Where are the construction photos of Bucharest’s Palace of Parliament (“Buried” History from 1984?)

Howdy y'all, welcome back, thank you for being here. Basically, in this video, we'll be looking at the Palace of Parliament. There are almost no existing construction photographs of the Palace of Parliament. And when you look at the building, it's absolutely immense, absolutely old world looking in nature. And when we say old world, we're just talking about buildings that look very similar to the buildings that were being constructed all throughout our realm, all over the planet before the year 1900. We have a very similar aesthetic value that's being placed on the construction that was taking place before the turn of the century into the 20th. So that is why we call it old world style architecture. Now the Palace of Parliament, on the other hand, while looking old world, was actually said to have been founded in 1984. So that's rather recently. Again, that's about 40 years ago, 41 years ago is when construction was said to have begun on this palace. And yet, we do not have any construction photographs. And the few that were available really did appear to show a building that was being excavated and not constructed. So I had to do my own research looking into this just to give you a little bit more information and also to try to figure out why we do not have construction photographs of this Palace of Parliament in Bucharest, as it is one of the largest buildings in the entire world and one of the greatest examples of architecture in the last 100 years. So let's get right into this history. And right off the bat, I will let you know that there is apparently in the current narrative, so take it all with a grain of salt, but there is a reason that we do not have construction photographs. And there's also many reasons why we don't have photographs of this palace in general. The Palace of Parliament, also known as the House of the Republic or the People's House, is the seat of government for all of Romania. And it's located in the national capital of Bucharest. The building stands 276 feet tall and it's 3,930,000 square feet of floor space, having a volume of over 90 million cubic feet. It's also the heaviest building in the entire world, weighing over 4 million tons or over 9 billion pounds. Now we're told that this building was designed by one Anca Petruscu and she had a degree that was obtained in Bucharest, of all places, in 1973. And upon graduation, she was immediately involved, we're told in this narrative, and it seems like plausible deniability, but she was involved in the demolishing of Old World Bucharest or the old city of Bucharest. And then at age 28, she apparently won the contest with no experience, no architectural background besides her degree, but she had never actually designed a building that had been built. With no experience, she led a team of over 700 architects beginning work on June 25th, to construct the world's most expensive administrative building in the history of mankind, the heaviest building in the world at over 9 billion pounds, a building that was 276 feet tall upon completion and contained over 3,900,000 square feet of floor space. So again, how could someone who had never actually designed or architected a building before have been responsible for the largest building or one of the largest buildings in the history of mankind, the largest building to have been created in the old world style in the last 100 years? Keep the name of this young lady architect Anca Petruscu in mind because she will come up later in the narrative and it's honestly so fascinating. It's also what appears to be a facet of plausible deniability or just something that's been written into the narrative, a piece of the history that doesn't exactly make sense, but it helps to gloss over other facets of the narrative so we don't do any questioning. Now back into this palace of parliament, the heaviest building ever created in the history of mankind. It was located on an ancient location that was known as Boreas Hill or Uranus Hill. Now this hill that the palace of parliament sits upon was an ancient mound on which the city of Bucharest, the old city was formed. And this was said to have began with a world famous vineyard that was operated here for centuries beginning sometime before the 16th century. We're told a castle like fortified church was also founded on Uranus Hill around the year 1765. And this seemed to go hand in hand with another castle like structure that was founded here. And it appears just from what we know from researching the old world, the history of mounds and tells and kurgans that there may have been a fortified structure, a castle like structure here for hundreds, if not thousands of years before the written narrative. But I digress. We're told after the fortified church was founded here, we have the new court, another castle like structure that was founded on Uranus Hill in 1776. And this was the princely fortified court for the kingdom of Wallachia. The new court was a large fortified castle and it was indeed linked to the church through underground chambers. It also contained Romania's largest wine cellar. Now this massive castle like new court was supposedly burnt down in a massive fire in 1812, but it was not completely demolished until 1986 with the founding of the Palace of Parliament. Now another thing that's important about this hill that the Palace of Parliament was founded on and the Palace of Parliament wasn't necessarily founded on the hill, but the hill itself was almost completely demolished to make way for this palace. However, in some theories, in some hypothesis, others will argue that the hill was cleared away and what was left behind was the palace. But again, I digress. Now another important thing that happened here on the Uranus Hill was the closing or