Douglas Murray on the Rise of Anti-Westernism and How to Defeat It

PragerU
792 followers
600 Video Views·Nov 12, 2025
Douglas Murray speaks on gratitude, action, and the defense of Western civilization at the PragerU West Coast Gala. He warns of the growing rise of “anti-Westernism,” fueled by envy, resentment, and moral confusion on both the left and right. Emphasizing the power of Christian–Jewish partnership and the timeless virtues of aspiration and gratitude, Murray reminds us of our duty to act with courage in the time we’re given.
Watch our content ad-free on our app: https://prageru.onelink.me/3bas/vgyxvm79
Donate to PragerU: https://l.prageru.com/4jiAT85
Follow PragerU:
Instagram ➡️ (https://www.instagram.com/prageru/)
X ➡️ (https://twitter.com/prageru)
Facebook ➡️ (https://www.facebook.com/prageru/)
TikTok ➡️ (https://www.tiktok.com/@prageru)
Thank you to all of you, ladies and
gentlemen. Thank you so much, Marissa,
that for that very kind introduction and
that very heavy award. Um, I'm uh I'm
going to enjoy getting that through the
airport later tonight.
I was actually just telling Erin
backstage that many years ago I I was um
in Israel and there was a uh I was in
the town of Sterat and the mayor gave me
something which then about 15 years ago
was uh not very well known but it was a
company called from rockets to roses and
they were turning uh the Kusha rockets
that landed in their town into works of
art and um they gave me as a thank you a
tall
sort of rose that had been made out of
this rocket with a very heavy base and
as I say the company was new. I was
going through Bengurian airport the next
day uh to head back to my then home in
London and uh the
Lal security staff who some of you will
have had the pleasure of meeting
uh said uh anyone give you anything
while you're in Israel and I said yes
this and I opened my bag and I showed
them this and uh they were looking at it
eventually they brought over all their
friends and everybody in the airport was
looking at the gift that I declared and
eventually I explained it and about half
an hour later the LA man said uh so uh
apart from Kusha rocket anyone give you
anything in Israel
because
um
I wanted to just say a few things uh
tonight in the time that we're together
um as Marissa was very kind to note I uh
I left my home in London some five years
ago to move to New York and uh I suppose
I'm open to offers of where to move
next. Um uh and um there's a lot to say
about um some of the things that are
going on in all of our countries in the
west at the moment. But
I wanted to talk about two things in
particular. Um you know many centuries
ago Martin Luther the great figure of
the reformation in Europe observed that
uh mankind is like a drunkard on a
horse. He uh he falls off the horse to
the right. He clambers back on and he
falls off to the left.
Martin Luther was not talking
politically, not least because it would
be some centuries before the idea of
left or right even entered the political
lexicon. But it's been on my mind
recently this uh idea of falling off the
horse to the left or to the right.
in uh New York as as you all know uh
we've just had somebody who is a
self-revoured self-declared completely
proud
socialist
among other things. Uh the president of
course says he's a communist. Uh you
might all have your own views about
that. But it seemed inconceivable until
very recently
that somebody whose politics are founded
in
anti-westernism
uh should be in charge of the greatest
city in the world, the biggest most
important city in America. Sorry to
those of you who are locals here, but
that's just the stats. It seemed
impossible to people that you'd actually
have somebody who has declared
repeatedly that his politics are founded
in this anti-westernism that is also of
course anti- capitalism
of course anti-Israelism.
What exactly the ideology of our new
mayor is is disputed by some, but I
think it's actually rather obvious. Uh
his own father laid down the blueprint
for his career. Uh his father of course
is a Colombia professor and who could
think that anything bad could come out
of Colombia.
The mayor by the way has the the uh
extraordinary distinction of having a
parent on the faculty of Colombia but
couldn't get in himself.
Um
um but his father's own work is is
dedicated to what is known as third
worldism.
It is the belief that essentially
everything that we have in the west is
the problem is the cause of all the
world's problems.
