袁弓夷吳文昕直播:美最高法院判特朗普有豁免權;封口費案延期;中共豬隊友哈馬斯曝光大量中國產炮彈;點解全世界遊客都愛去日本 #信燕訪談 #袁弓夷 #吳文昕 #特朗普 #拜登 香港議會選舉之去共保港第13集

《看中國》香港頻道
2696粉絲
28 次觀看·2024年7月3日
🔥請加入乾净世界 https://www.ganjing.com/zh-CN/channel/1f6j576aqao3taCY3b7gv3NXG1540c<br>🔥請加入我們的Patreon,http://www.patreon.com/visiontimesHK<br>🔥請首選Stripe捐款:https://www.secretchina.com/kzgd/donate.html<br>🔥請加入榮譽會員: https://www.secretchina.com/kzgd/subscribe.html<br><br>香港巨變、新聞自由日益收窄,同香港人一齊經歷過槍林彈戰嘅我哋,國安法後要面對更多嘅挑戰同打壓,加上FaceBook Youtube等嘅種種限制、黃標甚至關閉,「報導真相,揭露邪惡」變得越嚟越艱難。<br><br>不過,無論前路有幾咁艱難險阻,我哋永不忘初衷,荊棘路上繼續為大家深挖真相,還公民知情權!<br><br>感謝你哋一路以來嘅不離不棄,請繼續支持我哋,加入我哋嘅Patreon,成爲我哋嘅榮譽會員,願榮光早日歸於香港!<br><br>本視頻僅代表嘉賓或受訪者本人觀點。<br><br>聯絡我們 [email protected]
Hello everyone, welcome to the Live Broadcast of Believer. I am Lily Cheung.
Today's guest is Mr. Yan Gong-Yan, the founder of the Hong Kong Parliamentary Elections.
Hello, Mr. Yan.
Your voice is a bit off, Lily.
Mr. Yan, can you hear me?
I can hear you now.
I heard you just now.
Oh, you can hear me now?
Yes, I can hear you clearly.
Okay, hello, Mr. Yan.
Hello everyone, good morning.
I'm sorry, I just got off the plane.
I flew from Japan to the West Coast of the United States.
Today is the National Day of the United States.
They invited me.
There are a few programs on the National Day,
and I have to say a few words.
Of course, I have to say a few words.
Yes, it's a great honor.
International human rights lawyer, Chinese expert, Mr. Wu Man-Yin.
Hello, Mr. Wu.
Hello, everyone.
On the contrary, I just got home from Sweden.
Oh.
I have to speak in English in Sweden.
Yes, it's a great honor.
You talk about human rights,
and I talk about the Communist Party.
Yes, both of you are anti-communist pioneers.
You have to learn from each other.
That's right.
Today, I will talk about four news items.
The U.S. Supreme Court has sentenced Trump to life imprisonment.
Biden is in a hurry.
Trump's case was sentenced to nine months in prison.
The Chinese Communist Party has a lot of Chinese bombs.
Why do tourists all over the world like to travel to Japan?
First of all, the first news.
The U.S. Supreme Court found that on July 1,
the 6-to-3 vote result determined
that the president has absolute constitutional immunity.
The president's other official actions also have confidential immunity.
The president's private actions do not have this immunity.
But Biden opposes the court's ruling.
What do you think, Mr. Yan?
I'm not praising myself.
I spent most of my time in Washington.
I studied in the U.S.
I lived in the U.S. for 20 years.
It may not be the same now.
It may not be the same in the next five years.
So, I don't know much about the U.S. situation.
I am forced to work for Hong Kong.
I have to rely on the U.S. to help.
I know the U.S. very well.
This sentence is very important.
But I can't even pronounce the words correctly.
I will use the words of Hong Kong people.
After hearing it, they will understand.
This is not a judgment.
This is a law of law.
Explaining the law.
A law of law is not a judgment.
A judgment is when a person is guilty or not.
How long do you have to be punished?
Is the person right or not? There is no judgment.
There is no targeting of any person.
There is no targeting of any case.
In short, you have to follow this spirit
to do these cases.
The word of law of law
is the most well-known word in Hong Kong.
It has been known by the Communist Party several times.
Everyone knows it.
No one doesn't understand it.
If you don't understand it,
you have to explain it to the Hong Kong people.
This is the law of law.
Secondly, what exactly is the law of law?
It's actually very simple.
One is called public order.
The other is called private order.
We Chinese people understand this.
What is public order?
At that time, no matter what he did,
he could not be sued.
This word is too advanced.
He could not be sued.
We Hong Kong people understand it.
You can't sue him. Do you understand?
But if he did something wrong privately,
First, you have to prove that he did it privately.
Sometimes, the company
You know, the CEO
365 days, 24 hours
He does it like this.
Sometimes, what he did
Is it public or private?
If it's not public, you have the right to sue.
It's private, you have the right to sue.
In this case,
The court has to be on the basis of this
受理
受理, these two words
We Hong Kong people understand.
The court can not be sued.
You can't sue him.
If you want to be sued,
On the contrary, the prosecution has to prove that it is private.
If he did something wrong in private,
Then you can sue him.
So, look at the cases of Trump before.
Basically, he is the president.
Including his cover fee
$150,000 cover fee
He entered the account
Enter the election fund
At that time, he was already the president.
