Flintlock Muskets & Rifles in 18th Century America

Battlefield Firearms
3 followers
6 Video Views·Sep 23, 2024
This is an original documentary on the development and use of flintlock muskets and rifles by both the Continental Army and colonial militias during the American Revolutionary War, in their fight against the British Redcoat forces.
After the French and Indian War, relations between the North American British colonies
and the British Parliament grew more and more strained.
Parliament sought to demonstrate and enforce its authority over the colonies,
and to recoup the cost of the war through taxes on their activities.
The colonies, particularly New England,
felt more and more frustrated by the loss of local control over local affairs.
Many colonialists began to see armed conflict as inevitable,
and started stockpiling arms and ammunition.
One important stockpile of weapons had been gathered by the militia in Concord, Massachusetts.
This powder keg would soon explode into a war for independence from British rule,
and for the colonialists to become Americans, they would need the power of the American gun.
To defend the colonies against external threats, including pirates,
but more often hostile native tribes, governors established local militias.
Every able-bodied male was expected to serve in the militia,
and every home was expected to have at least one working firearm.
The militias drilled in tactics such as volley fire and quick response to emergency bells.
They built solid defenses around each village and kept their powder dry.
But in contrast to professional armies, the militias were loosely structured,
and generally only met a few days a year to drill.
The militia were required to provide their own weapons.
Often these were fouling pieces.
These were popular for their versatility,
able to fire a single large ball or a handful of shot for hunting waterfowl.
English colonies struggled in their relations with the native populations.
Though these were friendly relations at times, there were also periods of conflict.
During a conflict known as King Philip's War,
New England colonists and their own Native American allies
battled against a confederation of other native tribes.
In that war, a colonialist named Benjamin Church
emerged to form a company of colonialists and allied natives.
Church learned the natives' tactics for moving through the forests and swamps undetected
and fighting a more guerrilla style than was known to Europeans.
These were the first American ranger forces,
and Benjamin Church is considered the father of American ranging.
These skills proved valuable, for the conflicts did not end
when one of Church's native allies killed the so-called King Philip, a native chieftain.
From the late 1600s, almost up to the American Revolution,
there were a series of wars between English colonials and French colonials,
each having their own allies among the Native American tribes.
The most famous is the last one,
known in America simply as the French and Indian War, ending in 1763.
But there were others, with Europeans and natives alike
wielding muskets in their struggle for control of the new world.
Within the broad categories of matchlocks, wheel locks, and flintlocks,
there was a wide variety of gun designs,
wheel lock dueling pistols,
and, like any art, gunsmithing drew its artists.
Guns made for nobility might include beautifully carved gold or silver designs.
One well-known style of gun was the blunderbuss.
This might be a shorter musket or a pistol,
marked by the flared muzzle at the end of its short steel or brass barrel.
The broad opening at the top made loading the powder and shot easier and faster,
and the blunderbuss could be devastating at short range,
usually firing a handful of lead shot.
The blunderbuss is strongly associated with the pilgrims in American minds,
though those early colonists made use of other firearms as well.
The 75 caliber flintlock musket, known as the Brown Bess,
was the standard for British soldiers through 18th and early 19th centuries.
The Brown Bess musket is English in origin,
and this is based on the muskets they developed in the early 18th century,
roughly around 1722,
and these muskets are what won the English their empire around the world.
These muskets are all roughly around 75 caliber smoothbore muskets,
and they use a flintlock as the system of ignition.
And this particular example is a copy of the Shortland pattern musket
that was developed just prior to the American Revolution.
This example has the mark Tower on the lock plate,
indicating that it had been inspected in the Tower of London.
These things were battle winners in their time.
They are smoothbore and inherently inaccurate.
They're only accurate out to about 50 to 75 yards.
Anything greater than that, the accuracy really drops off quite a bit.
This thing is quite simply loaded.
A soldier would take a cartridge from his cartridge pouch,
normally worn at the waist or from a broad sling on their right hip.
They would draw a cartridge from their pouch,
bring it to their mouth, tear it open,
pour a little bit within the pan,
shut the pan,
pour the remainder of the gunpowder down the barrel.
They would draw out this long iron ramrod
and ram the whole cartridge down with a tamp
and return the rammer to the pipes just underneath of the barrel.
Then the soldier was ready to fire.
A good soldier was supposed to be able to fire three shots in a minute.
I know I've seen people that can get
between four and five shots in a minute with one of these is really quite a feat.
The comparable gun among the French was the Charleville musket,
a 69 caliber smoothbore musket.
These muskets were standard issue for French infantry after 1717.
