Calcium supplementation for osteoporosis has long been a topic of debate among healthcare professionals and patients alike. In this video, Dr. Doug Lucas aims to address the controversy surrounding calcium supplementation, explore alternative sources of calcium, and share my new perspective on its role in osteoporosis management.
Masterclass details: Hosted by Doug Lucas, DO, Board Certified Orthopedic Surgeon and Anti-Aging Specialist, you'll gain insight into the lifestyle, nutrition, testing, and medical solutions for Osteoporosis management and yes, possibly, even reversal.
I would be grateful if you could consider sharing your thoughts by leaving a review once you've had a chance to read it. Your feedback can inspire others on their own path to bone health excellence. You can leave a review here: https://www.amazon.com/product-reviews/B0CGPB77TY
=======================
This channel is focused on Bones, Hormones, and Healthspan to help midlife women and beyond aim for optimal, not average, and reignite their spark!
The videos on this channel will be focused around helping women navigate healthspan and longevity through the lens of osteoporosis, perimenopause, and menopause. When it comes to osteoporosis and menopause providers and educators often get tunnel vision and your symptoms might get better, but if you don't keep longevity in mind, symptom improvement may come at the expense of heart and brain health.
Subscribe and follow along as Dr. Doug Lucas explores the research and clinical applications surrounding women's health.
ABOUT DR. DOUG LUCAS ======================== Dr. Doug Lucas: Owner/founder of Optimal Bone Health and Optimal Human Health. My team and I work together to create custom bone optimization plans for individuals based around supplements, hormone optimization, peptides and more in order to increase bone health and longevity!
Watch and Enjoy! Dr. Doug Lucas Key Moments in this Episode ========================= Chapters
00:00 Introduction 2:20 Fear around Calcium Supplementation 2:35 Study 1 5:51 Study 2 8:52 Study 3 11:15 Masterclass Registration Link 11:48 Study 4 12:18 Study 5 13:34 Study 6 15:21 Study 7 17:09 Study 7 19:48 Algae based calcium background 22:36 Study 9 24:43 Study 10 28:06 Study 11 29:10 How has this changed our practice? 30:20 Money back guarantee details 32:13 Final Point- Contamination 33:10 Study 12 33:25 Closing Summary 33:38 Bonus Details
welcome back to the Dr Doug show your
resource for bone health hormone
optimization and Women's Health span
through midlife and Beyond so there is a
lot of controversy around calcium and
osteoporosis and calcium for
osteoporosis the challenge here is do we
need a supplement do we not need the
supplement if so what supplement is it
okay if I get calcium through food what
about vitamin D what about vitamin k
What form how
much lots of questions the truth is is
that the concern is around the risk of
heart attack and stroke so this is a
high-risk game and I often get some
feedback from people saying oh it's just
a supplement oh it's not a big deal but
it is a big deal because heart attacks
and strokes are a big deal and so we've
paid a lot of attention to the detail of
studies around calcium uh different
formulations and I want to be very clear
about this video that if you've watched
my previous videos on calcium
supplementation um my position has
changed a little bit so I've talked to a
number of experts I've talked to um some
uh industry leaders in the supplement
space uh read dozens and dozens of
studies so I'm here to present my new
position on calcium supplementation and
this is a shift It's A New Perspective I
want to go through all of it so this is
going to be relatively long so I
apologize for that but I want you to
understand why we're recommending what
we're recommending um the changes I'm
making based off of the lit lat that
I've reviewed in the past um and how I'm
looking at those through a different
light with the information that I have
now so stick around I want to also uh
announce that we're going to talk about
a partnership at the end of this and uh
be some discounts for you that are
listening and making it through this
video so definitely stick around to the
end and if you haven't already
subscribed to this Channel please do so
so we can help more people to learn more
about bone health I'll see you in a
minute three 2 1 here we
go
all right so why all this fear around
calcium supplementation I mean the
recommendations for calcium go back for
decades so why is it that all of a
sudden now we're worried about heart
attack and stroke with calcium isn't
calcium just natural
well the thing is around 2010 there was
a study that came out by an author uh by
the name of Boland and uh Boland
released two big studies but the first
one from 2010 was a metaanalysis that
reviewed 15 randomized control trials so
15 reasonably well-designed studies that
looked at calcium supplementation
greater than 500 milligrams which is
what most people are taking but without
vitamin D and that's a really important
point in this metaanalysis what they
found is that there is a 5.5 % chance of
having a heart attack myocardial
infarction cardiovascular event in the
placebo group and
5.8% in the calcium supplement group so
when you do the math on that and you do
the statistics you come out with what's
called a hazard ratio of about
1.31 which means that you can say that
there is a 31% increased uh risk of
heart attack with calcium substitutes so
just as a reminder absolute risk versus
relative risk so we talk about
statistics a lot of times drug companies