He entered the account.
Now, if you sue him,
He took private money
Give people a cover fee
Take it as an election fee
Now sue him for this
At that time, he was the president.
First, you have to prove that this is private or public.
It's hard to say.
This is a gray area.
Then, his documents
The so-called confidential documents of the Sea Lake Mansion
Before he retired
Every president is the same
Take some documents, divide them into two parts
Some are sent back to the national archive
The other part, he took it home
In the future, he will be the owner
Or put it in his library
A lot of presidents
Someone will help him build a library
He took all his confidential documents
It's very important
A lot of foreign officials wrote to him
He took this part and put it in the library
So it's not very private
It can't be bought
Purely for historical value
He has complete power to do this
And the judgment
What is confidential, what is not confidential
It's up to him to judge
No one can say he is wrong
This is confidential
When he was president
He said these documents are confidential
These are not confidential
It's up to him to judge
All presidents are like this
This is the rule
So you can't say he took some confidential documents
Take it home and put it in the Sea Lake Mansion
In the Sea Lake Mansion
You can't say that
You have to prove
Is there anything inside
This is not a private matter
It can be said to be the president's business
Everyone's business
Whether it's President Reagan
Whether it's Clinton
Whether it's Bush
Whether it's Obama
Everyone took all the documents back
This is their future history
This case can't be judged
January 6th
He said he incited the people to go to the Sea Lake Mansion
He is still the president on January 6th
This can be said to be public
It can also be said to be private
But he was standing in the White House that day
He said something
Of course, people were very excited
In words, he didn't directly incite
There was indirect incitement
In fact, he called him to demonstrate
Who knew a few people rushed in
Caused a lot of problems
No matter what the consequences are
He has the right to do so
He has the right to do so in public
You can't sue him
Can you take a few cases down?
Can you sue him for nothing?
He also said he did not accept the election results in 2020
Want to push back
He was still the president at that time
Is this public or private?
The impression is that it can be said to be private
He said he thought he was a contestant
Is it for himself?
But it's very difficult
You said he was, you prove it
On the contrary, the public has the responsibility to prove
It's not that Trump has the responsibility to prove this
This is the law of foreign countries
It's called common law
The good thing about common law
What is the definition of innocence?
Innocence
In the beginning, you can't treat him as innocent
Treat him as innocent
You have to find evidence to prove that he is guilty
This is a good question from the United States
There is a very important question in the United States
It is divided into three sections
Administrative, legislative and judicial
Judicial cannot interfere with administrative
The president is the administrative
The court is the judicial
Judicial has no right to interfere with administrative
Administrative has no right to interfere with judicial
So you can see
This is the spirit of the three-power separation in the United States
This spirit is that the president is quite powerful
In fact, they just asked Trump to deal with it
In fact, many people in the United States have great power
You just talk about the judge
Have you ever heard of the judge?
Sometimes the judge is really guilty
He has the right to intervene
Do you understand?
No matter what the judge judges
You can't sue him
You can only appeal
But you can't sue him for compensation
The judge's case is a matter of personality
It can't be said
So this case is very important
Basically, Trump is gone
Even if they want to sue him again
There is not enough time
It's a matter of November
It needs to be tried
If he becomes president
He said he has the right to shoot
The federal case
He has the right to shoot for the federal case
He may not have the right to sue
But based on this
Those people will take a long time to deal with
Just to prove that he is private
It will take a long time to deal with
He has to sue
Re-establish the case
Re-sue
Re-vote
Everyone is arguing
You issue documents
I issue documents
Everyone issues documents
It will take a long time
Issue evidence
It will take a long time
Basically, this money can be said to be
Trump's great victory
Several cases
Almost all were dismissed
This is a very good thing
In fact, those people
We Hongkongers think they are making a living
Basically, we don't want him to participate
We know he has too many votes
Because of the support of the people
We don't talk about other people
We talk about the support of the people
It's very intense
Wherever he goes
People line up
Sometimes they line up at night
Watch him on the day
Watch his speech
He doesn't even have a speech
He has to pay for it
The extent of his support is incredible
So this time
It is very beneficial for him
Especially after the debate
The debate is also
The debate is not his great victory
It's his small victory
But Biden lost
He lost completely
Everyone saw it
I don't need to say anything
Trump doesn't need to say much
Just watch
Watch Biden embarrass himself
So in the past two weeks
The actual situation
It can be said
It's almost settled
Emma
I agree with you
I personally think
These Supreme Court
The Supreme Court's decision
It should be very beneficial to Trump
But why did Trump say
He was dissatisfied with the law
I don't understand
The six of them
Agree with what I said just now
Three of them are against it
I am a woman
One of the black women
I am a woman
She said
Aren't you the emperor now?
Aren't you above the law?
This word is also very heavy
That is to say
The U.S. is now a democratic republic
A helping democratic republic
Why would the emperor be above the law?
This woman is actually wrong
Trump has power
His power is so great
More than the emperor
You know that the power of the U.S. President is very great
But it is balanced and controlled by many places
Three powers are divided
First, there is legislation
Second, there is judicial
This is the main thing
The most important thing is the constitution
In the constitution
It is clearly stated
If you do something wrong
You can be impeached
That is to say, your domestic affairs
Your suggestions
In addition
You can be impeached by the House of Representatives
That is to say, you can be expelled
In the end
What is the most important thing?
