and preserving access to its most critical trading partners.

Original article