Committee on House Administration Chairman Bryan Steil (WI-01) questioned the use of private funding going to politically-biased election administration efforts with witnesses Wednesday at a committee hearing titled “American Confidence in Elections: Confronting Zuckerbucks, Private Funding of Election Administration.” Since 2020, 27 states have prohibited private funding of election administration
Miss Hemingway I want to start with you
in the fall of 2020 the center for Tech
and Civil Life gave $6.3 million
collectively to the Wisconsin cities of
rine Green Bay Madison Milwaukee and
Kenosha correct I actually have the
number slightly higher it was you know
10 point over 10 million I think to
Wisconsin proper and I think maybe it
was that amount in the fall of 2020 but
as much as 8 and a half million overall
so we we'll agree that it's a lot of
money now these cities are supposed to
spend the CT's Grant funds on things
like personal protective equipment and
pole workers is that what it was for and
that's particularly how it was sold to
the general public it was for worker
recruitment drive-through recruiting
nonpartisan voter education but that's
not where all the money went in ctcl it
was spent on other things instead so did
they give it to outside liberal groups
or Democratic get out the vote efforts
they actually did and for absentee
ballot curing initiatives yes and again
in a disproportionate fashion and and
did they did they hire ctcl recommended
staffers in into County offices yes and
so in cities like Green Bay Wisconsin
isn't it right that they Outsource the
election duties to outside private
liberal groups yes but Wisconsin law
says that elections are run by clerks
and other government officials right
very clear yeah and so under ctl's Grant
terms that Outsourcing wasn't allowed
right it should not have been and ctcl
needed to get written permission for a
city like Green Bay to do this is that
correct yes yes did ctcl get permission
to that you know in there or any other
jurisdiction I don't believe we have
evidence that they did I don't think
there's any evidence they did so ctcl
approves these plans in writing and we
have an email from the then chief of
stat of the Green Bay mayor telling ctcl
that she would do whatever ctcl
recommended is that accurate yes and
what did ctcl end up recommending
scaling up the voting process by mail
yes and even recommending election
staffers yep stay on the topic of ctl's
recommending experienced election
staffers in Green Bay in Green Bay ctcl
recommended an election staffer from New
York is that accurate he was yes but in
Northeast Wisconsin it's a pretty big
place uh why didn't ctcl have anyone in
mind with experience in the state of
Wisconsin why do you think they brought
someone in from the state of New York I
don't know but he had access to he he
asked for and received access to quite a
bit of privileged information so so ctcl
recommends a New York election staffer
to come to Wisconsin in Green Bay to
help run the election and what role did
other ctac staffers play did they manage
the vote by mail process with updates on
absentee ballots did they send out
return and collect absentee ballots yes
did they supervise the counting of
ballots Yes again in Democrat areas in
the in the city of Green Bay did they
help voters cure absentee ballots and at
least one staffer had access to the
voting machines before election day and
was running the voting Counting
operation on Election night correct yes
and ctcl recommended staffers in some
instances actually re
replaced nonpartisan election workers is
that accurate drove them out yes that's
absolutely insane and so when we're
talking about these private funds coming
in I think it's incredibly appropriate
for us to dig in and understand what
they did and it's the reason that I
think it's so essential we passed my
legislation that would actually ban
Zucker bucks it would ban these private
funds from coming in because when you
see what these funds were used for it
does not instill confidence in the
elections process and so let me let me
jump over to you Mr Flanders uh if I can
I want to go to the 2022 rine Wisconsin
use of their Zucker bucks funding for
the illegal voting van how did this work
in practice did it stop in front of
specific locations did it have a
partisan bias yeah that's right the uh
the city determined where the locations
of the vanwood park would be uh and
there were 22 locations that had
actually ultimately parked in throughout
the uh August primary and when we did an
analysis looking at where those were
located they were uh more likely to be
located in Democratic leaning areas than
a republican leaning area has ever seen
so they they took the voting van that
was labeled as a clerk's office that
looks like a food truck and specifically
drove it to democratic leaning areas of
the city is that accurate that is
accurate and did they did they match
that and equally go to Republican
leaning jurisdictions they not they were
more likely to go to democratic leaning
areas so they utilized the funds to
drive forward a partisan agenda and is
that illegal in the state of Wisconsin
that is illegal under state law yes sir
and the judge ruled that it was illegal
correct correct and now since 2020 I'm
let me step out a little bit bigger
picture in since 2020 27 states have
banned Zucker bcks is that correct yes
but in the state of Wisconsin governor
iers actually vetoed the ban of Zucker
bucks not once but twice is that correct
is correct and so this could all happen
again in the state of Wisconsin this
election cycle is that accurate that is
correct that's the
problem