The people can not elect you after four years
They can send you home
The emperor has no such problem
So you say
Trump
I think Trump
All the Republican Party
In the past
After the debate
And after the judgment
Basically
Trump's core people
Didn't say a word
Not a word
This is great
Let your own Democratic Party
In the end
It's so chaotic
It's so noisy
Now some people say
To find someone to replace Biden
Some people say
Biden should continue
But the two parties are so different
This is very normal
This kind of fight is very normal
But Trump
In fact, he didn't say a word
Instead, he took the lead
Then people became
Focused on the issues of the Democratic Party
There are a lot of problems in the Democratic Party
Everyone is looking at his problems
No one talks about the Republican Party
The Republican Party is really stuck
So I
Sorry
I don't remember which sentence he said
I am not satisfied with this
Of course, I also said something in those three
These three people are very left-wing
They are very left-wing
The judges are also
Left-wing presidential candidates
Or right-wing presidential candidates
This is the basic position of these people
The basic position of these people
So I can't see how Trump will not be satisfied
Trump just wants these three
People of different opinions to be dissatisfied
I think
There is a good thing in the US
That makes sense
There is a good thing in the US
The Supreme Court has nine Supreme Judges
Each person's opinion
Must be made public
It's not that everyone has the same opinion in the end
Then the same opinion will be made public
No
What each person says
What they are dissatisfied with
All will be made public
Voting
Six to three
Nine people's opinions
Must be made public
So this is the spirit of law in the US
We used to be very familiar with Hong Kong law
We Hong Kong people
But compared to the US
The US has already developed
The law is not dead
It's alive
It keeps improving
It adapts to the needs of our society
It adapts to the needs of the constitution
It keeps improving
So the US system is alive
You don't see much in the UK
You don't see any improvement in the UK system
Or the political system is not improving
The law is basically the same
Of course it has its advantages
Very stable
But the US economy
And the society has changed too much
It has this need
The law has to adapt to the needs of the society
Yes
Sorry
I was struggling
No problem
The audience likes to listen to Yuen Papa
Let's look at the next question
The second news is
On 2nd July, the former US President Donald Trump
was first sentenced to death
This is an assessment of the highest court
on the impact of the president's
exemption from power
The judge agreed to
postpone Trump's
death sentence to
9th September
This is the second time
after the president's speech
The judge is Yuen Papa
Thank you
This case
In fact, New York
New Yorkers are extremely left-wing
New York state, New York City
Especially New York City
This case was tried in the south of New York City
The judge is also extremely left-wing
He is from South America
He is from Chile
There are a lot of left-wing people in South America
The prosecutor
The District Attorney
She is also very left-wing
I am not against her
I am not a racist
But a lot of black people
Because the US has to
treat black people
When they are not qualified
They can still do that
Do you understand?
It's very dangerous
This is the problem
I don't want to be a black person at all
But the way she did it
Made the whole world
Doubt whether black people are qualified
Whether black people are judges
Lawyers
Prosecutors
Always
Now the power is so great
People doubt whether you are qualified
Whether you are a teacher
Whether you are a scholar
Are you qualified?
This is a big problem
I am not criticizing
Everyone has this feeling
So this case
Actually
Her lawyer
Her lawyer gave her $150,000
The so-called
She is also a prostitute
Gave her money
Trump said
I have nothing to do with her
Especially in the debate
I made it clear
I am still there
But she is not suing him
What did she sue him for?
That $150,000
In the end, Trump
When he entered the account
His people
Of course not
He has a account
When he entered the account
It was a campaign fund
A cover-up fund
Turned into a campaign fund
Now she sued him for this
Said he cheated
Now New York is suing him for this
And this is state law
Not federal law
And it was judged
All 34 crimes
Said he was guilty
And waiting
Originally waiting for July 11
To be sentenced
Still holding him
First told him to pay
More than $300,000
So-called compensation
Right?
In the end
The appeal
Went to about $150,000
$150,000
Immediately to get cash
Cash
Or find someone to guarantee
But others guarantee
Others are watching you
Please put down
Put down the compensation
Right?
If you really go to jail
I'll pay you back
So it became
This thing
To Trump
Actually
It's all over
Then the crime
I can't explain
Because
General election fees
It's not right
After 7 years
It can't be said
After that
We have some laws in Hong Kong
After how many years
It can't be said
To be honest
It was all forced
So now
The Supreme Court
Judged him like this
You have to start from the beginning
Trump was the president at that time
You said it was a public matter
Or a private matter
He said it was a public matter
You said it was a private matter
No problem
Then I opened a case
To prove that it was a private matter
Then I opened a case
Then you can sue
If not
You have violated this spirit
So this law
The spirit of judgment in the future
Is very important
This time
It stopped
The judge stopped
He knew
He knew there was no way
You can't violate
The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court can fire you
If you have the right
You can do anything
Then he can
He allowed to postpone
Allowed to postpone
It means he knew there was a problem
If not
No need to
On July 11th
No need to
There was a case
He was not allowed to run for election
The old man was fine
There was a state
He was not allowed to run for election
No name
That was the old man
The Supreme Court
Has judged
There is no one
Has the right
To take his name
To be on the list
Of the state elections
To be on the list
Yes
Mr. Ng
If it continues
It depends on the look
It depends on the trend
In the future
President Trump's great victory is very possible
Even if the Democratic Party does something
like cheating
I think it will be very difficult
Because cheating can only affect a few percent
But if Trump wins 10%
It is very difficult to change in a fraudulent way
I can say that
Under normal circumstances
It should be Trump who wins
He has won a lot
Our Hong Kong people call it
Win a whole straight road
But
But the question is
You can't say it's an accident
Last time, in 2020, there must have been a problem
The vote will stop halfway
Then Hunter Biden
and Biden's son, the tough guy,
and there will be five or ten people coming out to testify
saying that this is fake news from Russia.
