Evropa se pohybuje doprava. To je téma dnešního pořadu. A stejně tak je pozoruhodné, že jejími lídry jsou stále častěji ženy. To je důstojné téma, protože přemýšlíme o globálním klimatu. Ne, ne, ne o klimatickém alarmismu, kterým vás straší OSN a Joe Biden, ale o politickém klimatu a o tom, jakým směrem se svět ubírá.
Jsme ve světě probuzených wokeistů. Probuzenství nenakazilo jen Spojené státy, ale rozšířilo se jako rakovina po celém světě, ať už jde o klimatický alarmismus, redefinici pohlaví nebo imigraci.
Svět má společné problémy. Ale možná ještě důležitější je, že se do popředí dostala světová ekonomika, protože Evropa je do značné míry závislá na ruské ropě a plynu. A vzhledem ke stále zuřící válce na Ukrajině musely evropské země přehodnotit, jak vypadá jejich budoucnost. Dokonce i v otázkách, jako jsou potraty zaujímají evropští představitelé silnější postoj.
Chci se zaměřit na několik nově zvolených lídrů a na to, jak chtějí změnit budoucnost svých zemí.
Welcome to The Beau Show.
Europe moves to the right.
That is the subject of today's show.
And just as notably, its leaders are increasingly female.
This is a worthy topic as we think about the global climate.
No, no, not the climate alarmism that the United Nations
and Joe Biden fear monger you about,
but just the political climate and the way the world is going.
We are in a woke world.
Wokeness has not just infected the United States,
but it has spread like a cancer worldwide.
Whether it's climate alarmism, gender redefinition,
or immigration, the world has its collective issues.
But perhaps more importantly, the world economy has come into focus
as Europe has relied a great deal on Russia's oil and gas.
And with the war in Ukraine still raging on,
European countries have had to rethink how their future looks.
Even on issues like abortion,
European leaders are taking a stronger stand.
I want to focus on a few newly elected leaders
and how they aim to reshape their respective countries' futures.
Let's first turn to Hungary,
where the people elected Katalin Novak.
She was formerly Hungary's minister of families.
Just 10 years ago, Hungary's population was in decline.
There were even some years where there were more abortions than births,
if you can believe that.
The divorce rate was high as well.
Novak implemented policies that encouraged families to have more babies.
Working Hungarian women who have four children no longer pay income taxes.
They get three years off of work to care for their babies.
Couples can get a $30,000 loan to help buy an interest-free house,
and repayment goes down with each child they have.
The result?
Well, marriages are up 83%,
divorce is at a 60-year low,
and the abortion rate has dropped.
Here she is discussing her philosophy.
Most important outcomes of our 10-year family-friendly
or family-oriented policy is that the abortions dropped by 41%.
And I think that we still have work to be done in this matter
because we have to point out the value of life.
These policies were added to the Hungarian constitution,
and they even clarified something that U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Ketanji Brown-Jackson would not.
The constitution reads,
the mother shall be a woman,
the father shall be a man.
They also passed a law that allows parents to have more say
in their kids' education with respect to sexual instruction.
This was, of course, a very DeSantis-like thing to do.
Novak is decidedly pro-Christian and pro-family.
But these new changes angered European Union,
which called them anti-LGBTQ.
The EU even threatened sanctions on Hungary for these actions,
which, if you think about it,
they should be far more worried about other things than that.
Here's President Novak again.
I've never had the intention to have an international attention
focusing on us or teaching lessons to anybody,
but we don't want to be taught any lessons either.
So even though she isn't trying to call attention to Hungary
or virtue signal like so many leaders do,
in a way, Hungary is becoming an example.
But she's doing what she feels is best for her country
and what the people elected her to do.
And it is clear that with respect to declining population
and increasing abortions,
she has reversed that trend
and made Hungary a more family-friendly country.
Families are the building blocks of society.
And it's interesting how she gets criticized by the EU
for being pro-family.