final, the last battle of the revolution of Wallachia. This revolution occurred here in 1848 and after the revolution of Wallachia, after this castle like structure or these different castle like structures that were apparently linked underground, after they fell during the revolution of 1848, we're told a massive castle like arsenal was founded on the exact location of the other castle like structures. Do you again see how this could be plausible deniability? How we have different versions of the same narrative being given to us over and over again as if history is cyclical and we know that it is based off the narratives, but that in itself could just be seen as another form of this so-called plausible deniability. But I digress. Now, when Uranus Hill was raised for the founding of the palace of parliament, we're told of all things, a massive burial mound was said to have existed within Uranus Hill, meaning that all of the castle like structures that existed here and then the old city of Bucharest that was formed on top of this hill, all of that was said to be constructed on even earlier burial mounds that were founded here at some point when a version or a form of the black plague reached Bucharest. Again, it all seems like it doesn't exactly add up. Now, the palace of parliament was made possible, we're told in this narrative by the great earthquake of 1977, which we're told leveled almost all of the old city of Bucharest. The demolition of Uranus Hill took almost two years to complete and yet we have no photographs and we're told over 40,000 people lost their homes or their businesses at this time. Basically, at least in the narrative, we're given that the government of Romania relocated these individuals, but again, when we look at firsthand accounts from this time period when this process was actually taking place, it appears that many, many were left homeless. Now, in the construction of the palace of parliament in Bucharest, we're told upwards of 100,000 workers were used at this time. However, what's not often brought into the limelight is that a large portion of these workers were prisoners and many of these prisoners were being assisted by untrained novice soldiers, meaning a majority of this absolutely beautiful, absolutely massive old world style piece of architecture, one that doesn't seem to have anything that would reveal that it was being built by unskilled labor, we're told that this was built essentially by indentured servants and soldiers that had no history in architecture or construction. It's absolutely fascinating again, because it doesn't make a lot of sense to find something so beautiful, so meticulously well crafted, something that was headed by a team of only 10 architects with one main architect being Anca, only 28 years old, who had never designed another piece of architecture before. Just look into the different things within this narrative, because to me, as an educated mind, again, I'm not saying I'm a master of anything, and I certainly don't know exactly how the palace of parliament was founded. But what I do know is that the narrative doesn't exactly add up. In the official reports from Romanian sources, we are told only 27 workers passed away due to different injuries that occurred in the construction of the palace of parliament. However, again, referring to firsthand accounts, Romanian accounts from workers who were there said to be working on the project at this time, we're told at least 1000 workers may have passed away as a result of this construction project, and that would be more than one worker per week. Now, the palace of parliament was constructed originally under the order of the Communist Party that was the ruling regime of Romania. However, after the Communist Party in Romania fell, the government that took over still chose to continue construction of the palace of parliament, even knowing that it would be one of the most expensive buildings in the history of mankind, a building that still has Romania in debt. Now, why I bring that up and why I think the construction of the palace of parliament is shrouded in so much mystery, but was allowed to continue after the fall was because of the hidden purposes, the underlying or ulterior motives that went behind the construction of this immaculate and massive palace. I believe there was a hidden ulterior purpose or maybe multiple different purposes that went into this construction. Lots of people like to talk about the different underground bunkers, underground railways, underground tunnel systems. For example, we have a rather large structure. Again, the above ground architecture is absolutely beautiful. Old world and style, immense, fascinating. But what's underground is even more fascinating. We're told the palace of parliament has at least eight known underground levels, meaning there's at least eight stories beneath the surface of the earth that this palace continues to, and those are only the levels that are known to the public. Within this palace, there are over 1,100 unique rooms and only 400 of them or less are in use today. Many of them are in private sectors, sections that are off limits to any sort of public person, and many government officials also don't have full access to this building. Over 12 miles of underground tunnels lead out of Bucharest from within the basement of the palace of parliament, and these underground tunnels contain underground railways leading to other major sections of Romania. The volume of the palace of parliament is the only building on our planet that exceeds the volume of the Great Pyramid of Giza, and we're also told that the palace of parliament is so massive, so heavy, that the entire building sinks into the earth over one fourth of an inch every single year. Now, that is all fine and dandy, and again, I have so many facts that I wrote down here about this palace of