Kenya: Trial shows crucial role of religion in Shakahola massacre

FMM - F24 Video Clips
19 followers
Oct 21, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedA report on the conviction of Paul McKenzie in Kenya, who led followers to their deaths in Chakaoula Forest as part of a self-created \"Holy Land.\" The case has sparked a national debate over religious freedom, the lack of regulation for preachers, and whether the judiciary has the authority to determine biblical authenticity.
I visited Chakaoula Forest with the activist
who first revealed the scandal.
He showed me the different villages scattered throughout the forest.
Each of these villages was named after
a holy place such as Bethlehem or Jerusalem.
Paul McKenzie had created his own version of the Holy Land.
Then he showed me the mass graves where
the bodies were found after people were persuaded
and sometimes forced to let themselves die,
both children and adults.
Later, I met with Paul McKenzie's lawyer,
and he told me that Paul McKenzie was not responsible
of the deaths of all these people,
and that the verdict could have
far-reaching consequences for Kenya.
Who is responsible for a decision made
after preaching has been done to you?
And because we don't have regulation
of religion in this country,
Who determines what is the right scripture to preach?
I feel like the freedom of religion is under attack.
We do not have a guideline on who and how you should preach.
Because even to become a preacher,
you don't need to be qualified in terms of academics.
He said that MPs should decide whether the law needs changing
and whether certain sermons should be punishable.
But a year ago, he was saying that it was not up to a court.
Well, on Monday, the judge found Paul McKenzie
and his co-defendants guilty.
And one part of her verdict sparked controversy.
She said that the book of Maccabees,
which Paul McKenzie was using for his preachings,
was not part of the Bible
and that therefore the preachings were not biblical.
But many challenged this claim,
arguing that the book is recognized as a sacred scripture.
So the ruling could reignite a broader debate.
Can the court decide what is part of the Bible
and what can be said in a sermon?
Of course, in the upcoming days and weeks,
both religious leaders and politicians will
have their say.
Bastian, where are we there for us in Kenya?
