TT Trump Và Putin Đều Biết Tập Đã Xong Đời, Lãnh Đạo Huawei Xin Mỹ Tha Cho Trung Quốc

Khán Thế Giới
85 followers
Nội Dung Chính:
0:12 TỔNG BÍ THƯ BÓNG TỐI XUẤT HIỆN
1:23 TỪ NGOẠI GIAO CHIẾN LANG ĐẾN CON CỪU VÔ TỘI
3:04 TRẬN ĐỊA KINH TẾ – TT TRUMP ĐÁNH MỘT ĐÒN, BẮC KINH LÙI MỘT BƯỚC
5:31 KHÔNG PHẢI NHẬM CHÍNH PHI ĐANG CỨU HUAWEI – MÀ LÀ ĐCSTQ ĐANG GIỮ LẤY ẢO ẢNH QUYỀN LỰC
8:04 THOÁI LUI CÓ TÍNH TOÁN – HUAWEI KHÔNG PHẢI MỤC TIÊU, MÀ LÀ PHƯƠNG TIỆN
10:15 HUYỀN THOẠI TAN VỠ – KHI MỘT BIỂU TƯỢNG BỊ HỆ THỐNG TỰ TAY HẠ BỆ
11:16 HUAWEI TỪ BIỂU TƯỢNG CHỐNG PHONG TỎA ĐẾN KẺ XIN “THA MẠNG”
12:25 THỜI TẬP CẬN BÌNH ĐÃ KHÉP LẠI
14:23 “TỔNG BÍ THƯ TRONG BÓNG TỐI” ĐÃ THỰC SỰ BIẾN MẤT
-------------
Cảm ơn quý vị đã theo dõi và ủng hộ chương trình. Nếu yêu mến kênh đừng quên đăng ký để đón xem nhiều bản tin hấp dẫn hơn
#tin tuc # tin the giới # chien tranh
Huawei suddenly lowered its voice to ask for President Trump's forgiveness.
Xi Jinping disappeared from the press.
The Chinese husband is replacing the driver.
Please follow the full analysis of the letter in the envelope
and a re-designated system of power.
The letter in the envelope appears.
Ladies and gentlemen, do you know in this world
what are the most fearful dictators?
Yes, they are most afraid when others say you have no power anymore.
And that's the story of the Chinese Communist Party's President,
and his close ally, Xi Jinping.
Recently, Xi Jinping suddenly reappeared on the front page of the press.
But this time, not to speak, not to test,
nor to host a conference,
but to ask others to speak for themselves.
Who is asked? It is Xi Jinping.
Specifically, the People's Daily today
posted an interview with Xi Jinping,
the founder of Huawei.
In the article, Xi Jinping said that Huawei is actually not that bad.
He sent a message to the US government that
don't be too tense because we are behind a generation
Do you find it strange?
In the past, the words of national humiliation,
humiliating oneself in front of the West
could be invited to drink tea by Chinese Communist Party employees.
But now, not only those words are spoken,
but also put on the front page of the official newspaper.
And not only that,
this interview was also put under the theme of
The more the country opens its doors, the more we progress.
I see this theme, but it's funny.
Why? Let's compare.
From the diplomatic war to the innocent election.
Why do I find it funny?
Because just a day ago,
US President Donald Trump just stood in the White House
and said in front of the press that
we want to open the door to China.
President Trump called for China to open the door
and just the next day,
the People's Daily of China immediately printed the big words
The more the country opens its doors,
the more we progress. Right on the front page.
This situation is exactly like the Chinese Foreign Ministry
has not yet received an official notice.
Huawei has quickly sent a letter to the public
to answer Mr. Trump.
So is this a press interview?
Or is it a pledge of allegiance of the Chinese Communist Party to the United States?
Or more accurately,
is it a letter of apology to President Trump
just to get a non-signature certificate?
Because if people know this is the intention of the CPC,
it will be too embarrassing.
So they pushed a state-loving businessman
out to be a spokesman.
However, in another war,
Belarusian media suddenly reported that
the daughter of President Xi Jinping,
Xi Jinping,
the long-hidden daughter
who used to study at Harvard,
suddenly appeared in a family dinner
to welcome Belarusian President Lukashenko.
Think about it.
On one side, Xi Jinping said,
we are not as skillful as others.
