Jordan Peterson discusses the importance of taking responsibility for one's problems and finding solutions to them, in order to grow and contribute to the world.
Jordan Peterson is a Canadian media personality, clinical psychologist, author, and professor emeritus at the University of Toronto. He began to receive widespread attention as a public intellectual in the late 2010s.
I am a video editor who's passionate about creating educational and motivational videos with the purpose of helping people overcome their biggest obstacles in life.
We own commercial licenses for all the content used in this video except parts about the topic that have been used under fair use and it was fully edited by us. For any concerns, business inquiries, etc. please contact us via email in the “About” section of the channel.
Do you have problems in your life that you're not addressing that you could solve and the answer is yes
And it's an easy thing to figure out you sit on your bed one morning and say okay
There's some things that need to be done that I don't want to do that
I could do that would make things better by the end of the day
What are they well your your conscience will deliver those in no time flat man, and then you might have to say okay?
well, how do I entice myself into doing a few of those and
And if you ask instead of trying to force yourself to do it like you're a tyrant and a slave at the same time
You can usually negotiate with yourself so that you'll start to sort those things out
Sort them out put your house in order and then move out move on
So it's important because the thing is you have a practice domain
Right there are there are things that are within your grasp that you could fix
Fix them and you'll learn
You'll learn because it's harder than it looks
Fix them and you'll learn how to fix things and then something else will beckon as another problem that you could fix
You know you all have your problems. What does that mean like there's an infinite number of problems in the world
Some of them happen to be yours. Why is that I don't know exactly, but you have your problems great
solve them you know one of the thing I learned as a therapist every therapist has to learn this is
Because one of the things you wonder when you're first starting to be a clinician is how do you not take the
Catastrophes of your clients home with you and the answer to that is because it's immoral to
They're not your problems
They're their problems like they're they're their life. You know your problems are your life
You don't want to solve someone else's problems for them because you take away the the deep meaning
That's to be found in having them work through the problems on their own, and then you steal the credit
Well, I can help you with that. It's like well
Yeah, maybe but I don't help you with the next problem then
So in any case you sort sort out the problems that are right in front of you
And you will it will make you grow very very rapidly and then you'll be able to sort out more complex problems without making them
worse
But the solution to a very complex problem is you should be better
Person than you are because then you'd be better at solving complex problems and lots of them are coming your way
So bloody well get your act together
And and that's what I've been telling people and but more than that because it's more than that because that's
merely
Burdening people with excess responsibility. Let's say so that can be a crushing message
You're not who you could be you know get your bloody act together
You're whining away in the corner, and you're no good to yourself and anyone else. You know it's harsh
but then there's a
Nunder there's another element to that which is there's way more to you than you think you are and that you have something
Necessary and vital to contribute to the world and if you don't contribute it that things will happen that aren't good
And that's terrible for you and everyone else so it's not only that you that you need to do this because it's your responsibility
But you you need to understand that there isn't anything better that you could do for yourself or for anyone else and people are
Dying to hear that message
Yeah, well, it's so amazing like it's I'm in this very weird situation right now to say the least
Well if you try and you fail that could be in a micro endeavor or a macro endeavor if you try and you fail
Well you have two options while you've three one is you can just ignore it and sometimes
That's the right thing to do because if you tried again, it would work, and so that's the utility of persistence
But you do and you never know in some fundamental sense whether you're being persistent or blind
That's a tough thing to figure out
most entrepreneurs who become successful have failed in a dozen enterprises before and so are they
Persistent or have they failed to learn from experience like well. There's a toss-up then
Then for imagine you don't ignore it okay now. You're gonna. You're gonna fix the problem
Well then you have two choices you could fix the world or you could fix yourself and
Let's say while fixing yourself is often at least in principle easier than fixing the world although
Sometimes the world is wrong, and you're right not very often, but sometimes you know so if you're gonna fix yourself
You've failed multiple times the first thing that has to happen is that the part of you that's error ridden has to die
And so there is that element. That's exactly I would say in some sense the payoff of neuroticism is well
Why have negative emotion it's well
You get anxious so that you stop doing things that might cause your own destruction
Like there's there's value in the signal
But because it's so difficult to determine like if you're arguing with your wife
this is constant issue in marriages is like well should she change or you and
The answer sometimes is she should and sometimes the answer is you should and sometimes the answer is you both should
But it's not like that's easy to figure out a priori
One of the things I tried to do with my clients all the time was to I wouldn't say minimize a problem
But it would be to parameterize it