They seem to have no concern about declining populations
and are more concerned about fringe identity issues.
Now let's move over to Italy,
where Prime Minister Giorgia Maloney has been elected.
But before I do so,
I want you to notice how media outlets describe her
before you even learn a single thing about her.
So take a look at this.
From CBS News,
who is Giorgia Maloney,
the woman expected to become
Italy's new right-wing prime minister?
From NBC News,
far-right nationalist Giorgia Maloney
elected as Italy's first female prime minister.
From CNBC,
far-right Italian politician Giorgia Maloney
elected Italy's first female PM.
From Channel 4 News,
Italy's set to elect most right-wing government
since World War II.
And from MSNBC,
fascism is on the rise in Europe,
not just in the US.
When you search for her name on YouTube,
these are the headlines that come up.
They're not commending her
for being Italy's first female prime minister,
which usually they would.
They want you to think
that she's a far-right fascist,
a female Mussolini.
CNN has said so,
so it must be true, right?
VICE News parodied that same headline.
Maloney, Mussolini.
Te rima.
Maloney built herself from the ground up
in the Brothers of Italy party.
Let's hear her philosophy.
Because it defines us,
because it's our identity.
Because everything that defines us
in this time is an enemy.
For those who would like
that we no longer have an identity
and that we were only slaves,
perfect consumers.
And then it's under attack
national identity,
it's under attack religious identity,
it's under attack gender identity,
it's under attack family identity.
I don't have to be able to define
Italian, Christian,
woman, mother, no.
I have to be citizen X,
gender X,
parent 1,
parent 2,
I have to be a number.
Because when I'll only be a number,
when I'll no longer have an identity,
when I'll no longer have roots,
well then I'll be the perfect slave
in the bag of great financial speculation.
The perfect consumer.
And this is the reason why
this is the reason why
today we are so afraid.
This is the reason why today
this appointment is so scary.
Because we don't want to be numbers,
we are here to say
that we are not numbers,
we will defend the value of the human person,
of every single human person,
because each of us
has a unique and unrepeatable genetic code.
And this is a sacred Noah's ark.
We will defend it,
we will defend God,
the father and the family
who disgust someone so much.
We will do it to defend our freedom
because we will never be
slaves and simple consumers
in the bag of financial speculation.
Here is our mission,
here is why I came here today.
Chesterton wrote more than a century ago,
let's see if I can find it,
fires will be lit
to show that 2 plus 2 is 4.
Swords will be sharpened
to show that leaves are green in summer.
That time has come, gentlemen.
We are ready.
Thank you.
This is a very fiery speech from Maloney
and it's delivered in a very Trumpian
style.
It's a punch back against leftism and globalism.
It's about identity and sovereignty.
Her point about being not just a number,
just a consumer,
just a comrade is correct.
Progressivism takes all of the individuality
out of society
and she evokes Chesterton
to make the point
that fires will be made
and swords will be drawn
just to prove the things
we already know to be true,
like 2 and 2 make 4
and that leaves are green in summer.
Maloney is defiant in her defense
of family,
God and country
and those are the three bedrocks
of any society.
One of her fellow brothers
of Italy party members
made the point
that there is a difference
between acknowledging the rights
of other groups,
for instance,
in civil unions or marriage
as distinguished from a lobby
which wants to transform
and upend society.
And as I said earlier,
Europe has been dealing
with the immigration problem
as well.
Many Europeans are fed up
and rightly so.
We deal with this same immigration issue
here in America
where Joe Biden has allowed
a record number,
2 million immigrants
to illegally cross into this country
and so governors have had
to ship those immigrants
to their doorstep.
Europe has dealt with Arab migrants
that have been scattered
all throughout
these various countries.
Italians had become fed up
with the Draghi government.
Which got them into
some serious financial trouble.
And the brothers of Italy
stayed out of joining
the government on principle.
So this populist,
nationalist movement
is something Italians
can believe in.
