Chicago police propose new rules for Flock, license plate readers

Fox - 32 Chicago
7 followers
Oct 26, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe Chicago Police Department (CPD) has released a draft policy regarding the use of Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR). The proposal introduces new oversight for third-party systems like Flock, including search requirements and restrictions on data sharing for immigration or reproductive health investigations, while the public is invited to provide feedback through November 12th.
All right, CPD is revising their policy on license plate readers.
This is a story that our Saquon has been following.
So let's get over to her live to see what we know so far.
Hey there, Sae.
Hey, guys.
Yeah, CPD just released their new draft policy on license plate readers
and now asking for the public to weigh in.
Now, guys, for the very first time, the department actually defines
and discusses external ALPR systems, which is very important.
That's been the whole focus of this investigation
because it refers to third-party networks like Flock
that the city does not technically own or operate.
So far, our investigation has found CPD ran over 23,000 Flock searches
in a three-month span through a third-party contract
operating without dedicated ordinances or oversight.
But under this newly released draft here,
officers accessing this sort of data would now
be required to enter a case number,
the reason, and an explanation before running a search.
It also shortens its internal data retention window
from 365 days down to 30 days,
although it does say in fine print that that would only apply
to city-owned systems, not external networks like Flock.
The proposed rules would also ban plate data from being shared
with out-of-state agencies for immigration enforcement
or reproductive health care investigations.
We asked CPD for records that show any rules, training, manuals,
data retention settings, and monthly search totals using Flock,
including written restrictions
on data sharing with immigration authorities.
CPD denied our request,
claiming redacting over 211,000 rows of data was unduly burdensome.
Now, we do plan to narrow our search here
and file another FOIA request asking for those similar records.
But in the meantime, we are still waiting
to hear directly from the mayor about this.
We heard from the mayor's office a few weeks ago.
They said that it's expected that he could talk about it sometime
this week, potentially even next week.
By the way, that public comment period is open right now
on CPD's website through November 12th.
Terrence Lauren.