But later it turns out that it's not.
This is actually a trick.
These tricks are very important to the Democratic Party now.
Because they have to win.
They've done a lot of wrong things.
They can cover it up by re-election.
If Trump gets elected,
everything will be cleared up.
They've done a lot of bad things.
And this time, if Trump gets elected,
he will change everything.
In the U.S.,
if you look at how much money he spends,
how much money he borrows,
you can see how brave he is.
You can see how brave the government is.
So if Trump gets elected,
the Democratic Party will be in a big trouble.
So they won't let him get on the stage.
This is what's happening now.
In terms of the extent of the accident,
you can say that it was an accident.
In terms of politics,
accidents can happen anytime.
We shouldn't think that the U.S. is something else.
The U.S. is like a gun.
There are a lot of guns.
And it's like Kennedy was shot.
Kennedy was shot.
Reagan was shot too.
Luckily he didn't die.
Luckily he was shot in the lung.
But the problem is
that the U.S. is a very violent society.
Don't think that the U.S. is very civilized.
The U.S. is very civilized.
The U.S. uses the law to contain its violence.
Remember, the U.S. is very violent.
Anyone can buy a gun.
Why do people want guns?
They say, if you are a soldier or a police officer,
and you take away my power,
I will use a gun to protect my power or freedom.
You can't say that this statement is wrong.
But what does it prove?
It proves that the violence on both sides is very violent.
So it's not surprising at all.
If someone uses a gun,
and aims at him,
and shoots him with a gun,
then it's over.
This is what we call
a dead end.
There's nothing to see.
So now the U.S. is in great danger.
If Yan Baobao doesn't say anything,
a lot of people don't know,
including Hong Kong people.
We Hong Kong people don't have guns now.
We can only watch,
we can only shout.
I'm walking up to your radio station now to shout.
So you can't say he's wrong.
You can't say he's right.
Each has his own way of doing things.
He uses a gun to protect his freedom.
Why?
Those who have power can also use violence
to take away your freedom.
So you can't say he's wrong.
Because it's very rare for him.
He got that independence from the British government.
He can have his own freedom,
the kind of freedom in the U.S.
It's not easy.
So those people say I have to protect.
I don't know how to use violence to bleed.
I have to protect.
This is his spirit.
So this spirit is the same as us.
For example, Meng Yan lives in Europe.
There is no such spirit in Europe.
We Asians are not used to this kind of thing.
Do you understand?
But you can see our problem.
Now that the Communist Party is doing this,
the Chinese people can't say a word.
There's no sound at all.
More than 100 million people.
The CCP and the U.S. are just 180 degrees opposite.
The Communist Party in China,
not to mention guns,
they don't even allow you to have a knife.
You have to register.
You have to register to fight.
You buy a very long knife,
a knife that can kill people.
They want you to tie a long knife to a chain.
You have to register.
I think the U.S. has a very simple idea.
They say a government should be for the people.
So you don't have to be afraid of those people.
You treat the people well.
Although they have guns,
they won't kill you.
But we allow them to have guns
because we want you to be a government official.
You have to treat your people well.
This is the starting point.
It's the exact opposite of the Communist Party.
So it's hard to say.
When I was young,
I thought the European system was more civilized,
and people wouldn't be allowed to have guns.
But now I don't think that way.
Because the European system is not like the CCP.
But there's still a problem.
If you do this,
the officials will feel that they are superior.
Everyone knows that government officials are public servants.
They are people who have been paid to feed the people.
I remember once in Germany,
there was an official who was not very good.
He didn't treat me well.
He treated me like a friend from mainland China.
He was a refugee.
When he was speaking, he was so high and mighty.
I couldn't help it.
But I wasn't angry with him.
I was very friendly to him.
I said,
Mr. Government Official,
you should think about it.
We are the people who feed you.
If we don't pay you,
you won't even get your salary.
He was very scared.
He didn't dare to change his attitude.
But I was very friendly to him.
The problem in Germany is even bigger.
Because in Germany,
during the Hitler era and the Bismarck era,
people were treated like government officials.
There was no such thing in Sweden.
It wasn't like that in Sweden.
My wife had never been an official in Sweden before.
But she had been a civil servant.
It was very interesting for them to accept the salary.
The government officials were also given a salary.
The teacher of the salary said,
remember, the people are our customers.
They are our customers.
If they don't pay us, we won't even get our salary.
So when you treat the people,
you have to think that you are a salesperson.
The people are your customers.
You have to treat them like that.
I was very happy when I heard that.
So Sweden has done a very good job in this regard.
What your wife said is very true.
