SpaceX is executing a historic recovery of the S-40 Starship from the Indian Ocean following Flight 13. By retrieving the 50-meter vehicle, SpaceX aims to analyze re-entry durability and gather critical data to transition from ocean splashdowns to a fully reusable system where vehicles are caught directly at the launch tower.
I'm still following it, everyone. Our favorite floating starship, S-40, or as many fans are now
calling it Starboat, is somehow still refusing to sink. Days after Flight 13, it's still floating
in the Indian Ocean, and SpaceX appears to be preparing for the biggest rocket recovery
operation in the company's history. So what happens next? How exactly will SpaceX bring
home a 50-meter spacecraft floating hundreds of kilometers offshore? And why is this operation
attracting attention across the entire aerospace industry, including NASA? Let's find out on
today's episode of Great SpaceX. It's now been roughly a week since Flight 13, and incredibly,
that's also how long S-40 has remained afloat in the Indian Ocean. At this point, the spacecraft
has almost developed a personality of its own. Instead of exploding like previous starships,
it's simply drifting peacefully, almost as if it's patiently waiting for someone to come pick it up.
Fortunately for S-40, that's exactly what SpaceX plans to do. Over the past several days,
the company has continued monitoring the spacecraft while preparing what could become
the largest rocket recovery mission ever attempted. This isn't just another recovery
operation. It's a project that could last well over a month and span thousands of kilometers.
So if you haven't already, make sure you subscribe to Great SpaceX. We'll be following
every stage of this historic recovery, along with all the latest developments from SpaceX
and the wider aerospace industry. Now let's look at the newest updates.
As we discussed in our previous episode, both SpaceX and Elon Musk have officially confirmed
that S-40 will be recovered. The company even released photographs showing members of the
recovery team aboard a vessel operating close to the spacecraft. Since then, we've received
even more encouraging news. More than 140 hours after splashdown, nearly 6 full days,
S-40 was still floating. Even after drifting approximately 370 kilometers from its original
landing location, the spacecraft remained intact. At that point, it was still about
1,255 kilometers from Australia's western coastline. That's an impressive demonstration
of durability. Earlier, a vessel named Go Australis reached S-40's location. Its crew
photographed the spacecraft and began evaluating possible recovery options. However, it soon became
clear that one vessel alone wouldn't be enough to complete such a massive operation. Instead of
immediately beginning recovery, the mission shifted toward monitoring and assessment. Now,
additional support appears to be arriving. Two more vessels, Norman Ranger and Skimmer Tide,
have reportedly headed toward S-40's location. At the time of this recording, both ships were still
several hundred kilometers away. By the time you're watching this episode, they may already
be working alongside the recovery team. Interestingly, both ships are similar in
That detail tells us something important. Rather than lifting S-40 directly onto a
massive transport vessel immediately, SpaceX will most likely begin by towing it. That
approach makes perfect sense. Australia is relatively close compared with Texas.
Towing the spacecraft to shore requires smaller vessels while avoiding the need for enormous
lifting equipment during the first phase of recovery. Based on everything we've seen so far,
that now appears to be the most likely plan. S-40 will probably be towed back to Australia.
Once ashore, engineers can begin preliminary inspections while waiting for a much larger
transport vessel to arrive. That second ship will likely handle the much longer journey
back to Starbase. And that's where the strategy changes. Unlike the relatively short tow to
Australia, transporting S-40 from Australia to Texas is an entirely different challenge.
Whether SpaceX chooses the Pacific route or sails through the Indian and Atlantic oceans,
the voyage could easily take between six to eight weeks. That's far too long to leave the
spacecraft continuously exposed to seawater. Instead, the safest option would almost certainly
involve lifting S-40 completely out of the water. That dramatically reduces corrosion
while protecting valuable hardware during the transoceanic journey. In other words,
tow first, transport second. It's a two-stage recovery plan. And honestly,
it's probably the most practical solution available.
Of course, recovering a spacecraft of this size is anything but simple. Sometimes people
imagine recovery as little more than attaching a rope and slowly pulling the vehicle back to shore.
If only it were that easy. Remember, Starship stands roughly 50 meters tall. It measures
9 meters in diameter. Its dry mass alone approaches 100 tons. And after splashdown,
residual propellant may still remain on board. That's arguably the biggest challenge of the
entire operation. Even after several days at sea, remaining methane and liquid oxygen present
significant safety concerns. As temperatures change, residual cryogenic propellants can
gradually warm into gaseous form. Tank pressures change. Monitoring becomes increasingly complicated.
Every movement of the spacecraft has to be carefully planned. Recovery crews must assume
hazardous conditions until proven otherwise. That's why every stage of the operation,
from towing to securing the vehicle and eventually draining remaining propellant,
requires strict safety procedures. Only after engineers confirm the tanks are safe can more
detailed inspections begin. So yes, there are risks. But none of them appear large enough to
stop SpaceX from attempting this historic recovery. If you're rooting for the recovery team,
let us know in the comments by typing, BE CAREFUL. They've certainly earned our support.
Although it's difficult to predict every detail of the recovery itself, one thing seems certain.
S40's recovery isn't just attracting attention from SpaceX fans. The entire aerospace industry
is watching. NASA included. Recovering rocket hardware isn't a new idea, but historically,
it's been relatively uncommon because most launch vehicles were designed to be expendable.
One of the best-known examples came during the Space Shuttle era. After every mission,
NASA recovered the shuttle's two solid rocket boosters. They descended under parachutes before
splashing down in the Atlantic Ocean, where the recovery ships Liberty Star and Freedom Star
located them, towed them back to port, and prepared them for refurbishment.