Nothing in the rest of the world can go
wrong unless we have made it so. They
can look at China will say well aren't
there human rights abuses and they'll
say well look at the opium wars.
this is uh you can say something that is
going wrong in the Middle East or the
Far East and they will say but
colonialism.
You'll point out some human rights abuse
on the other end of the planet and they
will say what about the slave trade as
if this was something that only America
ever engaged in. this third worldism or
anti-westernism
has never had such a prominent advocate
at the heart of America.
And this, it seems to me, presents a
huge challenge to those of us on the
right, those of us on the conservative
side, because we at least have to engage
with what arguments people like Mandani
put across.
Sometimes people put across the argument
in response to people like him that
there's some specific issue that you can
nyx.
And I just wanted to say that that's in
my view massively understating and
minimizing the scale of the challenge
that somebody like him poses.
Some people in the room I've discussed
this with many times before, but
essentially what somebody like Mamani is
relying on is a set of very basic base
human instincts which the conservative
side has to be able to respond to. The
base instincts are essentially envy and
resentment.
And you cannot reply to appeals to envy
and resentment by merely talking about
zoning regulations.
You can't.
You have to find your own way to appeal
to equally deep instincts.
And I'll come on to that in a second.
But one of the things that's probably on
many of your minds as it is on mine at
the moment is that just as we've seen
people drunkenly fall off the horse on
the left, so we've seen some people
drunkenly fall off the horse on the
right.
This is something which it's worth
lingering over particularly in this
esteemed gathering here tonight because
perhaps the greatest critique that the
right has been able to have of the
American left in recent years is that
they haven't been able to keep their
extremes away from their center.
Remember that just go back five years.
What were the most useful things for
Republicans that Democrats said?
Defund the police. What a stupid slogan.
What a stupid, stupid slogan. And the
fact that people like Kala Harris and
others were willing to entertain this,
to flirt with it, to play with it, to
pander to it was catastrophic
for the Democrats at the ballot box.
Every one of the slogans, every one of
the things, the deranged things that the
left did in recent years was incredibly
advantageous to Republicans. What
greater gift did the Republican party
have in recent years than the squad?
Donald Trump couldn't have hoped for a
better group of critics than the squad.
And the fact that the Democratic Party
seemed incapable of distancing itself
indeed became completely wrapped up with
the most extreme bits of their own side.
They they got wrapped up with the people
who believe that none of us are born
with any genitalia that's discernible.
Doctors just sort of guess it.
A bigoted nurse decides it's a boy or a
girl. And
this stuff was devastating for the
political left.
Well, I would say we now on the
political right have things that are
equally potentially devastating.
The most potentially devastating one we
have at the moment is something which
people in this room have been close to,
I've been close to. There are
individuals, some of whom were friends,
some of whom may be able to remain
friends at some point or be friends
again. But we have people on our own
side who are playing with things that
are utterly disastrous for the
conservative cause.
The most obvious one, the most obvious
one, the stupidest one, so stupid that
again I can't believe it hasn't been
somehow mandated
by the Democrat party's headquarters,
is the fact that prominent conservative
commentators and podcasters
would be playing with the most evil
viruses of the 20th century.
Nothing is more delegitimizing
for the conservative side than to have
people who claim to be on the
conservative side playing footsie with
Nazis and anti-semites and racists.
Nothing can be more destructive for our
side than people like Tucker Carlson who
give the most virulent
hardedged attack interview they possibly
can to Senator Ted Cruz
and then play the fluffer to Nick
Fuentes.
[Applause]
If
if the political right doesn't address
this and say you can say what you want
but it doesn't mean that we have to
beguard you as an ally then we are in
real trouble. You know I've noticed
since I've moved to America that
something I said would happen some years
ago has been happening which is in the
moral vacuum the moral disaster of the
last 20 years there are several things
that stand out. One is that after the
2008 financial crash, it was not
inevitable that if young people couldn't
accumulate capital that they would
become capitalists. We have to address
that problem. But it also seemed to me
that into the religious vacuum that had
emerged in recent decades, things would
tread.