um and anytime you want to make a big
impression you will use the relative
risk because if you uh especially if you
have low numbers the relative risk is
going to look significantly bigger
versus the absolute risk so you go back
and and we know the numbers 5.5 and 5.8
it was actually a
0.3% uh difference between the two
groups right so the absolute risk was
3/10 of a per the question we have to
ask oursel with absolute risk is is it
clinically relevant because 30% sounds
clinically relevant and when you look at
the numbers um in this case in this meta
analysis it included over 8,000
participants there were 143 heart
attacks in the calcium group and 111 in
the placebo group so that is 32 more
heart attacks so is that clinically
relevant yeah I mean for me it is so
that seems like it's relevant that's a a
large number for me and yes that's
concerning now some other interesting
statistics here is that stroke and death
uh overall death did not not reach
significance and that these studies were
using Rock and synthetic forms of
calcium so calcium carbonate and calcium
citrate rather than more natural forms
or whole food forms and there was not
vitamin D included in the formulation
which we now know you know two two
decades later we now know that vitamin D
is is critical for the absorption and
utilization of calcium Not only was it
not utilized in the rcts the randomized
control trials but it also wasn't
measured was likely a deficient
population we can't control for the the
population deficiency uh because we
don't know what it was so regardless of
those weaknesses in that study this was
a big shock to a lot of people a lot of
patients a lot of doctors and then the
recommendations didn't really change and
so what has happened in the past and
what still happens now is doctors say
well you need 1,200 milligrams of
calcium if you're postmenopausal or up
to, 1500 milligrams depending on the the
recommendation so I'm going to give you,
15500 Mig of uh supplementation that way
we don't have to worry about it through
food because doctors in general don't
talk about food and in America
especially we kind of have this feeling
that more is better and the challenge
here is is more better does that really
apply and so Bolan didn't stop there he
actually went further and did another
study another uh kind of a metaanalysis
it's kind of an interesting design here
but the second study is another 2011
study the one was 2010 but this is a
2011 study looking at the women's health
initiative data now for those that have
heard me talk about this let me just let
me just mention it quickly so the the
Women's Health Initiative was a again a
massive trial started in the late 1990s
and it is what blew up with the hormone
optimization and replacement practices
in the early 2000s and it has had uh
massive waves uh tsunami sized waves of
impact on women's and hormone sense but
some of the things that they also did
during the Women's Health Initiative
include a calcium and vitamin D study so
36,000 of those women and the Women's
Health Initiative
also did a prospective study on uh
calcium and vitamin D that was
controlled so there was a placebo group
and they used 1,000 milligrams of again
a rock calcium calcium carbonate and 400
IU of vitamin D so that's not a lot of
vitamin D the original publication in
2006 did not show an increased risk of
uh cardiovascular events with calcium
and vitamin D but as usual the devils in
the details so I've actually reviewed
that study and my takeaway was hey
vitamin D added to the calcium even if
it's a rock form of calcium reduce the
risk but Bolan took a look at this a
different way and Bolan said well look
if you look at the details of the study
and he actually got additional data that
I didn't have access to so I Adit I
don't know if I would have picked up on
this or not but when you look at the
details of the study and you look at the
number of people that were reporting
already being on calcium 46% of those
participants of those 36,000 people were
already taking calcium and over half of
them were already taking vitamin D and
they were allowed to continue their own
supplements despite what they had been
recommended or what they had been given
as part of the study so they may have
already been on calcium and vitamin D
and then given a placebo and you can
imagine that is going to negatively
impact your outcome right so now we
don't know uh What uh the results are
actually showing so Boland took those
data he excluded those people and did a
subgroup analysis now you have to be
careful with subgroup analysis because
this always exposes potential bias but I
think at this one it's legitimate
because you're looking at the group that
didn't have calcium and and vitamin D
already on board and probably didn't
continue to take it we don't really know
and then he looked at some other studies
some two more recent randomized control
trials that used uh calcium carbonate
and vitamin D so I actually looked those
studies up and he must be really good at
getting data that's not published
because neither of those studies uh
actually reported on heart attack and
stroke or death in their publication so
he must have been able to get some data
that that I didn't have access to
because I couldn't find those data but
when he did the subgroup analysis of the
Women's Health Initiative he did see an
increase in heart attack so does that
nail the coffin on calcium and vitamin D
should we just put this one to bed and
not use it I don't think so we're not
going to get away with that that easily
so the following Year in 2012 Dr Heeney