On the other side,
Nixon appeared to say,
my father is still in the position,
still an international guest.
Or is it a soft, hard,
technical talk,
a demonstration of a family unity,
like a political struggle,
a fusion of domestic and foreign propaganda?
And we, the observers,
only know how to look at each other.
Is this Huawei saving itself?
Or is the entire Chinese system
borrowing from Huawei
to keep a political illusion?
What is that illusion?
It is the letter in the envelope
of a person who has fallen out of the center of power
but is still strongly protected by the propaganda system.
In the economic battleground,
President Trump took a hit,
and Beijing took a step back.
Also on June 10,
at the center of London,
specifically Lancaster Hall,
a 19th-century Rochelle-style building
used to be a place where British nobles held parties.
Now it has become a temporary battlefield
between the two largest economies in the world.
The U.S. and China,
the U.S. delegation arrived at 10.30 a.m.
The entire delegation was busy,
and their faces were tense.
The leader was Scott Besson,
the finance minister,
in charge of negotiations,
economic affairs, and taxation.
Next to him was Horvath Sloanick,
the trade minister,
who implemented export control measures.
And there was no shortage of Jameson Crear,
a former trade representative,
who was responsible for legal and dispute resolution.
This trio was called
the Chinese dictatorship of the Trump administration.
Although President Trump did not directly participate,
it was clear that he was controlling from afar.
Before the U.S. delegation arrived,
he said at the White House,
we need to open the door to China,
but maybe we don't need to do anything.
That sentence sounds light,
but it means a lot.
We just have to stand and watch.
People will have to open the door themselves.
President Trump clearly understood
that Beijing was preparing to show a new attitude,
and this time he seemed to hold the win.
Because for many months,
when facing the pressure of President Trump,
China did not choose to confront,
as in previous years.
They did not argue,
did not argue,
did not talk about autonomous technology
or high-quality development.
Instead, they put Xi Jinping on the People's Daily
to speak softly.
But don't get the wrong idea.
In the past, Xi Jinping has never been given this role.
Because if Mr. Xi admits that Huawei is weak,
it will hit the national pride
that Huawei is a symbol.
Huawei is still the domain
of those who love extremist countries.
It is the battlefield of the fans of the network.
But this time,
the center of the negotiation
lies in rare earths and semiconductors.
The US wants China to take over rare earths.
China wants the US to be soft
in controlling semiconductors.
President Trump made a clear statement
that there is no need to do anything.
China also has to open the door.
This is an allusion
that the internal leadership system of China has changed.
The media strategy has also changed.
The US side issued a signal
that if China takes over rare earths,
the US can consider,
just consider,
not promise,
to take over control
From now on,
China only has two actions to do.
Smile and show respect.
Push the representative of the people to speak.
The People's Daily immediately posted an interview
with Xi Jinping,
saying that Huawei is not dangerous.
The technology was too much blown by the US.
It's not Xi Jinping who is saving Huawei,
but the Communist Party of China
is trying to take power.
The question is,
does Xi Jinping voluntarily speak
such words,
or is this an arrangement from above?
The answer lies in the place
where the interview was posted,
the front page of the People's Daily.
It must be known that
this is a national political forum,
where only events such as the National Assembly,
the speech of the Vice President,
the Prime Minister,
or grand anniversaries such as the founding of the Party.
Even businessmen who have had a national impact
such as Li Shaocheng
have not been brought up here.
So on June 10,
Xi Jinping was placed
on the front page of the interview.
On the right, there is a big headline,
The more the country opens,
the more we progress.
There is no image, only words,
but it is highlighted
among a series of policy headlines.
The content of the interview
is thought to be a technical explanation
that Huawei is still a generation behind,
that the computing system
has to use algorithms
to compensate for the lack of chips,
that it is still trying to study the basics.
But if you look at the time
of the political environment,
the position of the post,
it is clear that Xi Jinping
did not say this himself,
but was asked to say it.
And the person who asked him to say
that the ministry is still in control
of the media of the Communist Party of China.
Why do you have to borrow
the voice of Xi Jinping?
Because the party is not convenient
to say weak words.
A politician who says
words that we are worse than the US,
it is a political humiliation.
But if you are a businessman,
that word becomes a manifestation
of the spirit of science,
logic, reality.