Named for the armory in the Charleville-Mézières, Ardennes, France,
the Charleville, like the Brown Bess and other smoothbore muskets,
was accurate to around 50 to 100 yards.
The 1717 Charleville had a pinned barrel like the Brown Bess,
but the 1728 model would have three barrel bands instead.
This was easier to disassemble and clean and was a stronger design for bayonet combat.
The gun was about 60 inches long and about nine pounds.
The Charleville and Brown Bess were sturdy dependable flintlocks,
perfect for their intended purpose.
The goal was not individual accuracy.
When the armies of Europe met on the field,
they gathered into formation and fired volley after volley
of heavy lead balls into the opposing forces.
The soldiers could load and fire roughly three shots per minute.
As the smoke from the black powder made it difficult to see,
even within the limited range of their guns,
they did not place a high value on marksmanship.
Once their shot was spent, the soldiers would affix bayonets.
With bayonets attached, the long guns were effective pikes for use against cavalry
and could be deadly hand-to-hand weapons as well.
The Charleville and Brown Bess, like most firearms of that day,
were smooth bore muskets.
It had been known for some time that a rifled barrel could fire a bullet further
and more accurately.
A rifled barrel has a pattern of twisting grooves
which gives the projectile a spin as it leaves the barrel.
That spin gives the bullet stability.
But rifled barrels were more prone to fouling
by the black powder used during that period.
Also, for a bullet to take advantage of the rifling,
it would need to fit tightly into the barrel.
This made loading more difficult.
Smooth bore guns like the Brown Bess and Charleville
could be reloaded more quickly
and military tactics at the time did not require
the range or accuracy afforded by rifles.
But hunters could appreciate both of these characteristics.
In America, in the mid-18th century,
rifles were being made by smiths in Virginia and Pennsylvania.
Though fouling pieces and European-styled smooth bores
were popular and common,
the rifles were the truly American-made guns.
The American long rifles were developed
by gunsmiths of German ancestry.
On the frontier, a hunter's powder and shot
were in short supply.
Whereas European armies needed to load and fire
as quickly as possible
without regard for an individual's accuracy,
the frontier hunter needed to hit his target
on the first shot
or else see his family's dinner bound off into the woods
far faster than he could hope to reload.
The time would come when the ranger tactics
learned and developed by Benjamin Church
and the marksmanship of the American hunters
would be put to a different use.
Tensions between the American colonies
and the British government were growing.
Committees of safety were cropping up
all over the colonies,
taking control of the militias,
watching out for royal encroachment on colonial rights,
and eventually gathering arms for the coming conflict.
When I was a kid growing up
and reading about the causes of the American Revolution
in the history books in school,
I was under somewhat of a misguided notion
that the American Revolution began
because of a number of things
that had set the colonists off
against King George III.
Unreasonable taxes,
tax without representation,
the Boston Massacre,
the Boston Tea Party,
all these things had conspired
to ferment a level of unrest in New England,
and the American Minutemen
were called to bring out their squirrel rifles
after Paul Revere's ride
and meet at Lexington Green
and they started the American Revolution
on the morning of April 19th, 1775.
The thing that I found
through more research and study
is that it was far more involved and evolved than that.
The American Revolution had its seeds
going back to the French and Indian War
almost 20 years earlier,
certainly 10 years earlier
when things like the Boston Massacre occurred.
The colonials had a great stock of personal firearms
as they were used by just about everybody
for personal sustenance,
to be able to hunt with,
to provide meat on the dinner table.
For those living in an urban setting
such as Boston, Cambridge, New York City,
there were committees of safety
that had been established.
Those were basically local militia units
and at that time they weren't seen
as being used in the defense of the colonies
against the Crown of England,
but more for the mutual protection and defense
against whether it was the French
or still prevalent bands of Native Americans.
Not everybody had a rifled musket or long rifle,
but where committees of safety were established,
they had firearms that equaled or surpassed
the quality of the brown bests of the British infantry.
These were generally 69 or 75 caliber muskets,
smoothbores.
When Paul Revere did make his famous midnight ride
on the night of April 18th,
and alerted the countryside to the fact
that General Gage had sent yet another column
out into the countryside near Lexington and Concord,
he was alerting the minutemen
to come to their rally points.
This time, the reason for the marches outside of Boston
was different from all the other different marches
that the British troops had made
in the years leading up to that one morning.
This time, Gage's orders to Major Pitcairn
were clear and precise.
You will remove all stands of arms,
powder, shot, projectiles,
and artillery from the colonists
as you encounter them.
