Why Should You Go to Church? | Jordan Peterson

CHRISTIANITY • Beliefs • Life
1 follower
7 Video Views·Dec 30, 2024
Why does church still matter in the modern world? In this thought-provoking talk, Jordan Peterson explores the deeper meaning and importance of attending church and participating in a faith community.
Drawing on psychology, philosophy, and biblical themes, Peterson discusses how church traditions, stories, and moral teachings have shaped Western culture and individual character for centuries. He reflects on the role of church in providing structure, meaning, community, and a shared framework for understanding responsibility, suffering, and purpose.
This discussion invites viewers to consider why religious gatherings have endured throughout history and what value they may still hold for individuals and society today.
Why do people go to church? Because that's what's going on.
Why should they? Because that's a discussion. So Jonathan took me to an Orthodox
ceremony in Seattle, and like I wasn't into it. I found it, it grated on me.
You're like a 10-year-old boy that we're telling to stop moving.
Yeah, yeah, that's right. So that was my Freudian fixation. It's like,
you're a 10. Stop wiggling.
Yeah, yeah, stop wiggling. No kidding. No kidding. But, you know, there's been a lot of water under
the bridge since then, man. And I went to an Orthodox mass here a couple of weeks ago,
and I found it unbelievable. And a Catholic one a week before that. I was down at
Franciscan University, and I found it unbelievably soothing, which was very
much unlike the reactions I've had before. And that was partly, well, for complicated reasons,
because I actually find any place that isn't a bloody nightmarish catastrophe soothing now.
I mean that, man. But there was more to it than that, too. It was because I also did develop,
and partly as a consequence of our discussions, a deeper appreciation for
what was happening in the ritual itself. And also more tolerance for whatever inadequacies I might
perceive, you know. And partly that's also realization. You know, lots of modern people say,
well, I don't go to church because I don't believe that. It's like,
well, A, who cares what you believe? Like, who the hell are you anyways?
And why do you even care what you believe? And how's that working for you, this belief
set that you theoretically have? How sophisticated is that? Are you Plato or what? It's like, well,
here's the church, and here's me, and I'm right. It's like, well, no, you're not. And first,
and second, you don't even want to be, because that's a great place to be. Like, pinnacle of
brilliant wisdom. It's completely solipsistic. No tradition for me, thank you very much. You
know, I've got it all right in my head. And even if you are right that the bloody institution is
chaotic and decadent in some fundamental sense, it's like, well, good. There's something for
you to do. Like, there always has been throughout the entire history of mankind, because that's
the once great king who's fallen into disrepair. It's like, well, if the church is broken,
and you're the genius to see it, why do you go fix it? Well, then you might say, well,
we'll just abandon it. It's like, okay, well, fine. You're going to get rid of that, A. You're
going to get rid of marriage. You're going to get rid of funerals. You're going to get rid of
Christmas. You're going to get rid of any sense of sacred time. You're going to dispense with the
whole history of what Judeo-Christian thought. You're going to dispense with the idea of the
sacred nature of the individual. Like, how far are you willing to go with this? And believe me,
that question is right in front of you, because there's a wave of radicals who are asking you
at every moment, what makes you so sure that there's a difference between a man and a woman?
No, there isn't. Or the yes, there is when we want there to be, and no, there isn't when we don't
want there to be. You saw that with the Supreme Court appointment. It's like, we have to have a
woman, but there's no such thing as a woman. It's like, and so, yeah, you Frenchmen, you know,
you've abandoned your Catholicism. You think the Catholics, they were crazy. It's like,
you ain't seen nothing yet. And so I believe, and Jung kind of convinced me of that. He
more or less posited, and you could say the same thing about Orthodoxy. He said,
Catholic is as sane as people ever get. And that's partly because we have to have one foot in the
dream and the mystery. We have to. You know, when I heard Douglas Murray speak recently about this,
that was very interesting, because Murray is an atheist, essentially, and he has a variety of
reasons for that. But he has swung around hard recently, and he said, when he was talking to
Dave Rubin, he said, I don't believe that either conservatism or classic liberalism can survive
in the absence of the religious surround, which was really something for him to admit.
And it's taken him like five years of thinking to come to that conclusion. But then he said
something even more remarkable, I thought, and he said, and it's actually the mysterious part of it
that has to be retained. The virgin birth, the resurrection, the crucifixion, all of that crazy
mythology, let's say, because otherwise it just degenerates into another form of cheap social
justice. And like, don't we have enough of that? And I think that's, now, I don't know what to
make of that, because, well, and that's why we have discussion continually about the, what would
you say, well, the transcendent, I suppose, the miraculous, the transcendent, the idea of the
resurrection, for example, and all of that. It's like, well, what do you do with that? And the
answer is, we don't know, but we don't throw it out without having some sense of what's going to
come in to replace it. And we're seeing that now. You know, look at us, we're so confused,
wonder the Russians are at war with us. It's like, we're not having anything to do with those people.
They simultaneously proclaim that a woman is absolutely necessary for the highest position
in the land, or one of them, and that the same person says, well, I don't even know what a woman
is. It's like, well, are those people insane? It's like, clearly, clearly, that's just way too far,
right? When I talk to my Democrat friends, I say, look, you can have one of those.
You know, there's either no distinction between a man and a woman,
or it's important that a woman's on the Supreme Court, but there's no bloody way I'm giving you
both. So, because I don't even know how to do that. I have no idea how to do that. Like,
what am I supposed to do? Celebrate womanhood, and simultaneously celebrate the fact that the
differences between men and women are so trivial that they're irrelevant, and they can be changed
at will. That is insane. It violates the law of non-contradiction. And so, there's no, that's,
you think religious people are crazy.