Over the life of the shuttle program, NASA successfully recovered roughly 270 solid
rocket boosters for inspection and reuse. That was an impressive technical accomplishment.
Economically, however, the results were less impressive. Although portions of each booster
could be reused, the refurbishment process remained expensive and labor-intensive. Salt
water had to be removed, hardware thoroughly cleaned, systems disassembled, components
inspected, and the solid rocket motors rebuilt and refilled. By the time all that work was complete,
the savings were relatively modest. In many respects, partially reusable boosters still
carried most of the costs associated with expendable hardware. Eventually, NASA moved
away from that model. Despite inheriting many technologies from the Space Shuttle,
the Space Launch System does not recover its boosters. Instead, they fall into the ocean
and are discarded after every launch. A decision that has contributed to the SLS becoming one of
the most expensive launch systems ever developed. Even before Artemis II, the program's launch
costs had become one of its most frequently criticized aspects. SpaceX took a very different
path. As NASA transitioned from the Shuttle to SLS, SpaceX invested heavily in full rocket
reusability. The company's earliest Falcon 9 landing attempts were far from perfect.
Many ended in dramatic failures. But every failure produced valuable data.
And every lesson led to improvements. In 2015, SpaceX successfully landed a Falcon 9 booster at
LZ-1 for the first time. Not long afterward came successful landings on autonomous drone
ships at sea. Those milestones fundamentally changed the launch industry. Instead of crashing
into the ocean, Falcon boosters returned to controlled landing sites, dramatically reducing
damage and making rapid reuse practical. More importantly, entire boosters, not just individual
components, could fly again. Starship is intended to take that philosophy one step further. SpaceX
has already demonstrated successful catches of the Super Heavy booster using Mechazilla's
chopstick arms. Now, the next major objective is clear. Catch the Starship upper stage. That's
where S40 becomes so important. Before attempting routine catches, engineers need to understand
exactly how Starship behaves after surviving orbital re-entry and landing. Recovering S40
gives them their first opportunity to study a largely intact vehicle in detail. Yes, this vehicle
still involves the ocean, much like NASA's shuttle booster recoveries once did. But that's only
because SpaceX hasn't reached its ultimate goal yet. The objective isn't to make ocean recoveries
routine. The objective is to eliminate them altogether. Recovering S40 provides the real-world
data needed to eventually catch Starship directly at the launch tower. That's the key difference.
This recovery isn't the destination. It's a stepping stone. That long-term vision is one
reason the mission has attracted so much attention across the aerospace industry.
Following Flight 13, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman highlighted Starship's potential, saying,
When Starship comes online, its capabilities will be game-changing, not least of which will be
ensuring we never give up the moon again. That's high praise, and it reflects just how transformative
many people believe Starship could become. Looking beyond S40 itself, SpaceX's ambitions extend far
beyond recovering spacecraft from the ocean. Ultimately, the company wants every Starship
returning directly to the launch site. Now, imagine watching both stages of the world's
largest rocket return safely to the launch tower. First, the Super Heavy booster is caught by
Mechazilla. Minutes later, Starship returns from orbit. The chopstick arms close around it once
again. Mission complete. No ocean splashdown. No lengthy recovery operation. No saltwater corrosion.
Just inspect, refuel, fly again. That's the future SpaceX is working toward.
If the company can routinely catch both the booster and the Starship upper stage,
it will accomplish something no aerospace organization has ever achieved, a fully reusable,
two-stage Super Heavy launch system. Compared with NASA's partial space shuttle booster recovery
program, the advantages are clear. No harsh marine environment. Much faster turnaround.
Far less refurbishment. Higher launch cadence. Lower operating costs. Those benefits also
strengthen SpaceX's competitive advantage. While companies like Blue Origin and several Chinese
launch providers are still working toward routine rocket reusability, SpaceX is already focused on
the next step, making an entire launch system rapidly reusable. Lower costs make more launches
possible. More launches generate more operational experience. More experience accelerates
development. It's a cycle that's extremely difficult for competitors to match, and the
impact extends far beyond launching satellites. Rapidly reusable Starships could transform lunar
exploration, Mars expeditions, orbital refueling, deep space cargo transport, and entirely new
industries in Earth orbit. That's why so many people see Starship as more than just another
rocket. It has the potential to become the foundation of humanity's next era of space
exploration. Will SpaceX recover as many spacecraft from the ocean as NASA recovered
shuttle boosters? Probably not, and that's exactly the goal. SpaceX doesn't want ocean
recoveries to become routine. It wants them to become unnecessary. S40's recovery isn't meant
to instill it, to establish a new normal. It's a bridge to a future where Starships no longer end
their missions with splashdowns at all. In many ways, this mission highlights the different
engineering philosophies of NASA and SpaceX. NASA ultimately concluded that recovering spacecraft
from the ocean offered limited economic value for long-term operations. SpaceX looked at many of
those same challenges and chose a far more ambitious path, complete reusability. Every
setback became another engineering lesson. Every failure became another opportunity to improve.
Now, that relentless approach has led the company to what may become one of the most significant
spacecraft recovery operations in aerospace history. From the Indian Ocean to the shores of
Australia, from Australia back to Starbase, every kilometer S40 travels brings engineers one step
closer to the fully reusable future SpaceX has spent years pursuing. If everything goes according
to plan, the next Starship to return home may never touch the ocean at all. That's it for today's
episode. If you enjoyed it, don't forget to leave a like, subscribe to GreatSpaceX, and ring the
notification bell so you never miss the latest updates on Starship, SpaceX, and humanity's
exciting journey into the future of space exploration. Thanks for watching and we'll see you in the next one.