That was the line in the sand.
When Captain John Parker
assembled his 80 men on Lexington Green,
he told them,
do not fire unless fired upon.
If they mean to have a war,
let it begin here.
Throw down your arms and disperse,
you damned rebels.
Advance and disarm them.
Charge, bayonets.
Charge, all bayonets.
Fire, do not fire, do not fire.
And soon would come the shot heard round the world.
Patriots throughout the colonies
would put muskets to shoulder
and fight for their liberty.
A liberty that would be forged in battle,
achieved and defended by the American gun.
The most common guns of the American Revolution
were large caliber,
smoothbore, and flintlock muskets.
In the British Army,
the firearm of choice
was the British Army land pattern musket,
which is known by its nickname,
the Brown Bess.
This weapon was largely responsible
for winning the English their empire.
And this was very easy to make.
These things were all entirely handmade
within a certain specification.
They would make them all roughly to 75 caliber.
The Brown Bess musket,
this is an example of the short land pattern
used was used just prior to the revolution.
But the Brown Bess as a small arms design
dates from the early 18th century,
around the 1720s.
And these were used up till the 1830s roundabout
where they switched over to the percussion system
and the Enfield rifle musket.
Many of these old Brown Besses
had been used during the Napoleonic Wars,
although in a slightly updated version.
Many of the colonials in the militias
and in the Continental Army
would use the Brown Bess.
Another common musket among the patriots
was the French pattern musket
called the Charleville.
The Charleville had been used
by the French infantry for years.
The 1763 and 1766 models
were common in the colonies during the war,
purchased by the Congress
and secretly imported from France.
When the French entered the war,
their infantry were also carrying Charlevilles,
including the newly designed 1777 model.
The Americans also had guns
made right in the colonies.
Committees of safety were established in the colonies
to organize and equip their militias.
They ordered guns built by local gunsmiths
who frequently followed the design of the Brown Bess.
Congress would eventually establish
a Continental gun factory
in Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
where gunsmith William Henry
and his workmen produced arms for the revolution.
In addition to muskets and rifles,
military officers and some soldiers
also carried handguns
like the long guns.
They were all flintlocks.
They were deadly at close range,
but were inaccurate at any significant distance.
These large caliber smooth bore flintlocks
could fire a single large lead ball,
but they could also fire a handful of lead pellets
like a shotgun.
George Washington would later encourage his men
to load their muskets with a buck and ball.
This meant loading the gun
with one standard musket ball,
probably 69 caliber,
and three to six buckshot pellets.
This greatly increased the probability
of hitting one of the enemy
while maintaining the deadly power
of the large caliber gun.
With the smooth bore muskets
used by most of the troops,
it was all but impossible
to shoot with any real accuracy
over any significant distance,
making the buck and ball system
an attractive option.
But that wasn't true for rifles.
A rifled barrel has a pattern of twisting grooves
which gives the projectile a spin
as it leaves the barrel.
That spin gives the bullet stability,
allowing an accurate shot
over a greater distance.
But rifled barrels were more prone to fouling
by the black powder used during that period.
Also, for a bullet to take advantage
of the rifling,
it would need to fit tightly
into the barrel.
This made loading more difficult.
Smooth bore guns
like the Brown Bess and Charleville
could be reloaded more quickly,
and military tactics at the time
did not require the range
or accuracy afforded by rifles.
But hunters could appreciate
both of these characteristics.
And by the time of the American Revolution,
shooting competitions were held
for riflemen to demonstrate their prowess.
The American long rifle
is sometimes called the Kentucky rifle
due to a popular song
called The Hunters of Kentucky,
which lauded the heroics of frontiersmen
during the War of 1812.
But rifles were actually made
in most of the colonies,
and particularly in Pennsylvania,
Virginia, and the Carolinas.
They were originally designed
by German gunsmiths
who had immigrated to the colonies.
They redesigned the German Jaeger rifle,
lengthening the barrel to 44 inches
or even longer
to improve the gun's accuracy.
Rifles were the first
truly American-made firearm.
Smooth bore muskets
like the Brown Bess,
Charleville,
and the Committee of Safety guns
were still more common in New England.
Guns such as these,
along with powder and ammunition,
were stored by the Massachusetts militia
at Concord.
A provincial congress in Boston
had directed Massachusetts towns
to establish a rapid response militia,
men who could be called upon
to grab their guns
and go wherever they were needed
on a minute's notice.
The Congress approved the purchase of arms,
powder, and ammunition,
which were to be stored until needed.
In early April, 1775,
the militia received word
that the British knew of the stockpile
and were moving to seize it.