This is the extent of Europe's democracy.
Basically, the people are your customers.
Let me give you an example.
Who is in charge in the mainland?
The CCP is in charge.
That's the fact.
The party is in charge of the people's homes.
But in the US,
I always tell them that
the difference between the US and China is
that the people of the US are the masters.
This doesn't sound very reasonable.
But we use a better term.
The sovereignty is in the hands of the people.
You are the master.
I command you to do what you want.
You can really do what you want.
The people are the masters.
Although I can only have one ticket,
but that ticket can drive you away.
It can drive you away.
So this master,
remember, especially us Easterners,
I often go to Japan.
Taiwan is better.
Taiwan has had several elections.
Who knows who is the master?
It's not your political party.
It was elected by the people's vote.
But the US and Taiwan
have basically begun to understand their spirit.
But the Taiwan issue,
half of the people are pro-communist.
That's another matter.
So you have to learn to be the master.
A few weeks ago,
I was in England and France
and talked to a lot of people.
A lot of Hong Kong people
didn't understand.
I can tell you now,
whether it's Situ Wah
or Li Chu-ming,
these are very famous people.
They don't understand.
The people are the masters.
They think they can talk to the Communist Party
about how to share power.
You don't need to share with them.
The power is yours.
You can't share with them.
If you share with them,
they will destroy you.
They will deceive you.
So the question of sovereignty
is something
that the Hong Kong Parliament
is preparing.
Before the election,
we will hold a public hearing.
I don't know how to wrap it up.
But the question is
who is Hong Kong?
Who is Hong Kong?
Is Hong Kong's sovereignty
the UK, the CCP
or the people of Hong Kong?
It's that simple.
If the people of Hong Kong have sovereignty,
they have the right to set up a parliament,
set up a government,
set up anything,
but they are elected by the people.
They have a set of procedures
to use your sovereignty.
You can't use your sovereignty
to do whatever you want.
You need a set of procedures
and legal procedures.
This is very important.
The reason why we are holding the Hong Kong Parliament
is to get the sovereignty
back to the people.
You can't let the CCP do whatever they want.
They should do it for themselves.
They have to protect the integrity of Hong Kong.
So the starting point
is not for the people of Hong Kong.
It's for the people of Hong Kong
to organize themselves.
Yes, that's right.
Let's talk about
the third news.
The Chinese Communist Party
has exposed a large number
of Chinese-made bombs.
A video shown by
the Palestinian armed group
Hamas
shows
Chinese-made bombs.
The video shows
about 100 bullets
placed near
Hamas' military base
on December 7, 2023
after attacking Israel.
The Israeli military
attacked Hamas'
Weijiazha warehouse
and found a large number
of Chinese-made weapons
and ammunition
and Chinese military-grade
communication equipment
and Chinese intelligence
collection equipment
are all from China.
The question is
whether the weapons
are directly provided by the Chinese Communist Party
to Hamas.
It's not directly
provided by Iran.
This method
has been around for a long time.
I always say
that the Chinese Communist Party
is very good at one thing.
In the beginning,
the Chinese Communist Party's view
was not isolated.
The Chinese Communist Party
is not isolated.
The Chinese Communist Party
is united.
I have told you many times
that the reason why the Chinese Communist Party
supports Russia
to continue to attack Ukraine
and Hamas to attack Israel
is because they want to set fire everywhere
and finally take advantage of the fire
to attack Taiwan.
This is their strategy.
They support Hamas
not because they believe in
Islam.
If they believe in Islam,
they won't be in Xinjiang
and suppress
the Uighurs.
Uighurs
are basically
Muslims.
So it's not
because of that.
It's because
Hamas to attack Israel
is in line with
the global strategy
of the CCP
to dominate the world.
This is the main reason.
I remember in the 1970s,
when I was on a business trip
and went to the Middle East
for other reasons,
I found that
I often saw people from the mainland.
Everyone remembers
in the 1970s,
when Taiwan was not yet reformed
and open,
but they were already there.
I saw some people
who were very secretive.
When I saw them,
I knew they were from the mainland
and were cooperating with the Arabs.
I suspect
they were already doing
arms business
and selling arms.
Because the terrorist organizations
such as Hamas,
Israel,
and many others
such as Bin Laden
all these
terrorist organizations
can't be bought
in Western countries.
It's very difficult
for Western security forces
to keep an eye on them.
So the only place
they can buy arms
is China.
Many of them
come from Hong Kong.
I even know
that I have relatives
and friends
who are big businessmen
and have made a lot of money
to help China
export arms to all parts of the world.
So,
this is a rare talent.
So, this time
Hamas exposed
its propaganda
and sold arms to China.
It's not surprising to me.
A lot of arms
are from China.
As Lily mentioned,
there are also communications facilities.
Last year,
on October 7,
when Hamas suddenly
launched an attack on Israel,
many people raised questions.
Israel's intelligence
is one of the best
No one dares
to compete with Israel.
Israel is more powerful than Germany.
Why did Israel
attack Germany this time?
Why didn't Israel know?
The reason is very simple.
As far as I know,
Hamas' communications
system was very backward.
So, Israel
could easily
eavesdrop on them.
So, Israel could easily
control Hamas'
various terrorist organizations
and their communications.
Israel could easily
eavesdrop on them.