You know like maybe I'd have a client who was so afraid of their economic uncertainty that they wouldn't even tell me how much rent
They were paid because I had clients like that and so I would
Continue to inquire till I got them to admit the terrible truth about their rent
And then we could narrow the problem
We could keep narrowing the scope of the problem
so they didn't feel like the problem meant their entire financial future was going to fall apart and and it's that and
There's a catalyzation in that right that narrowing where that's actually beneficial
imagine that you have a problem and then imagine that you want a solution and
Imagine that there there's a particular solution to that particular problem
But then imagine that you have what you might describe as a bigger problem, and that's not the problem
It's the fact that you have problems because that's the real problem
The real problem is the fact that you have problems, and then you might say well
You don't want a solution to our problem. You want a solution to the fact that you have problems
And so it's a leap of abstraction
So then you might say well is there way of conceptualizing the set of all problems
That's universal, and I think there is that's what religious stories try to do and and they do it using drama
dramatic means because
The the problem is so complex, so that's the meta problem
It's so complex that we don't really know how to formulate it. That's what we're struggling towards
So it's like well. What's the problem of life something like that well you could say that the problem of life
And I outlined this quite carefully in in 12 rules for life
The the problem of life is this
we're finite and
Mortal that's problem number one so so the first problem is that life is essentially tragic. It's
little us against
infinity and we lose and
Not only do we lose
But we lose in a manner that produces a substantial amount of suffering and sometimes an unbearable amount
So it's a big problem, so that's problem number one
Problem number two is that that's not the worst problem the worst problem. Is that that's true plus
malevolence exists in the world evil exists in the world and makes that first problem even worse than it would have to be and
That's universally true for everyone all the time. That's archetypal so when you when you formulate a situation archetypally
You you speak about it in a manner. That's eternally true, so
There's lots of ways that you and I differ
but there's many ways that we're the same and
so that would be what constitutes our essential humanity, let's say and what constitutes what makes us the same is that
like you
I'm mortal and my life is finite and my existence is characterized by suffering
And I have to contend with the fact of malevolence in the world, and it's it's the the terribly destructive
Character
character of the natural world it's the tyrannical element of the social world and it's the
adversarial element of
Myself and every other individual so that's that's the malevolent element and so we're stuck with that okay fine
That's the archetypal formulation of the problem. You could say that's the mythic landscape right and something like
Good and evil in a world of chaos and order. It's something like that. It's very interesting
You know there are games online that have that as their basic structure right the game developers have figured this out
So that's pretty interesting okay, so then the question is well
how do you comport yourself in a landscape of chaos and order and
When the game is good versus evil something like that well
then that's where the idea of the archetypal hero emerges and the archetypal hero is the person whose eyes are open and
whose speech is true and
Who faces both the chaos of the unknown and the tyranny of the known and
Balances them right and then you think well, and that's that's the antidote to the problem
That's the meta solution to the meta problem that which you most need is to be found where you least want to look
That's right, it's that's right. It's the theme of the Holy Grail. That's exactly right well
So there's a there's a little story that goes along with that so
King Arthur and his knights are all sitting around a round table which implies that they're of equal stature essentially
And they go off to look for the Holy Grail which is the container of that which redeems
It's something like that, but of course who the hell knows where to look for the Holy Grail
So each of the knights decides to enter the forest at the point that looks darkest to him
Right and that's that's a hell of a story because first of all it shows that courage is the first
Requirement right because you look for what's darkest and you go in there
that's that's part of you know Jung developed that idea quite substantially with regards to his notion of the shadow and
it's also I think it's also what makes this believable for people because you know the alternative is something like well, you know
Look for happiness and everyone thinks well
I'd rather be happy than miserable and like fair enough, you know
But there's nothing about that that has any nobility and it's not believable
No one believes that because everyone knows that life is bounded by tragedy and that malevolence abounds
Everyone knows that so and you say, you know
So there's that terrible those that terrible dark dyad of tragedy and evil and you wave the little flag of happiness in front of it
It's like, you know, no one believes that that will work. But then when you tell people look
You're dark. You're a monster. You really are and but that's actually useful because you cannot
Survive the world without being a monster people think oh, well, that's interesting
I kind of suspected that I was a monster and everyone's always said that was bad
It is bad, obviously
but there's something that can be done about it and that's something that week that can be transmuted into something good without being
Inhibited to be good. I can be a monster, but I can be like a civilized monsters like yeah
That's what you should aim at you should be
Unbelievably dangerous the more dangerous you are the better and then you should control that