parliament, but again, these are all just really the current narrative. So, if we're going to believe the current narrative, then really what is the point in looking into the different alternate perspectives? Because what I want to do on my channel is to make you think, and to make you think is to question everything that we've been told. And when we're looking at a building that's only 40 years old or less, yet we have no real construction photographs of it, and the history is really more of an anomaly than any sort of conducive narrative that brings us sort of closure, I would say. Maybe closure is not the right word, but you don't want to look at a building and then look at the narrative and say, that just doesn't add up. And now, the construction photograph aspect of this, and again, this is the main part that really stood out to me, that this whole thing might be a little bit of a jumbled piece of history, a piece of history that's meant to be sort of plausible deniability or something that at least was put into this narrative to make you not question things a little bit more. And yet, all of this was done before the real height of the internet, when people actually began to share their ideas and to understand that it's okay to question history. Because we are told the reason that we don't have construction photographs, not only because of the fall of communism in Romania, when a lot of the photographs, materials, things like that, they transferred hands. So we're told that many of the construction photographs, if they did exist, they went into private collections and they were destroyed, they were lost, they were misplaced, etc. Again, we have a similar narrative to that in many other historical outlines, timelines that we look into. But the real doozy here with the Palace of Parliament in Bucharest in Romania is that Anca Petruscu, this architect, the 28 year old that I told you about earlier, we are told that as soon as the building was completed, she sued the government of Romania. She sued the people who hired her to create the Palace of Parliament, stating that they could not use the image of the Palace of Parliament without her consent. So all of the construction photographs under this lawsuit that she put forth, and it appears that she won because, again, looking into the narrative, this is mentioned as the reason why we don't have photographs of the Palace of Parliament. So essentially, this architect, this 28 year old who created what was one of the largest buildings in the history of mankind, as soon as it was completed, she then went forth, again, having never created another building before, she went forth and sued the government of Romania, saying that they didn't have the rights to use the image of the building that she architected, that she designed. And that is the history. And we're told any photographs of the construction and really any photographs from the 1980s, the 1990s, when the building was not fully completed, those photographs are essentially not allowed to be shared because of Anca Petruscu essentially owning the rights to the image and the design of the Palace of Parliament. So this, the world's most expensive administrative building and the heaviest building in the world, nine billion pounds of building, all of this, at least the image of it, are all owned by the family of Anca Petruscu. And to this day, the Romanian government has yet to purchase back or to fully claim to own, to regain the rights to showcase this building. Does that make any sense to you? Honestly, does any of this make any sense to you? I mean, we can go through all of this history. And I do this with pretty much every location that we look at. But for one that was built, we're told in the 1980s, in the 1990s, literally it was completed after I was born. This building is not that old. And we're going to go in and we're going to say that there are not construction photographs to the point that a hundred thousand workers worked on this building. And yet not one of them was able to even sneak out a photograph to show us what this building looked like, the foundations, the underground layers, the different parts that were said to be interconnected to a larger underground network. And it also goes hand in hand with the changing of the regime, with the changing of the guard that happened in Romania after this building was founded. Yes, it wasn't completed yet, but we can only imagine that five years into the project, most of the underground parts of this building would have been completed. So isn't it ironic? Isn't it convenient that the regime would change at this time period and everyone that was associated with the earlier communist regime in Romania, many of them were essentially taken out in different ways. I'm not going to get too much into it, but they no longer were part of the project and they were no longer part of the country. And then the new regime that came in essentially continued the project, making sure that this massive building with its eight underground layers or more, eight underground levels, eight underground passages, I guess, to different parts of the country, different parts of the world, knowing that we have interconnected railway systems and other things like that. We can only imagine truly what exists underground in Romania, what has existed here for hundreds, if not thousands of years, going back to when this location was part of Uranus Hill. And when we look into this history, even for those who do not believe that the old world was as spectacular or any different than what the history books tell us, when you look at a building like this that's only 40 years old and we don't have a true history to it, at least one that we can literally put our hands on and see in front of us, does that not make you begin to question everything you know about the history of mankind? you