who's who was unfortunately he's he's
passed but Dr Heeney was a brilliant
calcium researcher so did a lot of
research on calcium and he looked at
these studies and he applied what's
called called The Bradford Hills
criteria uh and these are specifically
for this a statistical way to look at
data and really looked at these and said
look these are not well done studies
there is no control for the risk factors
associated with heart attack there's no
real physiological mechanism that makes
sense here and there's no reason that we
should change our recommendations in
other words don't listen to the outcome
of these studies we have better studies
to talk about uh we don't need to change
our recommendations and so that was
published in 2012 um but here's the
physiological consideration that I hear
all the time so what he said is there's
no like there's no way that this makes
sense like why would calcium consumption
increase the risk of heart attack how
would it do that but here's what I hear
people say well I took a calcium
supplement and now I have calcification
in my arteries kateed coronary either
way and they assume that the calcium
supplementation is the cause but what we
have to remember is that
calcification of the arteries is a
process that's been going on use quotes
here for those that aren't watching this
but naturally in quotes um forever as as
long as we know as long as we've been
able to do studies on arteries we know
that they do get calcified that is with
or without calcium supplementation so we
don't necessarily need to stop our
calcium supplementation if we start to
see calcium in the arteries however we
do know that plaque development calcium
developing in the arteries is
potentially something that could lead to
um worsening disease it could lead to
heart attack and stroke that gets into
the whole area area around uh stable
versus unstable plaque and heart disease
and Etc and we don't need to go there
but just know that calcification of the
arteries is not necessarily causal from
calcium supplementation they can exist
they can coexist they could be unrelated
there's a lot of ways to look at that so
I hope that makes sense that we don't
there isn't really a good explanation of
why this would happen other than if
there is excess calcium in the blood and
you'll see why this is important later
but if there is excess calcium in the
blood because of one reason or another
not enough vitamin D not enough vitamin
K uh inappropriate form whatever could
the calcium be going to the arteries it
could uh but we again we don't really
see strong evidence that that's the case
but there is definitely more to this
story before we get to that if you
haven't been to our master classes on
osteoporosis or women's hormone
optimization take a look in the
description on YouTube uh or if you are
listening to this in a podcast go to Dr
douglas.com and you can find those free
resources these master classes we run
about every two weeks on those two
topics it's basically how we put it
together for people for our patients uh
and an opportunity for you to ask
questions again totally free all right
so what does the newer data say about um
about calcium about vitamin D since 2012
what's happened well in 2015 this is our
fourth study in 2015 there's a meta
analysis again of randomized control
Trials of 63,000 postmenopausal women
pretty big there are studies looking at
just calcium or calcium vitam D together
and there was no effect of calcium or
calcium and vitamin D on heart attack uh
or stroke so that's good except that
there still was a trend that existed for
calcium alone so you still you kind of
get this subtle signal right that maybe
something's going on and then in 2016
this study called Mesa Mesa stands for
multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
now this is something that U this is a
great study there's a lot you can take
away from this but one of the things
they did in this study was they looked
at coronary artery calcium scores so
these are the CT scan that looks at the
heart looks for calcium in the coronary
arteries the arteries that give bleed
blood for the heart and it followed
people for 10 years and so it showed
that after 10 years that there was a
slight increase in Risk if you were on a
calcium supplement and they didn't
divide out calcium and calcium and D
together that I'm aware of but they also
found in this cuz they were looking at
at food intake they also found that
calcium from food was actually
protective against developing coronary
calcification so that's interesting they
even went so far as to divide calcium
intake into quintiles so five different
groups the highest quintile of
consumption had the lowest incidence of
subsequent coronary artery calcium
formation isn't that interesting so
there must be something or there may be
something a better way to say that about
the form of calcium are you getting it
from food versus are you getting it from
supplementation so so then there's
another study more recent from 2021
because this was a review study and it
looked at calcium and vitamin D studies
and again uh sort of went through all
the details of the analysis and said
look there's no reason to be concerned
there is a subtle signal but if you need
it you need it and we shouldn't change
what we're doing so overall what's the
takeaway here the takeaway is that
calcium alone does show a very small
signal for increasing um heart attack
but that does doesn't mean that we
shouldn't use it that means we need to
understand more about it and so there's
some interesting data I want to review
