Impeachment inquiry heats up after bombshell testimony from ex-Biden associate

You're now with Reaction Fox News legal analyst Greg Garrett along with Harvard law professor I don't know if you want to even be called a Harvard law professor anymore Alan Dershowitz I might say Hannity just introduced me as Alan Dershowitz I don't want to be associated with that place anymore, but that's up to you. Let me know I'm a meritus which means I'm a meritus that means formerly of Harvard Law School now on my own You're on your own Let's look at the big picture of what Joe Biden is facing here legally and also Compare it contrast it to what the president is facing this this Immunity issue and whether it's going to be taken up by the Supreme Court is critical professor. We'll start with you Well, there's so much hypocrisy going around They're now trying to impeach Joe Biden based on what he did as vice president now Remember that in the past the shoe was on the other foot and that is it was the Democrats Who were saying no, you can't you can impeach you can impeach a president when he's no longer President the second the second Trump impeachment So the the big issue in that case is can a person be impeached For what he did when he was vice president now that he's president We don't know the answer to that but the sides have shifted on that now since the target is no longer Donald Trump and the target instead is Joe Biden, so we'll have to wait and see whether or not that works out The same thing is true. By the way with the Mayorkas impeachment the the same people who used to say Oh, you need high crimes and misdemeanors And and crimes like treason and bribery are now saying no. No, it's okay If it's an abuse of office, whereas the other side who was saying it used to say That you can have broad broad criteria like abuse of power and an obstruction of Congress and now saying no, no, no It has to be specific So there's so much hypocrisy and that always happens when either side Weaponizes the criminal justice system and the Constitution and the loser is the American public You know the interesting part Greg and the professor's right this Question now whether the Supreme Court will take up the immunity case. This could very well affect Joe Biden You can't indict a sitting president. Most people agree with that. That has been DOJ policy However, if in fact Joe Biden as vice president took official actions that benefited his family members You have said that fits within the bribery statute. That would be the crime of bribery That would mean when Joe leaves office He doesn't have Executive privilege and that immunity from when he was vice president, does he? Right that that is correct. And you know, look it is a crime Under the bribery statutes. It's an impeachable offense known as bribery in the Constitution I'm against the ideas, you know of Impeaching a President during an election year. That's election interference in my judgment trying to disenfranchise the voters They should have the say on this now having said all of that Conferring using your public office to confer a benefit in exchange for money to yourself or Your family the money doesn't have to go to you is a crime and it's an impeachable offense And so, you know, are there grounds for impeachment here? Absolutely. I think the impeachment inquiry Continues to develop really critical evidence of the influence peddling schemes That Hunter Biden was in charge of but Joe Biden was intimately involved as John Solomon Just explained they were selling the Biden brand the brand was access and promises of Influence from Joe Biden. All right, and the promise egg alone sustains a criminal charge Exit question. Yes or no answer. I don't have the time. Will the Supreme Court take up the immunity issue? I believe they should professor I Believe they should and I believe they won't until after there is if there is a conviction I think they'll punt on that one. I think they will take up some of these other issues, however Great yes or no They should now but they won't now but they will take it up later in the event of a conviction That's right. You are both correct. I agree with both of you. All right, you get an a-plus professor good for you Hey Sean Hannity here Hey Click here to subscribe to Fox News YouTube page and catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis You will not get it anywhere else