Much the same way
that Americans saw Donald Trump
as an outsider
who wasn't drunk on DC power.
And Trump delivered
on the things
they elected him to do.
He rejected socialism
and woke-ism.
He got the economy zooming.
He tightened up border policies.
So Italians likely see
the same hope
in Georgia Maloney.
But if we turn to the UK,
Britons probably saw
that same hope
in Boris Johnson
as he navigated Brexit.
But Boris got drunk
on his own power,
holding parties during COVID.
He proved to be
an impotent leader
of the Conservative Party
and the UK as Prime Minister.
He joined the
climate paranoia bandwagon.
So in the end,
he stepped down
because he had lost
Brits' confidence.
And now the Conservatives
have elected
a new Conservative leader,
Liz Truss.
The British pound
had been declining
and Truss is a financial mind.
So rather than me explaining it,
I'll let the bright guy,
economist Stephen Moore
and Larry Kudlow explain it.
Well, Larry, look,
Liz Truss is turning
into a hero.
I had some doubts about her
when she was first nominated,
but she has been a superstar.
I mean, it's hard to find
anything not to like
about what she has done so far.
You mentioned the tax cuts.
You mentioned that,
by the way,
she wants to take
that top tax rate,
Larry, from 45 down to 40 percent,
very much like what you guys did
in the Trump administration
in lowering our taxes.
And that caused the economic boom
and more tax revenues.
This is a very sound policy.
Britain's going to go
from one of the highest tax rates
now down towards the middle.
That's going to attract capital.
She's cutting 1 percent
off of income taxes
for all workers.
Fantastic.
Let's reward work.
It's it's very related
to your previous discussion
with with Kevin McCarthy.
We've got to reward work
and reward people
for getting back in the labor force.
She's pro fracking.
Did you know that, Larry?
She's in favor of fracking.
They have an energy crisis going on.
Britain has a lot of energy.
They have a lot of oil and gas
that they should be using,
and she's in favor of that.
She's in favor of a hiring
freeze by government.
Great idea.
So this is a you know
what I call this, Larry.
This is Bidenomics in reverse.
It's it's fantastic.
And look, the people in the in her camp
are looking at what's
happening in the United States.
The disaster that's happened
under Joe Biden,
that 21 were down 25 percent
in real terms or something like that
with respect to the stock market.
So I don't I don't
have a good explanation
for why the market
has fallen there in Britain.
But I'll tell you this,
if she can get this all done,
she is going to be
the next Margaret Thatcher.
Well, I'm just saying
the the latest drop
in the British pen
British has been falling a long time
because Boris Johnson
was running Joe Biden,
progressive big policies.
That's exactly right.
And Boris, you know, nice person,
knowing well and so forth
down through the years.
But, you know, he was running
an anti fossil fuel policy.
So this is critical.
Kudlow and more talk about how Boris
was running a Biden like economy,
much to British demise.
Trust, on the other hand,
has a very different philosophy.
And if successful,
could really pull the UK
up out of the doldrums.
Let's hear from Liz Trust herself.
We want people to keep
more of the money they earn
so they can have more control
of their own lives
and contribute to the future.
Secondly, it means securing
affordable and reliable
supplies of energy.
We are cutting off
the toxic power and pipelines
from authoritarian regimes
and strengthening
our energy resilience.
We will ensure that we can't
be coerced or harmed
by the reckless actions
of rogue actors abroad.
And we will transition to a future
based on renewable
and nuclear energy,
while ensuring the gas used
during that transition
is from reliable sources,
including our own North Sea production.
We will be a net energy exporter
by 2040.
Thirdly, we're safeguarding
the security of our economy,
the supply chains,
the critical minerals,
the food, the technology
that drive growth
and protect the lives
and health of people.
We won't be strategically dependent
on those who seek
to weaponize the global economy.
Do you hear these tenets?
Citizens keeping more
of their own hard-earned money,
energy independence,
and net energy exporter,
reliable sources?