with you my remaining questions then are
are there differences in the different
forms of calcium and should we be
restricting or promoting whole food
sources of calcium or just getting
calcium all through diet so let me dig
into what I've recommended previously so
I have some older videos they're still
on if you want to watch them uh they
just have a a card that leads to this
video because I want people to get the
most updated version um but previously I
was recommending calcium in the form of
MCHC or microcrystalline hydroxyapatite
complex also sometimes called oine
hydroxyapatite complex or ohc basically
what this is is ohc MCHC is calcium in
the form of um hydroxyapatite complex
which is the basically the formulation
that you see calcium in Bones so it is
essentially Ground Up Bones now one of
the cool things that you can do when you
are grinding Up Bones is if you preserve
the protein matrix you can actually get
some anabolic protein effects from the
The Matrix itself so there is a product
an ohc product that is unfortunately not
available in the US but actually has
several studies behind it so natural
sources of ohc um have been shown in
this study seven that we have here is a
a 2021 um observational cohort showing
that ohc is far superior to to calcium
carbonate again the rock form of calcium
um and prevented bone loss and that's
cool it's a key Point here is that it
prevented bone loss it didn't improve
bone mineral density but it it prevented
uh bone loss um and I think the deal is
again it's a whole food source it's your
body knows what to do with it um and
those additional proteins are going to
have an impact um on bone metabolism and
it's not a rock so it's better um but
like I said all of those ohc studies are
on a product that is not available in
the US so if you look this up you can
look it up online you can see it called
osteopor OST Osan uh Osteo genon um a
couple other different names there and
there is a similar product that is
available in the US called stimukal now
in the past I've recommended products
from gerro uh orthomolecular has an MCHC
product as well um and the gerro
products in particular use stimukal now
why did I recommend this in the past I I
recommended stimukal because it has a
similar formation it is in the
hydroxyapetite form it contains
micronutrients it contains collagen um
it is similar in formulation to the ohc
but if you look at the studies on it
there are no good human studies there
are no bmd or fracture reduction studies
so we're making a leap and assuming that
the MCH is going to work the same way as
the ohc if it comes uh in the form that
it was coming in in stimukal now
stimukal does have some studies and I
bring this one up so this is study eight
I bring this one up because this
actually is really important to
demonstrate the difference between rock
salt versus Whole Food forms of calcium
and blood and so if you look at this
graph uh this is a graph from the study
itself and what they did is they
compared uh styal to again calcium
carbonate and calcium citrate and you
can see that there's three lines there
the lower line is the um the calcium in
blood levels with the uh stimukal which
is the MCHC product versus the other two
which are much higher and that probably
why we're not overloading the tissues
with calcium with a whole food source as
we are with a Rock Source or a synthetic
Source uh through um calcium citrate so
um I think that's great and that helps
us to be confident about using certain
types of calcium over others however we
don't have data to say that this product
will specifically improve bone mineral
density slow bone loss reduce fracture
risk Etc uh they also had some
interesting studies that showed that uh
there was an impact on growth factors
and cyto kindes with this product versus
others so again stimukal better than
Rock calcium better than synthetic
calcium but is it the best now when I
was doing my initial research on um
MCHC um I had looked at and actually
previously used the algae Cal products
so algae based calcium and I I went away
from it for reasons that I'll talk about
in a minute but I came back to it
recently because I did a talk for uh
osteostrong um and Al Cal and Osteo
strong have a relationship and so I was
doing this supplement talk with um with
osteostrong for their members and there
was um uh a representative from alal was
there and so we uh you know just
politely talked about the differences
and and um calcium and we agreed on
basically everything but it was a little
bit uncomfortable because I had
previously said I am going to recommend
using this MCHC product over an algae
form and so after we got done with the
talk we actually hopped on another Zoom
call we were chatting about you know
kind of my my process and how I got
there and I got to sit down with the CEO
of alal uh because I I told him that
when I reviewed the studies I had there
were some things that I couldn't make
sense of uh and I couldn't get the
answers so I just went with the product
that I could get the answers that I was
looking for so I actually went through
those concerns with him and it was
really really helpful and it's changed
my mind about how I view the algae uh
form of calcium that they use and the
products that alial sells so I'm going
to go through sort of uh these studies
they have some great studies on their we
website uh uh that are specifically on
alal so I'm going to go through these
and um I'm going to show you what I
initially saw um and then what I learned
about the study that has helped me to
change my recommendation on um calcium