But this time, it didn't work.
Why? Because of the CCP.
Because the CCP ordered Huawei
to modernize
all communications systems
for Hamas
and other terrorist organizations.
So, Israel
didn't have time
to break the code.
So, this time,
Israel didn't eavesdrop on them.
So, Israel suddenly launched
an attack
that made Israel panic.
So, this incident
is a good lesson
I have many Jewish friends.
Some of them
are my old friends.
Some of them
have been my subordinates
for decades.
Emma also knows
many Jewish friends.
I think
the good thing
is that Israel
and the Jews finally woke up.
They shouldn't sell
so many good things
to the CCP for money.
I know
one of my old subordinates
left my company
and went back to Israel.
He worked
in a military factory
in Israel.
He was a very good engineer
in the area of
nuclear weapons.
As far as I know,
Israel has made many mistakes
in terms of money.
Because the CCP
can't sell
good nuclear weapons
everywhere.
Russia's nuclear weapons
are useless.
The best nuclear weapons
are in Israel
and Germany.
It's hard to buy
nuclear weapons
The CCP
can't buy nuclear weapons
in Israel
because the US
can see that.
Of course,
it's not because Israel
wants to help the CCP.
It's all about money.
If the CCP
agrees to sell
the most confidential
information about nuclear weapons,
it's willing to give a lot of money.
The Jews have a weakness.
When they see money,
they will give up.
So this time,
he got a big lesson.
Including my Jewish friends,
they are very,
very angry with the CCP.
Because they once sold
something to you,
and also helped you.
When you want our nuclear technology,
you say how good you are to us,
how friendly you are,
how great the Jews are,
how great Israel is.
But now,
it turns out that it's you
who helped Hamas
and Hezbollah to kill us.
So my Jewish friends
told me that Israel
has made this decision.
It's an internal decision.
It will never do business with the CCP again.
They are very angry with the CCP.
So this is a good thing
This is what
I've been to Israel many times.
I've been to Tel Aviv many times.
To be honest, I won't go again.
Because I have nothing to do
China always needs technology.
Do you remember a few years ago,
Wang Qishan flew in.
He bought a lot of good technology.
Wang Qishan has nothing to do with it.
Why did you go to Israel?
But they have big technology.
A lot of good technology.
You just talked about the big guns
and the drones.
Why are Chinese drones suddenly so powerful?
It has a lot to do with Israel.
I'm telling you,
the Jews,
this time, I just want to say
it's worth it.
All the terrorists in the Middle East
rely on the CCP.
So you see,
whether it's the Taliban,
or the Alibaba,
they always go to Beijing.
They give money,
and weapons.
Now it's better to go through Iran.
It's one thing.
In fact, the CCP is behind it.
What is the CCP doing?
When I was in Beijing,
I heard them talk about
the United States of Arabia.
You've heard of the United States of America.
You've heard of it.
The CCP is behind it.
They are setting up
the United States of Arabia.
The United States of Arabia.
Why? Because they want to control the whole of the Middle East.
Remember, the dream of the Middle East
is to have two big platforms.
The European platform
and the Asian platform.
And then there's the African platform.
They want to control it all.
In the end, Europe will come across Western Europe.
But Western Europe,
I'm not insulting you.
A lot of people are still sleeping in Western Europe.
I remember five years ago,
William helped me arrange a phone call
with a lot of European politicians.
William arranged it.
A lot of people.
It's the same as now.
At that time,
no one dared to offend the CCP.
They thought what we said was outrageous.
They said we were too much.
Now it's the same as the Israelis.
Now everyone understands.
So I think William,
you are particularly popular in Europe now.
Let me tell you, Elmer.
You've talked to one of them.
I don't know if you still remember.
His name is Michael Gala.
He is now sanctioned by the CCP.
Last time.
It was a few years ago.
Do you remember the last time he sanctioned
Mike Pompeo?
In the same sanction,
he also sanctioned
a German European congressman.
His name is Michael Gala.
So he is now
very anti-national.
Five years ago,
I went to Washington five years ago.
The attitude of the American officials
was exactly the same.
And it was exactly the same.
Those people thought
they would retire in the future
and go to the mainland to be an advisor.
It's a big deal.
Everyone is like this.
The entire US Department of State,
that is, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
everyone thought they would retire
and go to the mainland to be an official.
Everyone in the mainland is really crazy.
Every year they give you one million.
It doesn't matter.
This is a very powerful trick of the CCP.
Not only in the political world,
but also in the commercial world.
I remember
many years ago,
it was almost 20 years ago,
he hired a large number of
newly retired
German steel companies' experts.
You know, the German steel companies
are very powerful.
They are the best in the world.
They retired.
You know, in a democratic country,
when you retire, you are nothing.
You used to be a general engineer.
Many people listen to your orders
and respect you.
If you retire tomorrow, no one will hire you.
Right?
The CCP is very powerful.
After retiring,
they hire these newly retired people.
You know, if you retire
after a year and a half,
you are still very powerful.
You still have a lot of new
and high-tech skills.
They hire these retired experts
to go to Wuhan.
They are very powerful.
When they were in China,
they were well-treated.
When they came back to Germany,
they were praised by MBS.
MBS didn't have to pay much money.
Because these experts
are not poor.
Money doesn't matter.