The militia were able to move
most of the supplies out,
distributing them among nearby towns.
At 2 a.m. on April 19th,
about 700 British regulars,
including light infantry and grenadiers,
marched out of Boston toward Concord.
As they marched through Lexington,
they had their first encounter
with the Massachusetts militia.
Captain John Parker
and 75 armed militiamen
stood at attention.
Greatly outnumbered,
Captain Parker had told his men
not to start a fight.
As the British advance party
eyed the militiamen,
someone's trigger finger itched.
No one knows who fired
that shot heard round the world,
but Captain Parker testified
that it wasn't any of his men.
In response to that first shot,
the British fired a volley
into the militia
and then charged forward
with their bayonets.
Bayonets turned the long muskets
into spears and pikes
to be used in deadly hand-to-hand combat.
Bayonets were a military addition
to the gun.
Expert riflemen in the colonies
might have far more skill
than British troops as marksmen,
but they had no experience
with the bayonet.
A British bayonet charge
could be terrifying to the Americans
and for good reason.
The accuracy of the smoothbore muskets
was so poor
that most shots never struck flesh,
but the bayonet could stab
and cut through that flesh
to deadly effect.
That day in Lexington, Massachusetts,
the British bayonet charge
accounted for most
of the eight militia men killed
and ten wounded.
Only a single British soldier was wounded.
The British troops moved on to Concord
where they found the small amount
of supplies that had not been moved
and burned them.
As they marched back to Boston, however,
the British were attacked
by minutemen who had gathered
after hearing the shots fired
and seeing the smoke in Concord.
Shooting from behind fences and trees,
the militia harassed the British regulars
all the way back to Boston.
The colonists were demonstrating
those military tactics
that they had learned from the natives,
a guerrilla style of hit and run,
shooting from concealment
at a larger but less mobile force.
The militia killed 73 British soldiers
and wounded 174.
The war had begun.
The militia encamped around Boston
beginning an 11-month siege.
In June, the Continental Congress
formed the First Continental Army
with George Washington
as commander-in-chief.
This included the formation
of 10 companies of expert riflemen
to serve as light infantry.
Six companies were drawn from Pennsylvania,
two from Maryland,
and two from Virginia,
states where the rifle was most widely used.
These riflemen were expected
to provide their own arms,
powder horn, shot pouch,
and other equipment.
These were men such as Timothy Murphy
of the Pennsylvania frontier,
the son of Irish immigrants.
Timothy and his brother John
enlisted in Captain John Loudon's company
of Northumberland riflemen
where he demonstrated himself
an expert marksman
able to hit a seven-inch target
at 250 yards.
Murphy's skills qualified him
to be placed into Daniel Morgan's
elite rifle corps.
When it comes to the ability
to use firearms in battle,
when you're looking at the Continental Army
versus the British Army,
one of the popular myths
is that we were armed with rifles
that were capable of inflicting
fatal casualties out to 300 yards or better
while the British were armed
with smoothbore muskets of 75 caliber.
That's three quarters of an inch
in diameter of lead flying through the air.
British Major once wrote in his diary,
woe be it to the unlucky,
unfortunate fellow
struck and done harm
by a ball fired at a distance
of greater than 75 yards.
That was true for the smoothbores.
The rifles could reach
three times that distance.
The problem was that not everybody
was armed with rifles
as the popular myth is so prevalent.
Certainly the Minutemen at Concord
and Lexington did fire at the British.
They harassed that column
from dawn until dusk
by firing at them from behind trees
and rocks and bridges
and they were very excellent marksmen.
They had used their guns.
They were economical in shooting
because these were the tools
that fed their family.
These weren't rich individuals.
These were individuals
that were eking out a living
on the frontier out in the country.
Every shot counted back then.
A wounded deer from a misplaced shot
would result in hours of tracking
and the expenditure of more powder and lead
of which was in short supply.
Daniel Morgan was a veteran
of the French and Indian War.
During the Revolutionary War,
he commanded a crack troop of marksmen,
backwoods men who had grown up
hunting, tracking, and scouting.
Officially named the Rangers,
they were better known
as Morgan's Riflemen.
At the Second Battle of Saratoga,
October 7th, 1777,
Morgan's Riflemen were there.
Morgan commanded the left flank
of the American forces.
During the battle,
the British line fell into disarray
but British General Simon Fraser
was rallying them to reform.
American General Benedict Arnold,
who had not yet turned traitor,
saw General Fraser and shouted to Morgan,
That man on the gray horse
is a host unto himself
and must be disposed of.
