By Blessing Nweke
The Trump administration moved quickly to address the mass shooting at Brown University that left two people dead and nine others wounded, but its public response was marred by inaccuracies that added to confusion during a moment of national anxiety.
Late Saturday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that the alleged shooter was in custody, saying he had been briefed and that the FBI was on the scene. Less than 20 minutes later, Trump reversed course, acknowledging that no suspect was in custody. The initial claim echoed a premature statement from Brown University officials that was later corrected.
The episode is the latest in a series of emergency situations during Trump’s second term in which senior administration officials released information that later proved false or misleading, according to an NBC News analysis. Similar reversals followed the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., and now the Brown attack.
On Sunday, FBI Director Kash Patel posted that a “person of interest” had been detained in a Rhode Island hotel based on a local police lead. About 12 hours later, that individual was released, with Providence police disputing Patel’s account of how the tip originated. Despite the confusion, the White House said Monday night that Trump maintains “full faith and confidence” in his law enforcement team.
The pattern extends beyond the Brown case. After the Washington, D.C., shooting last month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem briefly deleted and reposted a message, while Attorney General Pam Bondi incorrectly identified the victims as members of the D.C. National Guard, rather than the West Virginia National Guard. One of the victims later died.
Noem also inaccurately described the accused attacker, Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, as “unvetted,” despite reporting that he underwent extensive screening before being granted asylum earlier this year.
Critics say such missteps underscore how rapidly evolving crime scenes can lead to misinformation — but also raise questions about the administration’s communication discipline. Trump has defended Patel and others, arguing that identifying suspects is inherently difficult and that officials have acted swiftly under pressure.
Original article
Comments