products all right so before we get into
the this first study let me just give
you a little bit of background about
algae based calcium so algae is a whole
food source of calcium it is going to be
better tolerated than Dairy for a lot of
people now you guys know that I'm I'm a
fan of dairy but we know that many
people don't tolerate Dairy they don't
tolerate the lactose or the Quine or
whatever and the challenge I have is
that I tell people and I see a lot of
other people on the internet YouTube Etc
telling people get your calcium through
through food and I agree with that we
should get our calcium through food but
if you don't tolerate Dairy it's not
that easy and getting a calcium through
a supplement that also gives you the
other minerals that you also need um is
going to provide you with some value
likely now what's interesting about the
um the mchd products is that the the
ground up bone yeah it did have calcium
in it uh but it didn't have some of the
other things that I was always adding so
it's basically creating like a
multi-mineral out of multiple products
um algae is naturally A multi-mineral
and vitamin product the algae and I
apologize if I get this wrong if I say
this wrong but lithothamnium Super
positum Algae um that's the first time
I've ever said that it's 93% mineral and
7% organic material so it is most mostly
a multi-mineral product and it's about
30% calcium about 2 to 4% magnesium and
the rest are just trace minerals so it's
kind of cool that it is this natural
multi mineral in this very specific
ratio that includes calcium so I sat
down with the nules from alicen and he
gave me a breakdown of the research um
sort of the pathway that they went to
develop the product and it's really
interesting what it takes to create a
company like that and so one of the
first things they did was to look at the
the upper limit recommendations of
calcium they were trying to decide how
much is enough you know people are
getting 12250 milligrams of calcium
carbonate is that too much is that
enough should it be more should it be
less the upper limit recommendations of
calcium in both the US and Europe are
around 2400 milligrams from all sources
so that includes food now interestingly
this is not why they did this but the
dose that they came up with from a
calcium perspective of alic Cal happens
to include 2400 milligrams of minerals
of that 720 Mig of that is calcium again
it's a whole food form of calcium so
when they were going through the process
of figuring out what to do with this
calcium one of the other things that
they did was to compare the algae form
of calcium to calcium citrate and
carbonate in bench studies so in vitro
and they were looking at what it does to
the cells what it does to the Bone and
it increased alkalin phosphatase which
is a bone uh turnover marker and it uh
increased calcium deposition but
decreased oxidative stress and so this
was kind of a cool finding that
warranted then human trials so there are
three studies that I'm going to talk
about this first one is our ninth study
for today and this is the alal um kind
of open label cohort study so they uh
this is not blinded it's not controlled
but they had 158 participants and they
used one of two different forms the 158
people uh used the first form and then
they switched to the second form
followed them each for 6 months and then
annualized the results and so you have
what they report in there is ma PC or
mean annualized percentage change both
of the products had strontium in it so
we'll have to keep that into
consideration we look at the results but
when you look at these results it is
significant that um there was when
compared to Baseline um about 0.5%
increase uh in group one and a
2.18% increase from group two now you'll
see in these studies that there's kind
of different formulations of the alal
product and they were kind of
manipulating the the recipe as they went
to try to find the biggest impact and
I'll show you in the next study the one
that is the biggest impact and while
that first one wasn't clinically
significant when you look at the
expected bone loss it becomes clinically
significant with about a little over 1%
and a little over um actually almost 3%
in group two so both statistically
significant at that point that's the
first time any calcium bone health
product has shown an improvement in bone
mineral density so that's a really good
finding but some of the weaknesses of
this study are that they didn't actually
follow these people for 12 months they
did an annualization after 6 months so
it's probably pretty accurate but it'd
be good to know what 12 months looks
like and also they reported on whole
body bone mineral density rather than
spine and hip and this just was uh this
was kind of a a failure in the
development of the protocol where they
didn't really recognize the importance
of spine and hip over a whole body uh
there's lots of studies showing that
whole body and Spine and hip are going
to be closely related U but again it
would be good to see spine and hip
specifically to know if there's going to
be an impact on one versus the other um
and then of course there's strontium in
both products so we can't say that it's
the algae by itself because there's also
strontium um in the product as well so
good thing we have more studies so the
second study um published in 2011 which
is our 10th study today um also had
three groups now this one's a little bit
different because this one had U three
groups three different formulations and
one of the formulations didn't include
strontium they also had some lifestyle
