Jurors shown bloodstained carpet and surveillance video in Naresh Bhatt trial

Fox - 5 DC
27 followers
Oct 16, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedNew evidence was presented in the murder trial of Naresh Bhat, who is accused of killing his wife, Mamta, in 2024. The prosecution introduced surveillance footage of the defendant purchasing knives and physical evidence, including a blood-stained carpet and forensic findings from the family home, to link Bhat to the crime.
New evidence presented today in Naresh Bhat's murder trial.
He's the man accused of killing his wife, Mamta, back in 2024.
The jurors seeing a blood-stained carpet from the family's home
and videos from what prosecutors say was a key trip to Walmart.
Fox 5's Stephanie Ramirez live outside
the court with the very latest tonight, Steph.
And guys, closer to the end of trial today
is when we saw some of that surveillance video.
Take a look at this from Walmart showing the defendant, Naresh Bhat,
purchasing what investigators have hinted could
be a possible murder weapon.
Bhat purchasing three knives on July 30th of 2024.
It was a big day in court, literally, in other moments.
And that came when a large,
some 8-by-10-foot piece of carpet was brought into the courtroom,
rolled out by Prince William County Police Investigator Joseph Restino
with the help of prosecutors.
He told the court he cut this piece out of the defendant's bedroom.
And we couldn't really see it from the gallery.
But in court, evidence photos were shown of the suspected bloodstain
that Rustino says he found underneath
the carpet where forensics previously had a Blue Star hit.
The carpet brought in today
is the same Blue Star evidence we showed lit up yesterday,
actually, when the Blue Star agent detects possible traces of blood.
Rustino says back at their office,
he cut a sample to send to a lab for DNA testing
and that he also pre-swabbed it,
the swab showing in pink, meaning positive for blood.
Investigators also Blue-Starred
and photographed other parts of the home.
Now, we did blur out some of the reddish-brown stain in the photo.
In the master bath, Rustino told the jury he pulled out
the defendant's bathtub as part of evidence collection
and found a stain where the bottom of the tub would sit,
believing a large volume of blood seeped through the tub caulking.
The defense challenged some of this.
you have this positive reaction
but you can't know from the reaction how that substance ended up
where it ended up right no you don't know
when it got there i do not you don't know why it's there
i do not the thing about any scientific method is that even
though it has some limitations it
doesn't diminish its scientific value can BlueStar detect blood
that someone has attempted to
clean. Yes, BlueStar is,
that's one of the main uses for it at crime scenes is to locate blood
that's not visible to the naked eye.
Now guys, that last person you heard from there was brought
in as a BlueStar expert.
She testified that BlueStar does not confirm blood, but it is used
as a law enforcement tool.
The investigator we heard from earlier in the day, he testified that
he wouldn't expect to see that type of positive reaction
or as much of a positive reaction
in the defendant's bedroom, guys.
