By Gloria Ogbonna
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Thursday that negotiators had reached an “understanding” on most elements of a potential agreement with the United States during the latest round of talks in Geneva. However, no major breakthroughs were formally announced, and significant gaps appear to remain between the two sides.
The discussions marked the third round of negotiations overall and the second held in Geneva. All sessions have been mediated by Badr al-Busaidi, the foreign minister of Oman, which has long played a quiet diplomatic role between Washington and Tehran.
Araghchi described Thursday’s meeting as the “most intense so far,” noting that it ran several hours longer than previous sessions. Speaking to Iranian state media, he emphasized progress but acknowledged unresolved issues.
“There is agreement on most elements,” Araghchi said. “Some technical aspects need to be discussed later.” He added pointedly, “The U.S. must choose either the path of dialogue or the path of confrontation and tension.”
Key U.S. Demands Still Unresolved
Despite the optimistic tone from Tehran, Iran does not appear to have made major concessions on core U.S. demands. According to reports, Iranian negotiators rejected proposals that would require Tehran to:
- Transfer its near-weapons-grade uranium stockpiles to a neutral third country
- Halt further uranium enrichment activities
- Dismantle or demolish certain nuclear facilities
- Curtail aspects of its ballistic missile development program
These issues have been central to U.S. concerns, particularly as Western governments warn that Iran’s uranium enrichment levels are edging closer to weapons-grade thresholds.
While at least one unnamed U.S. official described Thursday’s talks as “positive,” other sources reportedly expressed frustration at what they characterized as Iran’s continued resistance to meaningful concessions.
Oman Signals “Significant Progress”
Oman’s foreign minister, Badr al-Busaidi, maintained an upbeat posture following the talks, saying “significant progress” had been made. He announced that technical-level discussions are scheduled to continue next week in Vienna, a city long associated with nuclear diplomacy involving Iran.
Busaidi was also scheduled to travel to Washington for meetings with senior U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, in what Omani officials described as an effort to prevent escalation and avoid war.
Vance: Diplomacy Preferred, But Military Option Remains
Speaking to reporters Thursday, Vice President Vance reiterated his preference for diplomacy while making clear that military options remain on the table if necessary.
“I remain skeptical of foreign military interventions, and we all prefer the diplomatic solution,” Vance said. However, he suggested that a limited, targeted military strike against Iran could potentially be carried out without triggering a broader regional war.
“The idea that we’re going to be in a Middle Eastern war for years with no end in sight — there is no chance that will happen,” he stated.
Vance emphasized that the next move depends on Tehran. “It really depends on what the Iranians do and what they say,” he said—directly countering Araghchi’s assertion that the “ball” is in America’s court.
U.S. Military Posture Raises Stakes
Even as negotiations continue, the U.S. has significantly increased its military presence in the region. The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest and most advanced carrier in the world, departed from the Greek island of Crete on Thursday and could arrive off the Israeli coast within 24 hours. Its deployment adds substantial firepower and strategic leverage.
Meanwhile, the carrier strike group centered around the USS Abraham Lincoln is already operating within range of Iran, alongside advanced U.S. warplanes stationed at regional bases.
The simultaneous pursuit of diplomacy and heightened military readiness underscores the delicate balance at play. While public statements emphasize progress and dialogue, the movement of U.S. naval assets signals that Washington is prepared for multiple contingencies.
A Fragile Diplomatic Moment
For now, both sides are claiming momentum while quietly preparing for potential escalation. Iran insists the United States must decide between negotiation and confrontation. U.S. officials argue that Iran must demonstrate seriousness by addressing core concerns over enrichment and weapons capability.
With technical talks set to continue in Vienna and high-level diplomatic engagement ongoing, the coming weeks may determine whether this latest round of negotiations leads to a revived framework—or deeper instability in an already volatile region.
Source Breitbart
Original article
Comments