components that went along with this so
there's some um recommendations around
nutrition and exercise and they uh wore
a podometer so that's obviously going to
have an impact on their U activity level
and so there were three groups like I
said there were 125 in the first group
51 and then 35 uh so it got smaller as
it went on um and then this is where
things got confusing for me so if you
follow this study uh and you look at
this initial um group so if you look at
table one here you can see that there's
three groups um and then if you look at
fig fure two you can see how the groups
do what I couldn't make sense of is why
the group that had the least amount of
stuff in it so didn't have strum didn't
have vitamin D didn't have vitamin k um
and also didn't have the the Fitness and
Nutrition recommendations outperform the
other two I couldn't make any sense of
that this one of the things that I I sat
down and talked with Dean about um and
it turns out that there was actually an
error in the publication that they
couldn't get corrected and so um this is
one of those unfortunate things that
happened and research but it makes sense
so now if you flip that around and you
make group The what they have listed as
group three group one and then move the
other two over now it actually all makes
sense so what you see then is that the
group group one had the least amount of
stuff in it group three had the most
amount of stuff in it and uh the results
of the increase in vul density are um
linearly related to those uh increases
in different content so group or plan
one rather was 12 months of the alal
alone it's an older version so there's a
newer plan here um plan two had um plan
two and three had different versions
again with more things added to it um
and so you can see then in figure two
that plan a increased boneo density 1.3%
from Baseline uh Plan B 2% and plan C
4.1% from Baseline um now these were all
statistically significant from Baseline
alone and definitely when compared to
expected losses so these are really big
changes uh with just the supplementation
and again plan one didn't include
strontium or lifestyle Rex so I think we
can safely say that the the algae by
itself this multimineral calcium rich
product is going to have a positive
impact on bow and no density without
strontium and that that was really
important for me to make that
understanding because I couldn't make
sense of that before and so when you
look at at the the other plans as they
move forward so plan two then had the
algae Cal more D vitamin K2 was MK4 uh
and then plan three had even more
vitamin D more magnesium K2 is mk7
Vitamin C Boron and lifestyle and so you
can imagine how like that's going to
increase when you start adding each of
those things which we know make an
impact so now all of a sudden this all
makes sense um and so I can see then
that that there is a reason to
potentially use this over the MCHC
product the third thing that alal did is
to do a long-term follow-up so what they
did with this study was to take um 172
alal customers and they reached out to
say hey we see that you have a dexa scan
um on file we would love for you to get
a new dexa scan and some of these people
were seven years out so they got data on
out to seven years so 172 total people
data out to 7 years and what you can see
in this figure that there's pretty much
a 1% per year uh continual increase and
that is great the only downside of this
study I would say is that I'd love to
see the groups be larger uh and
obviously I think there's some bias
potentially in this because they are
long-term alal customers they're likely
committed they're probably doing other
things too but still it shows that you
can continue to improve bone over time
even up to seven years um the product
that these patients were using were also
included strum um so there's um again
some confounding variables there and I
would love to see that study done a
little bit differently um to continue to
see what potentially the algae by itself
could do but I know they could do that
because a lot of people want to see that
increase in bmd so how has that changed
our practice and the truth is is that
has changed our practice so again we
were recommending the you know the gero
products the orthomolecular products um
but having to put a lot of different
things together to get what we wanted
and one of the things we always struggle
with is capsule fatigue uh you know
recommending too many things trying to
get the things that we want for people's
bone and for health optimization in
general so this is a way for us to put
all these minerals in one place uh and
it helps us to pair down our capsules
but also to give people a product that
we know has human evidence that can
support increasing increasing bone
mineral density simply from the algae
itself so I think that's great we still
recommend people get their calcium from
food and for those that can consume
Dairy they don't necessarily need a
calcium product but knowing what that
that upper limit is it's probably not
going to harm them to have it on board
if it's coming from Whole Food likely
going to reduce the amount of calcium in
Blood and it's a good buffer that also
gives them the other minerals that go
along with it if people don't end up on
a calcium product for us we are putting
them on a multi-mineral because I feel
like those minerals are really important
all right so then when I sat down with
Dean one of the other things that I
wanted to ask him was hey you guys have
this money back guarantee tell me a
little bit more about how this works and
