BY EMMANUEL OGBONNA
The United States and Iran returned to indirect negotiations Thursday in the Swiss city of Geneva, seeking to revive diplomacy over Tehran’s nuclear program while a significant American military buildup across the Middle East underscored the fragile security environment surrounding the talks.
The renewed discussions come amid heightened regional tension and deep mistrust between the two adversaries. U.S. President Donald Trump has pressed for a comprehensive agreement that would sharply restrict Iran’s nuclear activities, arguing that the current moment presents a strategic opening as Iran grapples with economic strain and political dissent following waves of nationwide protests. Tehran, for its part, has signaled interest in averting another military confrontation but insists it will not relinquish what it considers its sovereign right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.
Iranian officials have also rejected U.S. demands to expand negotiations beyond nuclear issues to include Tehran’s long-range missile program and its backing of regional armed groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Washington maintains that these elements are inseparable from broader regional stability.
The stakes are considerable. Iranian leaders have warned that any U.S. strike would prompt retaliation against American military installations across the region, placing tens of thousands of U.S. service members at risk. Tehran has also threatened to target Israel, raising fears that a localized escalation could spiral into a broader regional conflict.
“There would be no victory for anybody — it would be a devastating war,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an interview with India Today filmed shortly before his departure for Geneva. He cautioned that because American bases are dispersed throughout the Middle East, any confrontation could quickly engulf multiple countries. “It is a very terrible scenario,” he said.
Thursday’s meeting marked the third round of negotiations since last year’s brief but intense conflict between Israel and Iran. That confrontation, a 12-day war in June, saw Israel launch strikes against Iranian targets, followed by heavy U.S. bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities. While much of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was reportedly damaged, the full scope of the destruction remains unclear.
The U.S. delegation is being led by Steve Witkoff, a longtime Trump associate serving as a special Middle East envoy, joined by Jared Kushner. Iran is represented by Araghchi. The talks are once again being mediated by Oman, which has historically acted as a quiet intermediary between Tehran and Western capitals.
After roughly three hours of negotiations, the delegations adjourned, with diplomatic convoys later seen returning to the Omani diplomatic residence, suggesting discussions would continue. Oman’s foreign minister, Badr al-Busaidi, described the exchanges as constructive.
“We’ve been exchanging creative and positive ideas in Geneva today,” al-Busaidi said. “We hope to make more progress.”
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, characterized the talks as “very intensive,” adding that Iranian officials met not only with the Omani mediator but also with the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations body responsible for monitoring nuclear compliance. He said Tehran saw “constructive proposals” regarding both nuclear constraints and sanctions relief.
Trump has called for Iran to halt uranium enrichment entirely and to roll back its missile capabilities and regional alliances. Iran maintains its nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes and says negotiations must focus solely on nuclear matters.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters Wednesday that while Iran is not currently enriching uranium, American officials believe Tehran continues efforts to rebuild aspects of its program following last year’s strikes. “They’re always trying to rebuild elements,” Rubio said, adding that Iran appears to be positioning itself to regain nuclear capability if it chooses.
Tehran has stated it has not enriched uranium since June but has restricted access for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency to sites damaged in U.S. airstrikes. Satellite imagery has shown renewed activity at some of those facilities, suggesting Iran may be assessing damage or attempting to recover materials.
Western governments and the IAEA have long asserted that Iran maintained a covert weapons program until 2003. After Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear accord during his previous term, Iran steadily increased enrichment levels, reaching 60% purity — a short technical step from the 90% threshold typically associated with weapons-grade uranium.
U.S. intelligence agencies currently assess that Iran has not restarted a formal nuclear weapons program but has taken steps that would shorten the timeline for producing a nuclear device should its leadership decide to do so. Some Iranian officials have publicly discussed the country’s technical readiness, though no official decision to pursue a weapon has been announced.
Beyond the negotiating table, military positioning has intensified. Satellite images captured earlier this week appeared to show that U.S. naval vessels normally docked in Bahrain — home to the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet — were deployed at sea. During last year’s hostilities, the fleet adopted similar dispersal tactics to reduce vulnerability to missile or drone attacks. The U.S. military’s Central Command declined to comment on the current deployments.
Regional markets are closely monitoring developments. Oil prices have climbed in recent days amid fears that any disruption in the Persian Gulf could affect global energy supplies. Iran previously signaled it could restrict traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s traded oil passes.
Diplomats and analysts caution that while continued engagement suggests neither side is eager to abandon talks, a breakthrough remains uncertain. Much depends on whether the two governments can reconcile fundamentally different expectations: Washington seeking sweeping concessions and Tehran demanding recognition of its nuclear rights and relief from crippling economic sanctions.
For now, diplomacy and deterrence are unfolding in parallel — negotiations inside Geneva’s diplomatic compounds, and a visible display of military readiness across the Middle East — with the outcome likely to shape the region’s security landscape for years to come.
Original article


Comments