See, these are the policies
that make nations great.
They rely on sovereignty
and independence.
And we saw that
many European nations
found themselves in a quagmire
when relying upon Russian energy.
Vladimir Putin used this
to his advantage.
And here's the problem with that.
If a big economy like Germany
goes into recession
and has an energy crisis,
you will see the de-industrialization
of Germany.
Just as we head
into these cold winter months.
With less energy availability,
you'll see a drop off of production
from cars to other materials.
This could spell disaster
for Germany
and other dependent nations.
But now let's shift
to another female leader
and the youngest of Europe,
Finland's Prime Minister
Sanna Merin,
who became Prime Minister
at the age of 34.
She is a member
of the Socialist Democrats
and has championed
many liberal progressive causes.
Her millennial disposition
and breastfeeding selfies
seem to have attracted
a younger voting demographic.
However, her partying ways
have perhaps attracted
the wrong kind of attention.
Videos like this
and topless with her friends
and her residents
have called her suitability
as a leader into question.
And while people can appreciate
the normalcy
and the authenticity
of a person who has become a leader,
voters expect results.
Her supporters say
the criticism is misogynist.
But look at Boris Johnson.
He got in trouble
with the public
for the same thing.
Mind you, it wasn't topless.
Thank heavens.
So it's not misogynist
to criticize a Prime Minister
partying in a Helsinki nightclub.
And again,
it may not be the partying
that's the problem,
but the lack of leadership, perhaps.
As Finland's center-right
National Coalition party
is picking up steam
and likely to unseat Merin in 2023.
And if Merin's biggest accomplishment
is leading Finland to NATO,
well, that's only going to
inflame tensions with Putin.
Remember that
Finland's top marginal tax rate
is upwards of 60 percent,
some of the highest in the world.
But what's more,
Finland doesn't just tax the rich more.
They tax everyone
as if they were rich.
So this is an opposite approach
of Liz Truss,
who wants people to keep
more of their own money.
Someone who is more concerned
with her own country's welfare
than a collectivist
Kumbaya EU approach.
Poland and Hungary
shut their borders off from migrants
from Syria, Afghanistan,
Iraq and other countries.
Sweden, especially under the leadership
by their Social Democrat party,
had long accepted all kinds of migrants.
They welcomed it.
But in 2015, that changed
as the influx of largely Muslim migrants
put their social welfare system
into overdrive.
It overwhelmed it.
Malmo became a hotbed of rape
and Sharia law implementation.
For this reason,
the Swedish Democrat party,
a right of center party
with strong immigration policy,
rose to prominence.
So even Sweden decided
it could no longer handle mass immigration.
And if you'll notice,
all the leaders that I've spoken about
have had to face this immigration issue
in one way or another.
But have demanded
a more responsible border policy
to curb the influx of immigrants
that overwhelm their economic
and welfare systems.
These leaders recognize
that a nation must have its own borders,
language and culture.
What their detractors do
is try to paint them as neo-Nazis
or fascists.
The way I showed you
the YouTube results turn up
on Georgia Maloney.
It's exactly what the media
did to Donald Trump.
And they feel that
if they repeat the lie enough,
it'll stick.
But in spite of this,
the citizens of these respective countries,
Hungary, Italy, the UK
and even Poland,
have wised up
and have seen the writing on the wall.
They've seen the inflation,
the energy crisis,
the immigration consequences
and the dire straits.
And they've decided to elect leaders
that are more world-wise
rather than utopian dreamers.
Boris Johnson made the huge error
of embracing the COP26 climate agenda.
He must have wanted to be liked or something.
But in the end,
he couldn't even practice
what he preached.
He was a sore disappointment
for the Brits.
Liz Truss is a female
who has stepped into this mess
with a much more pragmatic approach.
And as Larry Kudlow pointed out,
when the UK previously raised taxes,
they did not see a net increase in revenue.
However,
under Kudlow's leadership in the Trump years,
tax cuts created revenue.
