牛奶 豆奶是最有營養的非牛奶嗎?

格雷格医生專欄
23粉絲
371 次觀看·2025年10月13日
現今有許多新的選擇 從橄欖到藕
讓大量的農業公司失業
但是一系列建議 關於健康的飲食選擇
從12到24歲的年齡層
強調這些植物製的牛奶
並非適當的營養補充物
除了鋁牛奶
報告和媒體報導
馬上引起許多民間醫學家的爭議
包括關於利益衝突的問題
因為許多這些支持的組織
從農業行業獲得資金
但有一個組織被指控
嘗試掩蓋這個事實
從報告釋出後
立即取消了
國家農業委員會的贊助清單
但是報告的價值是什麼呢?
畢竟鋁牛奶無論如何都不需要
並不應該被依賴
作為主要的營養源
孩子們可以吃水和健康的食物
如果要給孩子牛奶
應該會有更好的選擇
雖然鋁牛奶含有豐富的酵素
但並不明顯地減少腫瘤
而大多數種植物製牛奶市場上
都有相同的數量
更重要的是
鋁牛奶的消耗帶來的風險
包括可能涉及
一種疾病發作
嬰兒精神疾病
酮素不適
鋁牛奶蛋白疾病
和嬰兒咳嗽
我們有很多視頻
關於這些話題
因此
正常的牛奶消耗
必須與植物製牛奶的風險相比
這些牛奶主要是
使用不適
意味著
除了大多數其他食物
其他食物的不適
例如亞利桑那和亞利桑那
因為這個飲食
基本上是99%的牛奶
植物製牛奶
優勢在於
植物製牛奶
據說比脂肪更豐富
這是技術上的事
因為牛奶沒有脂肪
但是植物製牛奶的脂肪含量
是相當可憐的
當然
對於整個食物相比
從哪裏來的
我意思是
幾顆玉米
它們自己
會有超過10克
但是
仍然
牛奶
可能是
所有植物製牛奶中
基本上
它只是浸泡
磨損
煮熟
和排泄
並被說是
唯一的非牛奶
它含有
相同量的蛋白質
和牛奶
這可能曾經是事實
但現在
有牛奶
也相對
蛋白質
它們都
通常含有
相同的
酵素和維他命D等
和少量卡路里
其實
牛奶
5倍
少量卡路里
的卡路里
植物製牛奶
還有
減少
肚子癌的風險
在女性
和正常化
發展
植物製牛奶
也涉及
肚子癌風險
在男性
一項進行研究
建議
增強肚子健康
通過增強
好的細菌增長
牛奶
含有
抗氧化作用
減少
蛋白質
蛋白
牛奶可以幫助腹部治療
提高步行速
運動力
支撐力
肌肉功能
以及
低血壓
在男性和女性
比牛奶好
不僅
降低你的血糖酵素
25%
只要21天
很明顯
在飲食方面
牛奶
是人類食物中
最好的代替
代替牛奶的方式
是的
有各種
植物製
和植物製牛奶的
毛主席
今天
大家
這對
全球的
食物製食
脂肪
食物製製脂肪
脂肪
失效
脂肪
你不能
贏得
脂肪
你不可能贏得脂肪
你不能贏得脂肪
about whether they are beneficial
because of the various so-called
anti-nutrient compounds they contain.
It's true there are some compounds
when eaten in high enough quantities,
especially when taken in isolation,
can have adverse effects.
Whole plant foods also contain thousands
of other compounds in the food matrix though,
many of which counteract the potential effects
of the anti-nutrients.
Plant-based diets are associated
with a reduced risk of lifestyle-induced chronic diseases.
The thousands of phytonutrients they contain
promote antioxidant defense, for example,
reduce inflammation.
In some cases, what has been referred to
as anti-nutrients may, in fact,
be therapeutic agents for various conditions.
See, for example, my video series
on the role of phytates
in the prevention and treatment of cancer.
I don't want to end without emphasizing
one of the plant-based pros, no lactose.
People don't understand that the majority
of adult humans on planet Earth
are unable to digest cow's milk.
Throughout childhood, the enzyme you have
that breaks down the milk sugar lactose
begins to decline in most individuals
throughout the world,
which makes sense since milk is for babies.
Why would we need to digest it
after weaning from the breast?
And so, most people experience symptoms
like bloating, abdominal pain, intestinal gas,
and watery stool, or even nausea and vomiting.
The global prevalence estimate
of lactose malabsorption is more than
two out of three people,
and the United States is more like
one out of three, but 95% of Asians,
60-80% of African Americans,
and Ashkenazi Jews,
80-100% of American Indians,
and 50-80% of Hispanics
have trouble digesting milk.
It's really mostly those
of Northern European origin
who can handle it throughout adulthood.
So, to say everyone should drink milk
seems like an example of racial bias
in federal nutrition policy.
It's like they're assuming everyone
is of Northern European descent.
Overall, about 75%
of the world's population,
including 25% of those
in the United States,
lose their lactase enzymes after weaning.
To fight the vitamin D disease rickets,
they had to choose something
in the food supply to fortify
with vitamin D.
Choosing dairy is ironic
since individuals of African ancestry,
because of their darker skin,
are at particularly high risk
for vitamin D deficiency,
yet most can't properly digest it.
But there is some good news.
For reasons like these,
Canada has recently removed dairy
as a separate food group
in their national dietary guidance.
In 2019, the new Canada's
Dietary Guidelines and Food Guide
were released,
having undergone a thorough review
and update to emphasize
the importance of consuming
more plant-based products.
Another major change
was the removal of dairy
as a separate food group with,
wait for it, water included
as the beverage of choice.
What a concept.
The attenuated emphasis
on dairy products
and the increased focus
on plant-based foods in Canada
were based on several parameters,
including the removal
of industry-funded studies
from consideration
as part of the evidence base.