Direct the attention of some
of the sharpshooters
amongst your riflemen to him.
Morgan did as he was commanded
and soon Tim Murphy
was climbing a tree
that would give him a clear line of sight
to the target 300 yards away.
He fired a single shot
and General Fraser fell.
Without Fraser to rally them,
the British line fell apart.
The Americans won at Saratoga
and in the process secured France
as a formal ally in the war.
But though the rifle had proven itself
a formidable weapon,
it had serious drawbacks in combat.
So the idea that we all had rifles
is somewhat of a myth.
The Continental Army was equipped
with muskets that were very similar
to the British muskets
and when the two armies met,
they generally met closing at distances
of less than 100 yards,
firing smoothbore muskets at each other.
But the riflemen,
the American side,
did have a greater number
of individual riflemen.
The problem was is that
they were going up against
the best trained army in the world
at that time.
These British redcoats
had tremendous military discipline.
They had been professional soldiers.
They weren't volunteers.
They weren't new recruits.
The American army
was basically inexperienced.
There were a few that had experienced
the French and Indian wars
and some of the colonial wars
with the Native Americans in the area,
but very few of them
had the type of training,
the type of discipline
that the British soldier had.
When it came to actually fighting
on the field,
we were at a distinct disadvantage.
When the British, however,
actually saw the effectiveness
of rifled musketry on their ranks
from the Continental Army
and the units that were using rifles,
they adopted a regiment
of riflemen themselves,
but they never put them
to their tactical advantage.
The smoothbore muskets
like the Brown Bess
were the standard infantry weapons
for a good reason.
They could be loaded and fired
much more rapidly than a rifle.
For a bullet to benefit
from the gun barrel's rifling,
it must fit snugly into the barrel.
It could take a full minute
to load a rifle.
First, the powder is poured
from the powder horn
into the powder measure
to ensure the proper amount of powder,
or riflemen might choose
just to eyeball it.
The powder is then poured
down the barrel of the rifle.
Then the rifleman prepares the patch,
a moistened or greased bit of material.
The lead ball is rammed down the barrel
carefully on top of the patch
using a ramrod.
Finally, he cocks the hammer
and adds powder to the priming pan.
Now he's ready to shoot,
the whole process
having taken about a minute.
In contrast,
a smoothbore musket
could use a prepared paper cartridge
containing the powder and the ball.
The soldier would bite open a cartridge,
pour a little powder into the priming pan,
close the pan,
and pour the rest of the powder
down the muscle.
The powder was followed
by the rest of the cartridge,
paper and lead ball,
the paper serving as the wadding.
Then he would ram the ball in
and was ready to fire.
Trained soldiers could load and fire
a smoothbore musket
four times per minute.
Also, the rifle,
like all civilian long guns,
was not designed to accommodate a bayonet.
Not long after their success at Saratoga,
Morgan's riflemen encountered
some British light infantry
under Colonel Robert Abercrombie.
The riflemen moved to attack
and Abercrombie ordered a bayonet charge.
Only a quarter of the riflemen
had time to fire a single shot
before being scattered and driven back.
But the British feared the riflemen nonetheless,
specifically the British officers
who were being killed.
The European style of fighting,
with massed soldiers firing volleys
while standing in the open,
was completely at odds
with the small bands of hunters
who picked off British officers
without warning.
Many among the British army
considered this cowardly
or even a war crime.
Nonetheless, they recognized
the value of riflemen as skirmishers,
though they did not have as many in the field.
A thousand British rifles,
the pattern 1776 infantry rifles,
were distributed to the light companies
of each regiment.
British Major Patrick Ferguson
also developed a breech-loading rifle.
About a hundred of these
were issued to Rifle Corps in 1777.
Of course, most American soldiers
were also using smoothbore muskets.
During the American Revolution,
most American soldiers carried
a Brown Bess, Charleville,
or a Committee of Safety musket,
which were patterned on the Brown Bess.
After the war,
the American army needed
its own standard issue musket.
In 1776, an arsenal was established
in Springfield, Massachusetts.
In 1794, it became
the first national armory,
and in 1795, it produced
the first truly American musket.
During the war,
thousands of 1766 Charlevilles
had been delivered to the colonies
by their French allies,
and the gun was well-regarded
by American soldiers.
It served as the inspiration
for the 1795 U.S. Army musket.
which would be used
during the War of 1812.
Thanks for watching.
If you'd like to help us produce
more compelling historical content
like this,
please like, comment below,
and share this video
with fellow history buffs.
And of course, be sure to subscribe
to help keep history happening.