Now we saw the left. They had the gender
ideology, the uh sexual ideology, the
race and all of that. And for a time for
them uh going around and waving banners
every Saturday and so on provided them
with meaning. It was also inevitable
that the right would have to address
this
hole, this vacuum as well. And some
people have, but some of the people
who've trotten into that have done so in
an incredibly ill-advised way, partly
because they have not listened to good
mentors like Dennis Prager has been to
so many. They have fallen into clerical
attitudes,
very far right-wing Catholic attitudes,
very ill-informed
in which they seem to think, for
instance, I am not kidding or
exaggerating when I say this, that they
would effectively like to have, for
instance, Catholic clerical law in the
United States in the 21st century. I
said to one of the advocates of this a
little a little while ago, you know, I'm
not in favor of that. Partly because
although I wasn't alive in Europe in the
16th century, I did hear about it.
And by the way, for those who are
Catholics who think that in any way a
Christian America would accept Catholic
cardinal law, they ought to realize that
they themselves would be a religious
minority in such a state and would be
hanged from the lamposts by the
Protestants.
This is, to put it mildly, unbelievably
frivolous, but also dangerous stuff to
be playing with. When the Heritage
Foundation had its town hall the other
day, a young woman said to Kevin Roberts
that she was opposed to what she called
Christian Zionism because she said she
regards it as a heresy.
Who told her it was a heresy? Tucker
Carlson told her it was a heresy. I can
tell her some other heresies and I could
list off many more than she can in her
short time in the Catholic faith.
I could talk to her about, for instance,
the fact that Pope John V 6 said many
decades ago
that the relationship between the Jewish
people and the Christian people was
absolutely central to the future of
Christianity as well as Judaism. I could
point her to the works of Joseph
Ratzinger or the vital and significant
work that Pope John Paul II did for
Christian Jewish relations.
I really hope that young people like
that don't go through what the continent
I'm from went through for centuries.
There's a reason why Queen Elizabeth I
said one of the most important things
about religion that anyone has said when
she said, "I do not make windows into
men's souls."
Those people from the American right who
really do wish to open windows into
men's souls and judge other Americans by
these standards should just consider
what will happen if it comes to them.
And I would place one on the table
straight away. Some of these people on
the new American right like to blame the
Jewish people for the fact that for
instance there are prominent Jews in
various positions who say things they
disagree with. They often point to the
fact which is a fact that many open
borders organizations
are dominated by prominent liberal Jews.
That's absolutely true. And there's not
one of those organizations that I
haven't criticized.
However, these people who like to say
that as a result, Jews should be held
responsible for open borders policies
might take this little warnings from
this non-atholic from Britain.
The most prominent open borders advocate
in recent years has been the pope.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay.
Not just this pope, but his
predecessors. The people of the island
of Lampaduza in Italy, where I was when
I was writing my book, The Strange Death
of Europe, are fed up with popes coming
to Lampaduza expressing sympathy for
migrants and none for the people who
live on Lampaduza.
But here's the thing. Do you want us who
are not Catholics to blame Catholics in
America for your liberal open borders
popes? I hope not. You wouldn't like it
if we did. So don't do it to the Jews.
Let me say just a couple of other
things. The first is I said earlier we
have to find things to respond
not just to the right where it's gone
wrong but also of course to the left.
And by the way, what a what a great sign
it would be in this country if whereas
the left can't control its borders
politically, socially, hygienically the
right could. What a good thing that
would be for the right in this country.
But I said that we have to find ways to
reply to the deep things. And I believe
on these issues, as Dennis Prager and
others have said for years, we have all
of the best cards.
Let me give you one.
The left, as I said with Mandani and
others, is focused on the politics of
envy and resentment.
How do you counter that?
I'll give you a couple of examples. One,
the greatest example in America of all,
aspiration.
Aspiration. the knowledge that if you
work hard, you will improve your lot in
life and the lot in life of the people
you love. If we make this work in
America, we can destroy the left's
appeal to resentment. Let me give you
two others.
Gratitude.
Gratitude.
You know, the people who are currently
playing with the darkest aspects against
religious freedom should remember
the great luck we have here in America.