But they think MBS is a tool
for making money.
It's very clear.
I can't understand.
Please continue.
So,
the same is true in politics.
Many people
請大量嘅所謂
Advisor 顧問
科技上同埋
政治上嘅顧問
佢哋甚至叻到將一啲退休嘅軍人
西方嘅軍人都請佢做顧問
呢啲人仲係好叻 啱啱退休咋嘛
半年前先退休咋嘛
你話如果退到二十年咁就冇乜用啦
啱啱退休就搵呢啲人
又唔需好多錢
包食包住包乜嘢包女人包服務
係
你記唔記得香港喺倫敦
叫做經濟經濟乜乜
嗰個辦公處呀咁佢哋咪請咗個鬼仔囉
西人英國人啦個英國人嘅本來呢
就係叫做海軍陸戰隊嘅
拉咗三個人吖嘛英國
其中一個英國人就係畀佢哋嚟用
幾萬磅嘅啫
因為佢嗰個英國人呢以前海軍陸戰隊㗎嘛
佢好多地方都識得自己人嚟㗎嘛
機場機密嘅地方要攞咩料呢佢唔使自己攞
咪搵個鬼仔去攞
真係畀人暗殺可能
肯定呀肯定呀殺人滅口㗎啦
真係呢樣嘢好嘅我哋講
我哋講下一個新聞好嗎咁係第四個
新聞呢就係貴瓶博士嘅報道呢日本國家
嘅旅遊局嘅最新數據顯示呀今年
截至五月呢有超過一千四百五十萬
嘅人呢係旅客呀抵達呢個日本去旅遊嘅
咁畀佢年同期增長到百分之七十喎咁
係有望超過二零一九年創紀錄嘅三千
一百萬嘅遊客呀係會創造更新嘅
紀錄啦咁係感覺全世界嘅人呀
都係好鍾意去日本旅遊嘅係爸爸點睇
我係日本專家
我琴日就啱啱喺我琴日喺大阪飛去東京
東京飛到呢三藩市咁咪大阪機場我清清楚楚
我成日都一個月都用好多次大阪機場關西機場
咁呢東京呢我就有用嗰個叫做雨田有用成田
就用好多㗎喇上個禮拜呀如果
入關呀啲遊客多到嘅情況呢要清入嚟你
梗係要檢查passport啦又要海關
三個鐘頭排咗三個唔係我呀我講嗰啲遊客排咗三個鐘頭
咁頭先你個數字就正印證你頭先個數字
咁你話千七萬多唔多呢就好多
對日本咁細嘅國家嚟講就好犀利嘅日本實際呢佢嗰啲景點
又係細到不得了你話佢京都呀京都等於我哋
一個咩香港一個小區嘅等於一個旺角咁嘅區
你唔好以為京都係咩大城市咁咪人山人海
真係又要去睇呀嗰啲人你話係一個旺角
講緊成百萬人咁湧入去邊度頂得住呀
咁係即係有價值日本呢就實際就係我哋
宋朝嘅嗰陣時所有嘢呢跟足我哋
宋朝嘅日本人嗰啲禮貌呀做人嗰啲
所謂唐宋
唐宋差唔多都幾近所以佢喺佢派咗好多人去唐朝
係咪去做又取經啦又去學嘢啦
跟住呢佢最後呢我哋中朝之後呢我哋中國人中朝
之後呢就畀蒙古人又搞咗一輪啦跟住畀朱元璋
朱元璋係耕田㗎嘛咁又畀佢搞咗一輪跟住又畀清朝人
搞咗一輪搞完之後呢我哋啲文化呢就七七八八
但日本呢就保留喺唐宋嘅階段
所以你見到啲人嗰啲人嘅行為思維呀
都係嗰啲人嚟㗎佢好講信用㗎好講面子
我哋中國人都好講面子而家共產黨都唔講面子
咁所以呢日本人嗰種禮貌乜嘢做好周到
唔會偷雞嘅即係做嘢冇偷雞嘅
但係呢你而家共產黨又好我哋香港人有時都係
偷雞做好多偷雞嘅嘢咁變咗啲嘢出到嚟呢就走樣
日本嘢真係唔走樣而且而家呢日本嘅價錢呀
美國美國我同日本比較係美國嘅三分一
美國嗰個通貨膨脹非常之犀利而且個貨幣呢最緊要
而家個貨幣跌到一蚊美金都要160
以前我覺得兩年前呢就110到
跌咗50%喎即係日本真係平咗50%
所以啲美國人去到呢係咁嗱乜嘢都買乜嘢都食
最靚嗰啲日本嗰啲好精緻嘅嗰啲食嗰啲好精緻嘅都係平
平到唔得了咁我佢而且呢日本人嘅模仿
我喺日本昨日喺日本啦我女請我食飯
食啲意大利嘢仲好過即係做得仲精密
過意大利法國餐呀意大利餐佢乜嘢都
佢係做得好冇話講而且唔貴以前又好貴以前日本紙高
嗰陣時好貴而家日本紙低咗真係平到不得了同埋佢呢
日本呢就冇個通貨膨脹唔係咁犀利唔係話冇因為佢多數嘅
原材料都用返自己日本本地嘅原材料
好食好多海鮮呀牛呀自己養嘅乜嘢原材料但係嗰啲國家呢