so I was surprised to see it because
when you again listen to most doctors
they will tell you just outright
osteoporosis is not reversible and yet
you have the supplement company that
says hey take our product and if you
don't see an improvement in your dexa in
six months we'll give you your money
back wow uh so I was surprised and I
wanted to figure out okay how often does
that happen and so what he told me is
that they have about 100,000 clients and
they've only refunded uh about six
people per year which is really really
low um so it just goes to show that the
the product is likely going to improve
your bone maneral density and also that
osteoporosis is reversible now I think
that um again there's bias in there
because those are people that are um you
know probably doing other things too I
don't think that the supplement alone is
probably going to do everything for
everybody it might be all some people
need U but that's why we created a
comprehensive program that I um that I
think most people are going to need to
get all of the lifestyle the rest of the
supplements through the lens of Health
span potentially hormone optimization a
and replacement so I think all of that
plays a role so I'm going to do another
video on what would now be my three
favorite supplements for osteoprosis but
I'll just give you a sneak peek in that
which is what we're basically doing now
is we're adding the um alal plus we're
also adding the vitamin D complete which
gives you a little bit more D vitamin A
E and K2 as both mk7 and
MK4 uh as well as a little bit of K1 so
it gives you a nice uh complex of the
fat Sol vitamins so I'll talk more about
that in another video I'll also talk
more about St team in another video too
cuz I know there's going to be a lot of
follow-up questions on that so uh
welcome to ask your questions but I'm
going to to do an updated video on
strontium uh because I'm sure they're
going to come out of that then my last
Point here is on um one of the questions
I get around algae which is what about
contamination aren't our oceans
contaminated and the answer is yes they
are contaminated um but I talked to Dean
about this and they do um they test
every batch the areas where the algae is
grown is very well protected um they're
testing everything and all of the um
levels are going to fall within all the
safety standards from the uh what is it
the US pharmacopia also the American
urbal Products Association so these
things are very very tightly regulated
another interesting thing he told me is
that the alic Cal powder itself is
certified organic now the product isn't
because some of the minerals can't be
made organically so algae Cal is uh the
capsules don't necessarily say it on the
bottle but the powder is and that's
really I think important um and then
additionally if you really wanted to
look this up there was a study this will
be our last study that I'll I'll point
out here study 12 is a study um that
alal also funded that looked at
toxicology studies and what it could
potentially do to the body so again
really really well studied product uh
more so than most supplements that's for
sure so congratulations on making it to
the end of this video um the fact you
got here tells me that you are very
committed to your health so kudos to you
for that um if you made it to the end of
this video you also get to hear about
our bonus so we are now partnering with
alic cal um from an optimal bone health
and optimal human health perspective to
be able to offer to our YouTube uh
subscribers and viewers a 10% discount
so if you want to look in the
description for the unique code to get
10% off of your first purchase uh from
alal you can take a look and do that and
again if you haven't subscribed please
do so helps us to reach more people who
are looking to improve their bone health
and that's all I have for you today so
friends remember you are created for
greatness so seek optimal not average
don't be afraid to be extraordinary
because you are and that's what it
takes uh a few uh other couple
announcements are really just one if
you've already done the master classes
the the bone health and the the health
I'm sorry hormone optimization master
class and you're looking for more the
next steps might be the health span
nation which is where you can ask me and
my team
uh questions through a weekly Zoom as
well as have access to our um content
Vault and our community our really cool
Community who are supporting each other
and helping each other to optimize their
health uh that's Health span Nation um
and then our bone foundation's course um
is our our free comprehensive course
it's like the master class blown out
into I don't know how many talks right
now 16 or or more um different talks in
a workbook to go along with it and again
that is totally free health span nation
is not more information on the Dr
douglas.com website or you can look for
the links in the YouTube video see you
next time this presentation is for
General informational purposes only does
not constitute the practice of medicine
nursing or other professional health
care services including the giving of
medical advice no Dr patient
relationship is formed the use of this
information and the materials linked to
this presentation are at the user's own
risk the content in this presentation is
not intended to be substitute for
professional medical advice diagnosis or
treatment users should not disregard or
delay obtaining medical advice for any
medical condition they have and they
should seek the assistance of their
Health Care Professionals for any such
conditions