Most countries in the world do not have
religious freedom. What did Thomas
Jefferson ask to be put on his
gravestone?
Most of you here will know this, but Mr.
Jefferson himself asked on his
gravestone to be written that he was the
author of the Declaration of
Independence,
the author of the Statute of Virginia
for religious freedom and the father of
the University of Virginia.
because these were the things he was
proudest of. That the statute on
religious freedom broke something that
had torn Europe apart for years and
solved it.
These are gifts we have been given in
America.
Many many other gifts exist in this land
as well. But if we remind people that
what we have we are lucky to have and
not just random luck but because it has
been given to us by people who thought
and judged wisely
and that is why we're here.
[Applause]
Finally, I wanted to say
the other thing on the side of the
American right and conservatives is the
significance of the individual.
The left talks in grandiose terms, but
also nonhuman terms. It talks about
class struggle. It talks about
economics. It talks about all its
vaguely Marxist or watered down Marxist
views of how society works. But what
they cannot account for ever
is the individual.
And you might say, well, the great man,
the great woman theory of history,
that's so dated. No, it isn't. That is a
deliberately derinating and demoralizing
line of the left to pretend that
individuals don't make the course of
history. They do.
And it's not just
that the course of history is made by
presidents, by kings,
senators, even some congressmen.
it is that it is made by every
individual including those in this room.
Let me finish by citing something that
has been much on my mind in the last few
days.
Some years ago um I did an uh interview
a video for Prageru in the great book
series that Michael Nolles was doing.
You know, Michael Nolles, he's very
shoddy looking, badly dressed
guy, deeply in need of a tailor. Um,
uh, the wonderful Michael Nolles, uh,
Dennis's suggestion, decided to do a set
of interviews with people about great
books. It's a wonderful series. I hope
that, uh, many of you will know it. As
with so many of the Prebeu videos, it's
gone so far and so wide. And uh Michael
asked which great book I wanted to do
and I said to him I'd like to do I said
this is a bit of a cheat but I'd like to
do King Lear which is of course a play
not a book but it's published in a book
form so I thought I could get away with
it.
There's something in that that I
mentioned to Michael during that
interview which I'd like to finish with
by sharing you here tonight.
At the midnight of the play, something
extraordinary happens.
Gloss though, one of the few good people
in the play is going to be blinded.
His eyes used to be torn out by two of
his enemies, one of Lear's daughters and
her husband.
And whenever I think about King Leer, I
always think about this scene. But I
also think of something that one of the
great Christians of the 20th century, CS
Lewis, said about this play. And I
wanted to share it with you.
He asks how we as humans can act in the
world. And he asks it by going to this
scene, act three, scene seven of King
Lear. I hesitate talking about any play
in the presence of a great actor like
John Voit but allow me to get away with
it.
[Applause]
This is what CS Lewis says about our
position in life. He says we are not the
playright,
we are not the producer. We are not even
the audience. We are on the stage.
To play well the scenes in which we are
on concerns us much more than to guess
about the scenes that follow. In King
Lear act 3 scene seven. He says there is
a man who is such a minor character that
Shakespeare has not even given him a
name. He is merely first servant.
All the characters around him, Rean,
Cornwall, and Edmund, have fine
long-term plans. They think they know
how the story is going to end. And they
are quite wrong.
The servant has no such delusions.
He has no notion how the play is going
to go, but he understands the present
scene.
He sees an abomination, the blinding of
Glouester,
and it's taking place, and he will not
stand it.
His sword is out and pointed at his
master's breast in a moment. Then Rean
stabs him dead from behind.
That is his whole part.
Not even eight lines all told.
But if it were real life and not a play,
that is the part it would have been best
to have acted.
We don't know which scene in the play
we're in. We don't even know if it's a
comedy or a tragedy, some combination of
both.
But one thing we do have a say in, as
Dennis Dennis Prager has shown, as some
remarkable people in this room continue
to show, and as Dennis continues to
show, the one thing we can choose is to
act the best we can in the times we find
ourselves in.
So, thank you.
