BY EMMANUEL OGBONNA
Hong Kong officials said Monday that their investigation into the city’s deadliest residential blaze in decades has uncovered troubling evidence that some of the protective netting used around the Wang Fuk Court apartment complex did not meet fire-safety requirements. The findings come as the city faces a rare surge of public emotion in the form of donations, vigils and community support—matched by increasingly forceful government actions aimed at controlling criticism and online discussion.
The inferno, which erupted Wednesday and took firefighters until Friday to fully extinguish, began on the lower levels of one of the eight high-rise buildings in the Tai Po complex. The fire spread rapidly after netting wrapped around bamboo scaffolding ignited, allowing flames to climb the structure before bursting through foam window panels that caught fire and shattered from heat. Strong winds then pushed the flames laterally across the complex, where the same scaffolding and netting covered each block. Within a short span, seven of the buildings were burning.
Authorities initially believed the netting complied with safety rules based on early samples, but Chief Secretary Eric Chan said a broader round of testing told a different story. Investigators collected 20 samples from various elevations and discovered that seven failed to meet required standards. Chan suggested that contractors had knowingly cut corners on materials in order to increase profits, a finding already fueling public outrage.
“They just wanted to make money at the expense of people’s lives,” Chan said at a press briefing, reflecting rare openly accusatory language from a senior official.
The death toll rose again on Monday as search teams recovered eight more bodies, including three that firefighters had previously located but could not safely retrieve. Dozens of residents remain unaccounted for, though authorities believe many may be among the 39 bodies not yet formally identified due to the condition of the remains. The Hong Kong police Disaster Victim Identification Unit has managed to search five of the seven burned buildings but has only partially entered the remaining two, which suffered the heaviest structural damage. Teams said it will take considerable time before they can complete the full sweep of all affected blocks.
The Wang Fuk Court complex housed roughly 4,600 residents, and the depth of the tragedy has triggered an unusual wave of public solidarity. Donations for survivors reached 900 million Hong Kong dollars (about US$115 million) by Monday. Outside the charred buildings, long rows of flowers, handwritten notes and small offerings have appeared, forming a growing memorial that residents visit throughout the day.
“When something happens, we come out to help each other,” said local resident Loretta Loh, who visited the site to pay her respects. “I have a heavy heart.”
Authorities acknowledged the enormous needs facing displaced families. Nearly 700 residents have been placed in hotels or hostels, while more than 1,100 have moved into transitional housing. The government has released emergency cash subsidies for daily expenses, including costs related to funerals, and pledged to help survivors rebuild their homes with a combination of private donations and 300 million Hong Kong dollars in government funds. Two temporary shelters continue to operate for those who have not yet found longer-term accommodation.
New details also emerged about longstanding complaints regarding the safety of the scaffolding and netting. The Labor Department confirmed that residents had raised concerns for nearly a year and that inspectors had visited the site 16 times since mid-2024. Officials said contractors had received repeated written warnings that they were failing to meet fire-safety requirements, including one delivered just a week before the disaster.
In the aftermath, the city’s anti-corruption agency and police have made 14 arrests, including company directors and an engineering consultant connected to the renovation works. But increasing numbers of residents and observers are questioning whether accountability should extend beyond contractors to include government regulators who had routinely inspected the site.
“People are angry and think that the Hong Kong government should be accountable,” said Jean-Pierre Cabestan, a political scientist based in the city and a senior research fellow at the Asia Centre in Paris.
The government’s response to public criticism has been swift and forceful. Officials have repeatedly warned residents not to circulate what they describe as misinformation, with Security Secretary Chris Tang dismissing rumors about firefighter tactics and claims that survivors were being charged exorbitant hotel fees. Tang said those spreading such claims would face arrest.
His warning came as police detained three people over the weekend in connection with online posts and petitions that demanded greater government accountability. According to local media reports, one detainee helped organize an online petition, while another was a volunteer assisting displaced residents in Tai Po. The Office for Safeguarding National Security accused unnamed individuals of attempting to exploit the disaster to “create trouble and disrupt Hong Kong,” though it offered no specifics.
Cabestan said the authorities were now responding to public expression in a manner more characteristic of mainland China’s political climate, acting preemptively to prevent gatherings or organized criticism.
Tang would not comment in detail on the arrests but said police “must take action” against anyone believed to be “endangering national security,” adding that some individuals were attempting to “incite hatred against the government” at a time of collective sorrow.
Public dissent in Hong Kong has been sharply limited since the mass protests of 2019. Large demonstrations are now almost entirely banned, and opposition political figures have been barred from running in elections. The fire at Wang Fuk Court has become not only a humanitarian tragedy but a flashpoint for questions about governance, accountability, and the narrowing space for public expression in the city.
Original article


Comments