歐洲而家好慘英國特別慘嘅成日要入口嗰啲嘢呢
就貴到卑鄙尤其係英國英國嗰啲通貨膨脹千祈唔好去
阿文
我想就先阿Emma提到呢個日本文化
同中國文化我想再補充一下啦
我都去過京都京都咁好多人
可能唔知道呢係乜嘢呢京都呀嗰個
而家嗰個模樣呀成個京都嘅古城呀
係以前唐朝長安
細安係長安嘅百分之一百嘅
Copy一個複製只係呢
所有嘅建築物都細啲
Miniature
好有意思好多人都唔知道當時呢日本嘅天皇
係係係係要求嗰啲建築師
因為當時日本係每年派
三千學者去唐中國嘅唐朝取經
所以乜嘢人都有廚師啦建築師啦
詩人啦文學呀乜嘢技術呀全部
全部要將中國嘅文化
系統咁搬返去日本嗰度所以好多人呢唔明白
仲講呢有啲香港人中國人話
人哋日本人真係好禮貌又乾淨又有紀律
點解我哋中國人係咁衰好多人唔知道中國歷史
中國嘅唐朝呀就係咁嘅日本人
比今日嘅日本人仲要有禮貌仲要呢個有紀律
仲要信得過可靠等等
非常非常斯文嘅人嚟嘅所以點解中國
啲歷史學家話唐朝嘅時候路不拾遺
夜不備戶呀咁我研究下原來呢唐朝
好多好長嘅時間呢唔單止係夜不備戶
而係嗰啲門呢根本就冇鎖嘅唔需要
鎖因為偷嘢呢個咁嘅
Idea根本就不存在
冇人諗到要半夜三更去人哋屋企偷嘢
所以根本就冇人唔需要鎖門嘅
所以中國嘅文化文化就係
道德嘅載體所以文化被破壞呢
道德就會好敗壞咁中國剛才Elmer都講過
經過歷代越嚟越差但係最慘就係
將中國人嘅真係人義禮秩序
全部掃清光所以
我哋香港人都要明白唔係我哋中國人唔識得
有啲人話你睇下人哋英國人管香港仲叻過
而家中國人唔係係共產黨管香港
所以咁衰我成日同人哋講你睇下台灣
台灣冇英國殖民地西方人同我講
香港比大陸好好多英國人管
我話唔一定有一部分嘅原因係英國人但唔係全部
我話你睇下台灣冇英國人管過
人哋好好台灣都好乾淨好有紀律
啲人都好有禮貌所以
佢哋係承傳咗更多嘅傳統嘅中國文化
亦都有少少日本文化因為日本統治台灣30年
基本上主要嘅原因
我話以前嘅香港即97之前嘅香港
同台灣之所以比大陸好多唔係因為英國人
亦都唔係因為日本人而係因為香港同台灣
冇比共產黨統治過呢個係最主要嘅原因
我一定要講呢句話等香港人要明白唔係我哋中國人
我今日時間都差唔多不過加一句大家有興趣
大家都話日本老婆服侍好
我解釋嗰個情況畀你聽
我諗起我祖母或者外婆或者祖母
嗰代人同日本女人係一樣嘅
佢哋覺得呢個叫做苦道係我哋中國人嘅禮節
做女人就要咁樣
佢唔係因為愛你而咁做
呢個係佢嘅責任嚟嘅
佢做得唔好呢佢嘅親戚睇唔起佢
佢嘅朋友同學睇唔起佢
佢為咗自己而做佢唔係為咗愛情為愛情
佢做嘅嘢佢為佢每日佢做嘅工作
係為咗佢自己而做嘅係為咗佢
佢要得到嘅水平人哋有標準嘅有文化標準嘅
所以呢樣嘢呢而家你睇睇
共產黨全部破壞咗我有一次去到共產黨嗰種
喺大陸喺上海有男方同女方喺度講
分價嗰啲問題全部係商業性嘅
百分之一千係商業性嘅咁離晒譜嘅
根本乜都唔講嘅咩咩要做咩女人
愛情嗰啲全部唔講嘅咁我話你話呢個國家
所以生出嚟嘅人真係好大問題中國古代
每一個女人都願意做賢妻良母
男人都係男人都要做個有責任嘅人
佢唔係為咗乜嘢對方又為咗自己
修身係呀好彩啦日本
保持咗香港即係我哋嘅以前嘅文化啦
係呀中國嘅美好嘅真係非常之優秀嘅文化
保存落嚟本身呢係全世界點解去
日本呢就係因為日本各方面都好㗎嘛咁樣就
本身係嚟到係嚟中國㗎喎但係呢就因為
呢個中共破壞咗呢啲文化呢中國就冇
就冇得嚟啦咁就只可以去日本啦
係呀係呀
咁啊而家大陸人係日本買好多樓嘅
東京最貴嘅樓全部畀大陸人買晒
佢哋諗住走佬好多
你知咗大陸好多人同咗錢走佬
走日本就大量
因為離開中國近呀嘛而且啲文化
似近嘛你睇得知基本上
你睇啲漢字就睇得到
如果你有事我都有事我也有事
唔好意思唔好意思
好嘅我哋下次再見
多謝多謝
Thank you.
Bye-bye.
Thank you.
Bye-bye.