It should be emphasized that
the time of the headline is very unusual.
Because just a day earlier,
President Donald Trump said,
we want to open the door to China.
The next day,
the People's Daily published the headline,
the more the country opens the door,
the more we progress.
It will be so overwhelming
that people will be surprised.
Is Trump living in the South China Sea?
But why is it so harmonious?
Not all of the interview
did not mention the Communist Party of China.
There is no name of Xi,
there is no word of President Biden.
Only at the end of the article
did he pour rice into a sentence
according to the formula,
under the leadership of the party.
This sentence is no different
from signing the name at the end of the article
in order to read it out loud.
Clearly, this is not an accident.
This is an attempt to
denigrate and denigrate foreign speech.
Because the authorities of Beijing understand that
if they continue to use the tone of the party
to command everything
to talk to Trump,
there is no way to negotiate.
The Trump side has soon separated
between China and China
in the official political language of the United States.
So this time,
they changed faces, changed people, changed air.
They did not allow the Politburo to appear,
instead, they took the face of China
as a new mask of the system.
Back to the calculation,
Huawei is not a target, but a vehicle.
In the entire interview,
Mr. Nham Chin Phi admitted,
the US has expanded Huawei's technology capabilities.
We are a generation behind.
We have to use mathematics
to compensate for the lack of physics.
We have to use collective computing
to make up for the lack of wafer technology.
It sounds like a weak self-confession,
but in fact,
this is an extremely smart law
of propaganda politics.
It proves itself harmless,
but still has the ability to cooperate.
Because just before that,
the Trump administration
just announced a new round of sanctions,
which stipulates that any business
that uses a Chinese chip
even if it only operates locally,
can also be investigated
under the US Export Control Act.
In other words,
Huawei is no longer just a Chinese business,
but has become a nuclear launch pad
in the global supply chain.
Whoever touches it,
that person can also be smashed.
In that situation,
Mr. Nham was forced to speak out,
saying that Huawei is not that dangerous,
but at the same time,
it cannot overestimate itself,
because if it does,
it will lose all credibility.
So he was both low-key
and self-confident.
Although a generation has passed,
we still have a place
in the system solution.
This is the art of modesty
but not surrender.
And if you think that
Mr. Nham is talking about Huawei,
then you have been misled.
He is replacing the Chinese political system
to tell the Trump administration that
we are not as strong as you think,
don't put us on the wall.
We have changed people,
we have changed voices,
please give us a new chance.
In fact, this interview
is not to save Huawei.
It is the signal of negotiation
that the Chinese political system
sends to the Trump administration.
That signal has two layers of meaning.
We no longer cling to opposing ideas,
no longer speak beyond the West,
no longer lead the world,
no longer be self-sufficient.
Instead, let a businessman speak softly,
create opportunities for both sides.
We are no longer the Chinese
during the time of Xi Jinping.
We represent China in the next generation,
no longer stick to the old tough policy,
and the speakers today
are no longer central or foreign ministers,
but the face of a businessman
who knows how to speak softly.
But the biggest problem is
whether Trump believes it or not.
Unfortunately, Trump does not need anyone
to change the speakers,
he wants to change the rules.
The legend is broken
when a symbol is subdued by the system.
What Trump advises is not
the individual to take the lead,
but the military-civilian strategy
that the Chinese Communist Party
has maintained for many years.
If Huawei wants to be seen as harmless,
the US side will ask
Do you dare to separate Huawei
from the military system?
Do you dare to publicly open
the operating network
and keep the data hidden?
The answer is clear,
the system does not dare.
So what the interviewee really wants to protect
is not Huawei,
but an image that can be discussed
as a temporary, easy-to-use symbol
enough to keep China
on the negotiating table with the US.
Remember the past 10 years
in China's propaganda system,
which words are repeated the most?
Lead, leave.
From the satellite system,
to the Hongmong software,
to the chipset,
to the domestic power supply,
all lead to the US.
Every time the lead slogan is raised,
the entire system is excited,
and the people believe.
And the peak of the lead to the far
was in 2023,
in the launch of Huawei Mate 60 phone.
Huawei from the anti-lockdown symbol
to the death penalty.
In 2023,
Huawei has done something
that no one can imagine.
In the context of the US,
TSMC and ASML
a series of bans,
Huawei suddenly launched a phone model
claimed to be an anti-lockdown,
Huawei Mate 60.
