By Anietie anii-bassey
Senate Democrats voted Thursday to block a sweeping funding package that includes money for the Department of Homeland Security and several other federal agencies, intensifying a high-stakes confrontation with Republicans and the White House over immigration policy just hours before a potential partial government shutdown.
The procedural vote failed 45–55, reflecting Democrats’ determination to withhold support unless the Trump administration agrees to new limits on its stepped-up immigration enforcement campaign. Federal funding is set to expire at midnight Friday, raising the prospect that portions of the government could close if lawmakers cannot reach a compromise.
President Donald Trump sought to strike a conciliatory tone before the vote, telling reporters that his administration was in active discussions with Democrats and stressing that he wanted to avoid a shutdown.
He said negotiators were considering a temporary arrangement that would separate Homeland Security funding from the rest of the spending bill and extend it for a short period, allowing talks to continue while keeping most agencies operating.
“We don’t want a shutdown,” Trump said, declining to offer details about the negotiations.
Democrats, however, hardened their stance following the deaths of two protesters in Minneapolis during an encounter with federal agents, an episode that has reverberated through Capitol Hill and reshaped the debate over immigration enforcement.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the moment demanded action, arguing that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency must be fundamentally reformed before his party would supply the votes Republicans need.
“The American people support law enforcement. They support border security,” Schumer said. “They do not support ICE terrorizing our streets and killing American citizens.”
Schumer has urged Republicans to carve Homeland Security funding out of the larger package, which also finances the Defense Department and other agencies through the end of September.
Under the proposal under discussion, those other departments would receive full-year funding, while Homeland Security would get only a short-term extension to give negotiators time to resolve the dispute over enforcement practices.
The confrontation echoes a shutdown fight just two months ago, when Democrats blocked another spending bill over expiring federal health-care subsidies, ultimately triggering a 43-day closure before a group of moderates brokered a deal with Republicans.
This time, party leaders insist their caucus is more unified, galvanized by the Minneapolis deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.
Republicans say they remain hopeful an agreement can be reached. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota told colleagues that talks were narrowing the gap. “We’re getting closer,” he said on the Senate floor.
Inside the Democratic caucus, lawmakers described near-total agreement on what they want from the administration. Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith said after a closed-door meeting that members shared a “unanimity and shared purpose.”
“When you boil it all down, what we are talking about is that these ICE agents should be following the same rules that your local police department does,” Smith said. “There has to be accountability.”
Democrats are demanding that immigration officers remove face coverings, wear visible identification, use body cameras and obtain warrants for arrests. They also want an enforceable code of conduct and tighter coordination with local law enforcement, along with an end to what Schumer described as “roving patrols” in cities.
Earlier Thursday, Tom Homan, the administration’s point person on border policy, said at a news conference in Minneapolis that federal authorities were exploring plans to reduce the number of agents operating in the state, depending on cooperation from local officials. Whether that gesture will satisfy Democrats remains uncertain.
Significant obstacles remain. Some Democrats question whether even a short-term extension of Homeland Security funding is acceptable. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who aligns with the party, has said Congress should not approve any additional money for ICE unless Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is removed.
Across the Capitol, House Republicans have drawn a firm line. In a letter to Trump earlier this week, the conservative Freedom Caucus warned that the funding bill would not return to the House without money for Homeland Security intact, signaling resistance to any Senate-driven revisions.
Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the Republican chair of the Appropriations Committee, urged Democrats to advance the legislation so negotiations could continue ahead of final passage. “This morning’s vote is about taking the first step, not the final step,” she said shortly before the tally.
Even among Republicans, there is some openness to splitting the package and delaying Homeland Security funding for further debate. But support for the Democrats’ specific demands on ICE is far from universal.
North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said he could accept separating the bills but objected to requiring agents to show their faces, arguing that doing so could expose them and their families to threats. He nonetheless criticized leadership at the department, saying recent decisions were damaging the agency’s reputation.
South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham signaled that he would counter any Democratic changes by pushing for provisions that bar local governments from resisting the administration’s immigration policies, escalating the policy fight further.
Democrats insist they are prepared to hold their ground, even if it means forcing a shutdown.
“It is truly a moral moment,” said Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal. “I think we need to take a stand.”
With hours left before funding expires, negotiators continued to shuttle between offices, weighing whether a temporary truce is possible or whether Washington is headed toward another disruptive lapse in government operations.
Original article
Comments