Suffragette Mary Richardson's account of force feeding | Votes for Women
Mar 2, 2024
Warning: this video contains descriptions of force feeding which some viewers may find upsetting.
On 6th February 1914 Mary Richardson gave this testimony as part of a statement against force feeding delivered to the government by the Bishop of London, Arthur Winnington-Ingram.
Mary’s closest imprisonment to this date was for damaging windows of the Colonial Office in Whitehall, for which she was sentenced to 4 months.
This testimony and the Bishop’s statement are held at The National Archives in Kew.
Suitable for GCSE and A Level History.
[Music]
forcible feeding is to my mind one of
the worst forms of torture imaginable
the attack is brutal the method
primitive when I was first forcibly fed
I offered only passive resistance but
after a few days the process became so
degrading so morally staining to me as
well as increasingly painful that I was
obliged to resist the struggle with ten
wardresses is severe and in it the arms
and legs are twisted and the hands badly
cut by the wardresses nails after these
ten wardresses had overcome me and
thrown me violently on the bed three of
them lay full weight across my legs my
knees are still painful
cannot go up or down stairs without
difficulty on several occasions
wardresses fell on top of me on the
floor once so severely injuring my ribs
that I could not lie in bed on my left
side for several days twice my head was
thrown against the wall of the cell
owing to my feet being taken from under
me violently my face was blackened and
swollen from this even after my release
from prison
[Music]
the process of driving the tube through
the nose is very terrible as the tube is
usually too large for the nasal cavity
and when there appears any obstruction
more and more violent pushing is
resorted to on one occasion
dr. Pearson almost tore my nose in his
repeated efforts to force the tube
through the opening after 30 times of
nasal feeding my face eyes and nose were
so swollen and bruised that dr. Pearson
brought in a home office specialist and
after consultation he announced that he
would feed me by the throat tube
thereafter I refused to be so fed and
set my teeth together whereupon he ran
his second finger through my lips
cutting them and then finding the
extremity of my jaw he deliberately cut
my cheek with his fingernail I cried out
at his cruelty but he continued until in
agony my teeth were parted and a metal
spring gag inserted followed by the
feeding tube by this time the blood from
my cut cheek and gums was running from
the corner of my mouth down the neck
into my clothing and I began to choke
violently the pain of this operation was
beyond my insurance
I was driven almost mad by it and
springing off the bed when they had left
off holding me I ran out of my cell dr.
Pearson said I was in a dangerous state
of mind and must be treated accordingly
with the result that they refused to
open my cell door when I needed anything
and contented themselves with shouting
at me as they went to a lunatic the
following day dr. Pearson told me he had
decided to return to nasal feeding and I
was fed accordingly until I was
discharged four days later owing to an
attack of appendicitis this was brought
on by the hospital treatment I had been
receiving
[Music]