The phone was as big as that.
When it launched,
it became a political symbol.
The state media was shocked.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
shouted,
the media flooded the social network.
The entire TSMC was mobilized
to a slogan,
we can still lead the world
by internal force.
Huawei was no longer a company
but had become an anti-Western
a symbol of technology
Both the party and the military
and the people together
raised a flag.
So only two years later,
the founder of Huawei
on the same page
said again,
we are not as strong as the symbols.
The US has overestimated
our ability.
We are still training internally,
and far from it.
You see,
this is not self-determination,
but the commitment of a tragedy.
A symbol once placed on the altar,
now it is in the hands of the system
to lower its value
in exchange for the next existence.
The time of Xi Jinping has come to an end.
The change in the interview
of the US administration
is not just the story of Huawei.
It is a sign of a complete change
in China's foreign propaganda strategy.
From we broke the chain,
now we are still far from it.
From the West was afraid we would overcome,
now the West has overestimated us.
After a tough process,
each word, each line
was carefully selected
and reported to the people.
The highest public opinion agency
reported that the interview
was no longer a representative
of the US administration,
but a representative of the entire
foreign media chain
of the Chinese political system.
It is evidence that the propaganda machine
is taking a step back.
Not only Huawei,
but also the fighting language system
has temporarily shut down.
A force is silently erasing
the traces of the language of the time.
Why?
Because the word
leading to far away
has become a double-edged sword,
rising up on its own,
making the enemy calm,
and making the US fall
into a state of absolute disapproval.
The Chinese propaganda system
thought that
just saying
leading to far away
could stimulate the public,
but unexpectedly
defeated the enemy.
Until the enemy was about to fall,
and the enemy itself
was not as strong as it had been said.
The system had just begun
to absorb the consequences
of human death
of self-promotion.
Huawei's move
this time
is not a change
of technological strategy,
but a change
of way of talking to the West.
This is not a surrender,
but a kind of
continued deception
in the role of new people.
The system is saying
that
President Trump
can be soft-hearted
if the situation changes.
The US quickly forgets.
The financial market
still wants to make money.
If only Trump
gave a little hand,
they would quickly
re-launch on the global
technology stage,
continue to be waffers,
train AI models,
develop algorithms,
sneak away from the bottom,
and finally
put together
the double-edged sword
leading to far away
that had been cut off.
Xi Jinping is not
speaking personally,
but he is the new face
of the system,
the new mask
that the system
uses
to change clothes.
And behind
that mask
is who?
Tung Bich Thu
in the dark
has really disappeared.
Two days ago,
when Xi Jinping
appeared
on People's Daily,
Belarusian media
suddenly reported
on the Chinese visit
of President Lukashenko,
Xi Jinping
organized a family party,
and especially
his daughter
Xi Jinping
appeared
for the first time
in front of a foreign player.
It sounds warm,
but if you look closely,
this is an extremely
dramatic scene.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry
announced
that the meeting
would take place
in the morning.
State media
such as CCTV
did not report
about the dinner.
Lukashenko
left Beijing
in the afternoon.
So when did
that dinner happen?
Who took the picture?
Why is there
no news in the country
but was announced
by Belarus
three days later?
This is not news.
This is a dramatic
play
to create an illusion
that Xi Jinping
is still in power.
His family
is still united
and supportive.
External affairs
still happen
as usual.
In fact,
Xi Jinping
is no longer in power.
The source
from a Russian intelligence
fund called
SVR General
posted a report
said that
Xi Jinping
had a heart attack
on the night
of May 25-26.
After that,
his condition
deteriorated twice
in early June.
Some senior leaders
began to plan
to transfer power,
form a new group,
implement policies
and propaganda.
According to the intelligence,
this is not
social media news,
but a report
At the same time,
President Trump
was reluctant.
Perhaps we don't
need to do anything,
they will have to
open the door.
That is not
too much confidence,
but it is certain
that the other party
has changed people,
the system has changed.
The time of Xi Jinping
has ended,
but it did not end
with a coup,
but ended
with a simple thing.
When the people
no longer mentioned
his name,
when the enemy
did not want to
negotiate with him,
it was when Xi Jinping
really disappeared,
not from a legal position,
but from the center
of power
and political meaning.