So in general,
what you see is a knee-jerk reaction by media
to paint these new leaders in a certain way.
None of them can seem to celebrate
the novelty of female leadership,
such as Italy's first female prime minister.
However,
when New Zealand got a new female prime minister,
Jacinda Ardern,
the media lapped it up
and heaped praise on her
for her pandemic response and lockdowns
that sent the New Zealand economy
into severe double-digit recession.
Some journalists even got criticized
for their line of questioning
during Ardern's COVID press conferences,
which that's odd,
considering that it is the press's job
to ask tough questions
relevant to the public.
But if you compare the media's handling of Ardern
versus Truss, Maloney or Novak,
you'll see a night and day difference.
It also stands in stark contrast
to the public's view of Hillary Clinton
and Kamala Harris,
two of the least liked female public figures
in the United States.
Clinton's presidential hopes
were constantly crushed.
And Kamala's swift exit
from the Democratic primaries
was only saved
by Joe Biden's virtue signal
to have a female VP.
He just happened to pick
the least well-liked female in his party,
other than maybe Nancy Pelosi.
However, when you look at some of the new
rock stars of the Republican Party,
many are female.
Marsha Blackburn,
Elise Stefanik,
Kristi Noem,
Condi Rice,
Maitre Flores,
and the rising star from Arizona,
Carrie Lake.
All these women have proposed
strong border policies.
And of course, the media
doesn't like any of them.
The pandemic proved to be a test
of what bad economic minds can do.
And the debt and inflation crisis chickens
have now come home to roost.
So, for instance,
Draghi, this supposed financial whiz,
turned Italy into a total mess.
Hence, the rise of Giorgio Meloni.
The Brothers of Italy
were able to fill in this void
and rise to popularity rather quickly.
Not because Italy became fascist again,
but because they wanted
to make Italy great again.
And what these female leaders propose
is not radical.
It's, in fact, traditional.
It just seems radical
to anyone who embraces Marxism.
If a nation has an underpopulation problem,
you have to incentivize the family.
And it worked in Hungary.
When immigration overwhelms your resources
and increases crime,
you have to seal it up.
When spending is out of control,
you have to curtail it.
You'll never be able to borrow
your way out of debt.
So, in some ways,
these females of Europe
have been elected as both
economic and social minds.
And good for Europeans
for electing them to do the job
that their male predecessors could not.
The difference is,
they didn't elect these women
just because they were women
on an identity politics basis.
They elected these women
to help their respective countries
find their identities again
and also stand up
for the identity of the individual.
To be not just a number
easily manipulated
in the financial system,
but an actual person
with an income,
a family,
and a dream.
And as we change the lens
from Europe to America,
the same is true.
Democrats wanted to herald
the first female VP.
But she has been inept
on the border issue
where Joe Biden put her in charge.
Meanwhile,
in the border state of Arizona,
a female like Carrie Lake
has proposed a tough border policy.
And Arizonans seem to have
responded to that.
If the future is indeed female,
there are some formidable women
in the pack right now,
both in America and in Europe.
And they're getting elected
on sensible policy,
not on things like this.
Break it down in layman's terms
for people who don't understand
what's going on
and how can this directly affect
the people of the United States.
So Ukraine is a country in Europe.
It exists next to
another country called Russia.
We campaign with the plan.
Uppercase T, uppercase P, the plan.
Do you plan to visit the border?
Not today.
But I have before
and I'm sure I will again.
I've said I'm going to go to the border.
And when are you going to the border,
Vice President?
The administration has asked.
I'm not finished.
We've been to the border.
So this whole, this whole,
this whole thing about the border.
You haven't been to the border.
And I haven't been to Europe.
And I don't,
I don't understand the point that you're making.
The difference between her
and the trio of European leaders
that I presented in this show is stark.
Europe is facing some dark days ahead.
So let's hope that these new leaders
can weather the storm
and steer the ship back to prosperity.
I'm Beau, and that's the show.